{"id":{"repo_id":"colo-mines","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.mines.edu:11124/170640"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/colo-mines/oai:repository.mines.edu:11124/170640","repository":{"repo_id":"colo-mines","name":"Colorado School of Mines","base_url":"https://repository.mines.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Potential of cross laminated timber in single family residential construction","abstract":"Cross laminated timber (CLT) is a panelized engineered wood product that is gaining popularity in the United States as a structural material for massive timber buildings. CLT is shown to be cost competitive to steel and concrete in large building construction projects, but is seen as uncompetitive for smaller scale projects, especially light frame wood (LFW) residential construction. The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed comparison of the cost to construct a CLT home versus a LFW home to quantify the cost difference between both options in the single family home (SFH) market. Based on a realistic floor plan, three different designs were compared based on cost and construction timeline to determine the realistic cost differences between SFH constructions using LFW or CLT. The final results show that the CLT option results in a 21% increase in total construction cost from the LFW option. While it is difficult to justify this cost increase in Colorado, potential benefit of CLT construction against natural hazards may make a CLT house cost-effective for hurricane or tornado prone regions.","abstract_html":"Cross laminated timber (CLT) is a panelized engineered wood product that is gaining popularity in the United States as a structural material for massive timber buildings. CLT is shown to be cost competitive to steel and concrete in large building construction projects, but is seen as uncompetitive for smaller scale projects, especially light frame wood (LFW) residential construction. The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed comparison of the cost to construct a CLT home versus a LFW home to quantify the cost difference between both options in the single family home (SFH) market. Based on a realistic floor plan, three different designs were compared based on cost and construction timeline to determine the realistic cost differences between SFH constructions using LFW or CLT. The final results show that the CLT option results in a 21% increase in total construction cost from the LFW option. While it is difficult to justify this cost increase in Colorado, potential benefit of CLT construction against natural hazards may make a CLT house cost-effective for hurricane or tornado prone regions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Burback, Brad"],"institution":"Colorado School of Mines. Arthur Lakes Library","degree_name":"Master of Science (M.S.)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Pei, Shiling"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Crocker, Joseph P.","Kiousis, Panagiotis Demetrios, 1956-","Davis, Graham A."],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016","date_published":"2016","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:43:19Z","subjects":["cross laminated timber","residential","cost estimation","single family home","light frame wood"],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":["Copyright of the original work is retained by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["T 8194"],"render_values":[{"text":"T 8194","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/11124/170640","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Pei, Shiling"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Crocker, Joseph P.","Kiousis, Panagiotis Demetrios, 1956-","Davis, Graham A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Burback, Brad"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2017-01-19T21:59:18Z","2022-02-03T12:56:20Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-01-19T21:59:18Z","2022-02-03T12:56:20Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2016"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Colorado School of Mines. Arthur Lakes Library"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil and Environmental Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (M.S.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Colorado School of Mines"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["cross laminated timber","residential","cost estimation","single family home","light frame wood"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright of the original work is retained by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["T 8194"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/11124/170640"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Includes bibliographical references.","2016 Fall."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Cross laminated timber (CLT) is a panelized engineered wood product that is gaining popularity in the United States as a structural material for massive timber buildings. CLT is shown to be cost competitive to steel and concrete in large building construction projects, but is seen as uncompetitive for smaller scale projects, especially light frame wood (LFW) residential construction. The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed comparison of the cost to construct a CLT home versus a LFW home to quantify the cost difference between both options in the single family home (SFH) market. Based on a realistic floor plan, three different designs were compared based on cost and construction timeline to determine the realistic cost differences between SFH constructions using LFW or CLT. The final results show that the CLT option results in a 21% increase in total construction cost from the LFW option. While it is difficult to justify this cost increase in Colorado, potential benefit of CLT construction against natural hazards may make a CLT house cost-effective for hurricane or tornado prone regions."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["born digital","masters theses"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Potential of cross laminated timber in single family residential construction"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Pei, Shiling"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Crocker, Joseph P.","Kiousis, Panagiotis Demetrios, 1956-","Davis, Graham A."],"dc:creator":["Burback, Brad"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2017-01-19T21:59:18Z","2022-02-03T12:56:20Z"],"dc:date.available":["2017-01-19T21:59:18Z","2022-02-03T12:56:20Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2016"],"dc:description":["Includes bibliographical references.","2016 Fall."],"dc:description.abstract":["Cross laminated timber (CLT) is a panelized engineered wood product that is gaining popularity in the United States as a structural material for massive timber buildings. CLT is shown to be cost competitive to steel and concrete in large building construction projects, but is seen as uncompetitive for smaller scale projects, especially light frame wood (LFW) residential construction. The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed comparison of the cost to construct a CLT home versus a LFW home to quantify the cost difference between both options in the single family home (SFH) market. Based on a realistic floor plan, three different designs were compared based on cost and construction timeline to determine the realistic cost differences between SFH constructions using LFW or CLT. The final results show that the CLT option results in a 21% increase in total construction cost from the LFW option. While it is difficult to justify this cost increase in Colorado, potential benefit of CLT construction against natural hazards may make a CLT house cost-effective for hurricane or tornado prone regions."],"dc:format.medium":["born digital","masters theses"],"dc:identifier":["T 8194"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/11124/170640"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Colorado School of Mines. Arthur Lakes Library"],"dc:rights":["Copyright of the original work is retained by the author."],"dc:subject":["cross laminated timber","residential","cost estimation","single family home","light frame wood"],"dc:title":["Potential of cross laminated timber in single family residential construction"],"dc:type":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil and Environmental Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (M.S.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["Colorado School of Mines"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:43:19Z"}