{"id":{"repo_id":"claremont","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarship.claremont.edu:cgu_etd-1681"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/claremont/oai:scholarship.claremont.edu:cgu_etd-1681","repository":{"repo_id":"claremont","name":"Claremont Graduate University","base_url":"https://scholarship.claremont.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Wall We Need: The Necessity for Judicial Hostility Towards Religion and Mistakes Made by the Supreme Court Regarding the Separation of Church and State","abstract":"<p>In 1952, in a case held to permit early release of students from school in order to attend religious study off campus, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that, “[W]e find no Constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion.” This Thesis argues the opposite: that government hostility towards religion is, in fact, necessary, both Constitutionally and for prudence’s sake.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;In 1952, in a case held to permit early release of students from school in order to attend religious study off campus, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that, “[W]e find no Constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion.” This Thesis argues the opposite: that government hostility towards religion is, in fact, necessary, both Constitutionally and for prudence’s sake.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["King, Darin"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Religion, MA","degree_level":"Open Access Master's Thesis","degree_discipline":"School of Arts and Humanities","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Matthew Bowman"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2020-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:40:28Z","subjects":["Church","Law","Religion","Separation","State"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/659","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Matthew Bowman"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["King, Darin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-01-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["School of Arts and Humanities"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Open Access Master's Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Religion, MA"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Church","Law","Religion","Separation","State"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/659"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>In 1952, in a case held to permit early release of students from school in order to attend religious study off campus, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that, “[W]e find no Constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion.” This Thesis argues the opposite: that government hostility towards religion is, in fact, necessary, both Constitutionally and for prudence’s sake.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Wall We Need: The Necessity for Judicial Hostility Towards Religion and Mistakes Made by the Supreme Court Regarding the Separation of Church and State"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Matthew Bowman"],"dc:creator":["King, Darin"],"dc:date.available":["2023-01-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>In 1952, in a case held to permit early release of students from school in order to attend religious study off campus, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that, “[W]e find no Constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion.” This Thesis argues the opposite: that government hostility towards religion is, in fact, necessary, both Constitutionally and for prudence’s sake.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/659"],"dc:subject":["Church","Law","Religion","Separation","State"],"dc:title":["The Wall We Need: The Necessity for Judicial Hostility Towards Religion and Mistakes Made by the Supreme Court Regarding the Separation of Church and State"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["School of Arts and Humanities"],"thesis:degree_level":["Open Access Master's Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Religion, MA"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:40:28Z"}