{"id":{"repo_id":"colostate","oai_identifier":"oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/244005"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/colostate/oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/244005","repository":{"repo_id":"colostate","name":"Colorado State University","base_url":"https://api.mountainscholar.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A phenomenological analysis of masculinity ideologies among college males","abstract":"It was argued that use of qualitative methodology, rather than continued use of extant quantitative measures, is necessary in order for current masculinity ideologies to be fully documented. The 245 male, undergraduate student participants completed the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI) of Levant et al. (1992) and the Gender Role Conflict Scale of O'Neil et al. (1986). Of these, 29 also participated in an in-depth interview designed to elicit their experiences of masculinity ideology. Constant comparative analysis of the interview data revealed two core relevant themes. The first theme was that these students did have a consistent understanding of the masculinity ideology that they held for themselves and observed in society. Although this ideology corresponds highly to extant descriptions of masculinity ideology, there were also important differences. These differences included characteristics of nurturing others and expressiveness, at least in the context of one's family, that have typically been attributed solely to feminine ideology. The second theme was that these students also experienced ambivalence and uncertainty about the demands of this ideology. These results support the conclusion that these men are struggling with some changes in the traditional masculinity ideology. The data are also consistent with constructionist theories of gender which assert that differences in masculinity ideologies between groups are attributable to differences in status within society rather than differences in culture. It is suggested that future research include participants from a wider demographic range. It is also suggested that the interviews themselves would provide an ideal source from which to draw items for a more current quantitative measure of masculinity ideology.","abstract_html":"It was argued that use of qualitative methodology, rather than continued use of extant quantitative measures, is necessary in order for current masculinity ideologies to be fully documented. The 245 male, undergraduate student participants completed the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI) of Levant et al. (1992) and the Gender Role Conflict Scale of O'Neil et al. (1986). Of these, 29 also participated in an in-depth interview designed to elicit their experiences of masculinity ideology. Constant comparative analysis of the interview data revealed two core relevant themes. The first theme was that these students did have a consistent understanding of the masculinity ideology that they held for themselves and observed in society. Although this ideology corresponds highly to extant descriptions of masculinity ideology, there were also important differences. These differences included characteristics of nurturing others and expressiveness, at least in the context of one's family, that have typically been attributed solely to feminine ideology. The second theme was that these students also experienced ambivalence and uncertainty about the demands of this ideology. These results support the conclusion that these men are struggling with some changes in the traditional masculinity ideology. The data are also consistent with constructionist theories of gender which assert that differences in masculinity ideologies between groups are attributable to differences in status within society rather than differences in culture. It is suggested that future research include participants from a wider demographic range. It is also suggested that the interviews themselves would provide an ideal source from which to draw items for a more current quantitative measure of masculinity ideology.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gale, Steven R., author","Rickard, Kathryn M., advisor","Viney, Wayne, committee member","Cropanzano, Russell, committee member","Zimmerman, Toni, committee member"],"institution":"Colorado State University. Libraries","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1999,"date_issued":"1999","date_published":"1999","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:13:20Z","subjects":["social psychology","personality","personality psychology"],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://doi.org/10.25675/3.026671"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.026671","href":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.026671","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10217/244005","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gale, Steven R., author","Rickard, Kathryn M., advisor","Viney, Wayne, committee member","Cropanzano, Russell, committee member","Zimmerman, Toni, committee member"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-04-06T18:23:56Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1999"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Colorado State University. Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Colorado State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["social psychology","personality","personality psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10217/244005","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.026671"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["It was argued that use of qualitative methodology, rather than continued use of extant quantitative measures, is necessary in order for current masculinity ideologies to be fully documented. The 245 male, undergraduate student participants completed the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI) of Levant et al. (1992) and the Gender Role Conflict Scale of O'Neil et al. (1986). Of these, 29 also participated in an in-depth interview designed to elicit their experiences of masculinity ideology. Constant comparative analysis of the interview data revealed two core relevant themes. The first theme was that these students did have a consistent understanding of the masculinity ideology that they held for themselves and observed in society. Although this ideology corresponds highly to extant descriptions of masculinity ideology, there were also important differences. These differences included characteristics of nurturing others and expressiveness, at least in the context of one's family, that have typically been attributed solely to feminine ideology. The second theme was that these students also experienced ambivalence and uncertainty about the demands of this ideology. These results support the conclusion that these men are struggling with some changes in the traditional masculinity ideology. The data are also consistent with constructionist theories of gender which assert that differences in masculinity ideologies between groups are attributable to differences in status within society rather than differences in culture. It is suggested that future research include participants from a wider demographic range. It is also suggested that the interviews themselves would provide an ideal source from which to draw items for a more current quantitative measure of masculinity ideology."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["doctoral dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A phenomenological analysis of masculinity ideologies among college males"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Gale, Steven R., author","Rickard, Kathryn M., advisor","Viney, Wayne, committee member","Cropanzano, Russell, committee member","Zimmerman, Toni, committee member"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-04-06T18:23:56Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1999"],"dc:description.abstract":["It was argued that use of qualitative methodology, rather than continued use of extant quantitative measures, is necessary in order for current masculinity ideologies to be fully documented. The 245 male, undergraduate student participants completed the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI) of Levant et al. (1992) and the Gender Role Conflict Scale of O'Neil et al. (1986). Of these, 29 also participated in an in-depth interview designed to elicit their experiences of masculinity ideology. Constant comparative analysis of the interview data revealed two core relevant themes. The first theme was that these students did have a consistent understanding of the masculinity ideology that they held for themselves and observed in society. Although this ideology corresponds highly to extant descriptions of masculinity ideology, there were also important differences. These differences included characteristics of nurturing others and expressiveness, at least in the context of one's family, that have typically been attributed solely to feminine ideology. The second theme was that these students also experienced ambivalence and uncertainty about the demands of this ideology. These results support the conclusion that these men are struggling with some changes in the traditional masculinity ideology. The data are also consistent with constructionist theories of gender which assert that differences in masculinity ideologies between groups are attributable to differences in status within society rather than differences in culture. It is suggested that future research include participants from a wider demographic range. It is also suggested that the interviews themselves would provide an ideal source from which to draw items for a more current quantitative measure of masculinity ideology."],"dc:format.medium":["doctoral dissertations"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10217/244005","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.026671"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Colorado State University. Libraries"],"dc:rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"dc:subject":["social psychology","personality","personality psychology"],"dc:title":["A phenomenological analysis of masculinity ideologies among college males"],"dc:type":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["Colorado State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:13:20Z"}