{"id":{"repo_id":"colostate","oai_identifier":"oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/166962"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/colostate/oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/166962","repository":{"repo_id":"colostate","name":"Colorado State University","base_url":"https://api.mountainscholar.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Effectiveness and acceptability of congestion pricing","abstract":"Urban congestion is a pervasive and growing problem in developed and developing countries. The lack of excludability for scarce urban space, specifically roads and parking spaces, creates a common resource problem yielding a congestion externality that generates many external costs. Marginal social cost pricing has long been advocated as a means of alleviating market failures resulting from such negative (environmental) externalities. Congestion pricing comes in numerous forms (e.g., tolls on roads or express lanes), but has only been sporadically adopted despite congestion being a growing problem. The literature argues that concerns on equity and fairness issues and revenue redistribution are major hurdles of making an effective congestion pricing policy politically feasible and publicly acceptable. This dissertation investigates the effectiveness and acceptability of congestion pricing schemes in different contexts and examines whether individual beliefs in addition to the objective welfare effects determine voter acceptability. The first chapter employs laboratory experiments to examine the evolution of voting behavior after individuals become accustomed to the congestion problem and the congestion pricing policy, and the nature of the experience from the congestion policy. The congestion pricing policy exogenously creates inequitable outcomes which in some cases makes some people worse off. The second chapter develops and examines a three-player bottleneck congestion game and examines the ex-ante and ex-post welfare implications of an \\textit{ex-ante} efficient tolling policy. The third chapter examines the effectiveness and acceptability of tolls in the three-player bottleneck congestion game using laboratory experiments where equity concerns are endogenously determined. The results suggest policymakers should be open to and considerate of the equity effects, the characteristics and beliefs of their constituents, and how to earmark revenues before implementing efficiency enhancing environmental policies.","abstract_html":"Urban congestion is a pervasive and growing problem in developed and developing countries. The lack of excludability for scarce urban space, specifically roads and parking spaces, creates a common resource problem yielding a congestion externality that generates many external costs. Marginal social cost pricing has long been advocated as a means of alleviating market failures resulting from such negative (environmental) externalities. Congestion pricing comes in numerous forms (e.g., tolls on roads or express lanes), but has only been sporadically adopted despite congestion being a growing problem. The literature argues that concerns on equity and fairness issues and revenue redistribution are major hurdles of making an effective congestion pricing policy politically feasible and publicly acceptable. This dissertation investigates the effectiveness and acceptability of congestion pricing schemes in different contexts and examines whether individual beliefs in addition to the objective welfare effects determine voter acceptability. The first chapter employs laboratory experiments to examine the evolution of voting behavior after individuals become accustomed to the congestion problem and the congestion pricing policy, and the nature of the experience from the congestion policy. The congestion pricing policy exogenously creates inequitable outcomes which in some cases makes some people worse off. The second chapter develops and examines a three-player bottleneck congestion game and examines the ex-ante and ex-post welfare implications of an \\textit{ex-ante} efficient tolling policy. The third chapter examines the effectiveness and acceptability of tolls in the three-player bottleneck congestion game using laboratory experiments where equity concerns are endogenously determined. The results suggest policymakers should be open to and considerate of the equity effects, the characteristics and beliefs of their constituents, and how to earmark revenues before implementing efficiency enhancing environmental policies.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Janusch, Nicholas Roger, author","Kroll, Stephan, advisor","Goemans, Christopher, committee member","Loomis, John, committee member","Mushinski, David, committee member"],"institution":"Colorado State University. Libraries","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Agricultural and Resource Economics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015","date_published":"2015","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:12:57Z","subjects":["congestion","incentive-based mechanisms","pricing","externality","acceptability","lab experiment"],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018363"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018363","href":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018363","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10217/166962","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Janusch, Nicholas Roger, author","Kroll, Stephan, advisor","Goemans, Christopher, committee member","Loomis, John, committee member","Mushinski, David, committee member"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-08-27T03:57:12Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-08-27T03:57:12Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2015"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Colorado State University. Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agricultural and Resource Economics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Colorado State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["congestion","incentive-based mechanisms","pricing","externality","acceptability","lab experiment"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["Janusch_colostate_0053A_12927.pdf"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10217/166962","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018363"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Urban congestion is a pervasive and growing problem in developed and developing countries. The lack of excludability for scarce urban space, specifically roads and parking spaces, creates a common resource problem yielding a congestion externality that generates many external costs. Marginal social cost pricing has long been advocated as a means of alleviating market failures resulting from such negative (environmental) externalities. Congestion pricing comes in numerous forms (e.g., tolls on roads or express lanes), but has only been sporadically adopted despite congestion being a growing problem. The literature argues that concerns on equity and fairness issues and revenue redistribution are major hurdles of making an effective congestion pricing policy politically feasible and publicly acceptable. This dissertation investigates the effectiveness and acceptability of congestion pricing schemes in different contexts and examines whether individual beliefs in addition to the objective welfare effects determine voter acceptability. The first chapter employs laboratory experiments to examine the evolution of voting behavior after individuals become accustomed to the congestion problem and the congestion pricing policy, and the nature of the experience from the congestion policy. The congestion pricing policy exogenously creates inequitable outcomes which in some cases makes some people worse off. The second chapter develops and examines a three-player bottleneck congestion game and examines the ex-ante and ex-post welfare implications of an \\textit{ex-ante} efficient tolling policy. The third chapter examines the effectiveness and acceptability of tolls in the three-player bottleneck congestion game using laboratory experiments where equity concerns are endogenously determined. The results suggest policymakers should be open to and considerate of the equity effects, the characteristics and beliefs of their constituents, and how to earmark revenues before implementing efficiency enhancing environmental policies."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["born digital","doctoral dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Effectiveness and acceptability of congestion pricing"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Janusch, Nicholas Roger, author","Kroll, Stephan, advisor","Goemans, Christopher, committee member","Loomis, John, committee member","Mushinski, David, committee member"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-08-27T03:57:12Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-08-27T03:57:12Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2015"],"dc:description.abstract":["Urban congestion is a pervasive and growing problem in developed and developing countries. The lack of excludability for scarce urban space, specifically roads and parking spaces, creates a common resource problem yielding a congestion externality that generates many external costs. Marginal social cost pricing has long been advocated as a means of alleviating market failures resulting from such negative (environmental) externalities. Congestion pricing comes in numerous forms (e.g., tolls on roads or express lanes), but has only been sporadically adopted despite congestion being a growing problem. The literature argues that concerns on equity and fairness issues and revenue redistribution are major hurdles of making an effective congestion pricing policy politically feasible and publicly acceptable. This dissertation investigates the effectiveness and acceptability of congestion pricing schemes in different contexts and examines whether individual beliefs in addition to the objective welfare effects determine voter acceptability. The first chapter employs laboratory experiments to examine the evolution of voting behavior after individuals become accustomed to the congestion problem and the congestion pricing policy, and the nature of the experience from the congestion policy. The congestion pricing policy exogenously creates inequitable outcomes which in some cases makes some people worse off. The second chapter develops and examines a three-player bottleneck congestion game and examines the ex-ante and ex-post welfare implications of an \\textit{ex-ante} efficient tolling policy. The third chapter examines the effectiveness and acceptability of tolls in the three-player bottleneck congestion game using laboratory experiments where equity concerns are endogenously determined. The results suggest policymakers should be open to and considerate of the equity effects, the characteristics and beliefs of their constituents, and how to earmark revenues before implementing efficiency enhancing environmental policies."],"dc:format.medium":["born digital","doctoral dissertations"],"dc:identifier":["Janusch_colostate_0053A_12927.pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10217/166962","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018363"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Colorado State University. Libraries"],"dc:rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"dc:subject":["congestion","incentive-based mechanisms","pricing","externality","acceptability","lab experiment"],"dc:title":["Effectiveness and acceptability of congestion pricing"],"dc:type":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agricultural and Resource Economics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["Colorado State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:12:57Z"}