{"id":{"repo_id":"colostate","oai_identifier":"oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/48105"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/colostate/oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/48105","repository":{"repo_id":"colostate","name":"Colorado State University","base_url":"https://api.mountainscholar.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Comparison of positive and negative cloud-to-ground lightning dominant storms in three regions of the United States","abstract":"A statistical framework for analyzing storm data, called CLEAR (Colorado State University Lightning, Environment, Aerosols, and Radar), was used to examine the characteristics of seven storms in three different regions of the contiguous United States. Regions included the High Plains (eastern Colorado/western Kansas), central Oklahoma, and northern Alabama. Dual-polarization radar, lightning mapping array observations, and environmental reanalysis data were ingested by CLEAR to objectively assign lightning and environmental information to tracked storms. Comparison of environmental characteristics of the positive cloud-to-ground lightning (+CG) and negative cloud-to-ground lightning (-CG) dominant storms in the three regions showed no clear environmental difference between storms of different CG polarity dominance or between the regions themselves. Analysis of the lightning data showed the layer of maximum Very High Frequency (VHF) source density, inferred to be the positive charge layer, of the +CG dominant storms was at a much lower height (warmer temperature) than that of the -CG dominant storms. This indicated the probable existence of an inverted charge structure in the +CG dominant storms and supports previous research that suggested inverted charge as a cause of +CG dominance. Additionally, dual-Doppler analysis of the storms found that the +CG dominant storms had a much larger volume of >10 m s-1 updraft than the -CG dominant storms, which may contribute to the production of the inverted charge structure. The +CG dominant storms also had larger graupel echo volumes, consistent with the larger updraft volumes.","abstract_html":"A statistical framework for analyzing storm data, called CLEAR (Colorado State University Lightning, Environment, Aerosols, and Radar), was used to examine the characteristics of seven storms in three different regions of the contiguous United States. Regions included the High Plains (eastern Colorado/western Kansas), central Oklahoma, and northern Alabama. Dual-polarization radar, lightning mapping array observations, and environmental reanalysis data were ingested by CLEAR to objectively assign lightning and environmental information to tracked storms. Comparison of environmental characteristics of the positive cloud-to-ground lightning (+CG) and negative cloud-to-ground lightning (-CG) dominant storms in the three regions showed no clear environmental difference between storms of different CG polarity dominance or between the regions themselves. Analysis of the lightning data showed the layer of maximum Very High Frequency (VHF) source density, inferred to be the positive charge layer, of the +CG dominant storms was at a much lower height (warmer temperature) than that of the -CG dominant storms. This indicated the probable existence of an inverted charge structure in the +CG dominant storms and supports previous research that suggested inverted charge as a cause of +CG dominance. Additionally, dual-Doppler analysis of the storms found that the +CG dominant storms had a much larger volume of >10 m s-1 updraft than the -CG dominant storms, which may contribute to the production of the inverted charge structure. The +CG dominant storms also had larger graupel echo volumes, consistent with the larger updraft volumes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Anderson, Amanda R. S., author","Rutledge, Steven, advisor","Lang, Timothy, committee member","van den Heever, Sue, committee member","Robinson, R. Steven, committee member"],"institution":"Colorado State University. Libraries","degree_name":"Master of Science (M.S.)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Atmospheric Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011","date_published":"2011","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:13:04Z","subjects":["lightning","regional comparison","positive dominance"],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018536"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018536","href":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018536","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10217/48105","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Anderson, Amanda R. S., author","Rutledge, Steven, advisor","Lang, Timothy, committee member","van den Heever, Sue, committee member","Robinson, R. Steven, committee member"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2007-01-03T05:34:10Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2007-01-03T05:34:10Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2011"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Colorado State University. Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Atmospheric Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (M.S.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Colorado State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["lightning","regional comparison","positive dominance"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["Anderson_colostate_0053N_10537.pdf"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10217/48105","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018536"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["A statistical framework for analyzing storm data, called CLEAR (Colorado State University Lightning, Environment, Aerosols, and Radar), was used to examine the characteristics of seven storms in three different regions of the contiguous United States. Regions included the High Plains (eastern Colorado/western Kansas), central Oklahoma, and northern Alabama. Dual-polarization radar, lightning mapping array observations, and environmental reanalysis data were ingested by CLEAR to objectively assign lightning and environmental information to tracked storms. Comparison of environmental characteristics of the positive cloud-to-ground lightning (+CG) and negative cloud-to-ground lightning (-CG) dominant storms in the three regions showed no clear environmental difference between storms of different CG polarity dominance or between the regions themselves. Analysis of the lightning data showed the layer of maximum Very High Frequency (VHF) source density, inferred to be the positive charge layer, of the +CG dominant storms was at a much lower height (warmer temperature) than that of the -CG dominant storms. This indicated the probable existence of an inverted charge structure in the +CG dominant storms and supports previous research that suggested inverted charge as a cause of +CG dominance. Additionally, dual-Doppler analysis of the storms found that the +CG dominant storms had a much larger volume of >10 m s-1 updraft than the -CG dominant storms, which may contribute to the production of the inverted charge structure. The +CG dominant storms also had larger graupel echo volumes, consistent with the larger updraft volumes."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["born digital","masters theses"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparison of positive and negative cloud-to-ground lightning dominant storms in three regions of the United States"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Anderson, Amanda R. S., author","Rutledge, Steven, advisor","Lang, Timothy, committee member","van den Heever, Sue, committee member","Robinson, R. Steven, committee member"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2007-01-03T05:34:10Z"],"dc:date.available":["2007-01-03T05:34:10Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2011"],"dc:description.abstract":["A statistical framework for analyzing storm data, called CLEAR (Colorado State University Lightning, Environment, Aerosols, and Radar), was used to examine the characteristics of seven storms in three different regions of the contiguous United States. Regions included the High Plains (eastern Colorado/western Kansas), central Oklahoma, and northern Alabama. Dual-polarization radar, lightning mapping array observations, and environmental reanalysis data were ingested by CLEAR to objectively assign lightning and environmental information to tracked storms. Comparison of environmental characteristics of the positive cloud-to-ground lightning (+CG) and negative cloud-to-ground lightning (-CG) dominant storms in the three regions showed no clear environmental difference between storms of different CG polarity dominance or between the regions themselves. Analysis of the lightning data showed the layer of maximum Very High Frequency (VHF) source density, inferred to be the positive charge layer, of the +CG dominant storms was at a much lower height (warmer temperature) than that of the -CG dominant storms. This indicated the probable existence of an inverted charge structure in the +CG dominant storms and supports previous research that suggested inverted charge as a cause of +CG dominance. Additionally, dual-Doppler analysis of the storms found that the +CG dominant storms had a much larger volume of >10 m s-1 updraft than the -CG dominant storms, which may contribute to the production of the inverted charge structure. The +CG dominant storms also had larger graupel echo volumes, consistent with the larger updraft volumes."],"dc:format.medium":["born digital","masters theses"],"dc:identifier":["Anderson_colostate_0053N_10537.pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10217/48105","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018536"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Colorado State University. Libraries"],"dc:rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"dc:subject":["lightning","regional comparison","positive dominance"],"dc:title":["Comparison of positive and negative cloud-to-ground lightning dominant storms in three regions of the United States"],"dc:type":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Atmospheric Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (M.S.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["Colorado State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:13:04Z"}