Major conflicts between ascending challengers and dominant powers, competing for leadership in the international community, have profoundly altered the international structure. Political scientists’ efforts to propose generalizable theories about the causes of major conflicts often overlook domestic political factors and limitations of the empirical approaches. Thus, this dissertation proposes theories to understand how domestic political factors (domestic popular support for government leadership at the national level), international systemic conditions (external satisfaction with the status quo at the systemic level), and their interactions influence the likelihood of major conflicts between a dominant power and a competing power during the power transition period. This dissertation creates text data using dictionary-based textural analysis to measure the two key variables: domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction. Using ordinal logistic regressions (the partial proportional odds models), this dissertation empirically estimates the effect of interactions between domestic and international factors on the likelihood of power transition conflicts. According to the empirical findings of this research, this study is in accordance with the power transition theory that power parity between challengers and defenders is highly likely to cause conflicts during power transition periods. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that a challenger’s domestic satisfaction interacting with bilateral satisfaction has a statistically significant effect on the likelihood of conflicts. The effect of domestic satisfaction, bilateral satisfaction, and their interactions vary across four categories of the outcome of power transitions. The interaction of challenger’s domestic and bilateral satisfaction tends to decrease the probability of conflicts, for the categories of major conflicts and confrontation, while the interaction tends to increase the likelihood of competition or cooperation. Challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction increase the likelihood of cooperation or competition; conversely, decreasing the likelihood of confrontation or major conflicts. The effects of challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction on the outcomes of power transitions are statistically insignificant, respectively.
","abstract_html":"<p>Major conflicts between ascending challengers and dominant powers, competing for leadership in the international community, have profoundly altered the international structure. Political scientists’ efforts to propose generalizable theories about the causes of major conflicts often overlook domestic political factors and limitations of the empirical approaches. Thus, this dissertation proposes theories to understand how domestic political factors (domestic popular support for government leadership at the national level), international systemic conditions (external satisfaction with the status quo at the systemic level), and their interactions influence the likelihood of major conflicts between a dominant power and a competing power during the power transition period. This dissertation creates text data using dictionary-based textural analysis to measure the two key variables: domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction. Using ordinal logistic regressions (the partial proportional odds models), this dissertation empirically estimates the effect of interactions between domestic and international factors on the likelihood of power transition conflicts. According to the empirical findings of this research, this study is in accordance with the power transition theory that power parity between challengers and defenders is highly likely to cause conflicts during power transition periods. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that a challenger’s domestic satisfaction interacting with bilateral satisfaction has a statistically significant effect on the likelihood of conflicts. The effect of domestic satisfaction, bilateral satisfaction, and their interactions vary across four categories of the outcome of power transitions. The interaction of challenger’s domestic and bilateral satisfaction tends to decrease the probability of conflicts, for the categories of major conflicts and confrontation, while the interaction tends to increase the likelihood of competition or cooperation. Challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction increase the likelihood of cooperation or competition; conversely, decreasing the likelihood of confrontation or major conflicts. The effects of challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction on the outcomes of power transitions are statistically insignificant, respectively.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["An, Jingjing"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Political Science, PhD","degree_level":"Restricted to Claremont Colleges Dissertation","degree_discipline":"School of Social Science, Politics, and Evaluation","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Yi Feng","Melissa Rogers","David Arase"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2022-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:41:01Z","subjects":["Political Science"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/504","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Yi Feng","Melissa Rogers","David Arase"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["An, Jingjing"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2027-01-26T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["School of Social Science, Politics, and Evaluation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Restricted to Claremont Colleges Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Political Science, PhD"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Political Science"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/504"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Major conflicts between ascending challengers and dominant powers, competing for leadership in the international community, have profoundly altered the international structure. Political scientists’ efforts to propose generalizable theories about the causes of major conflicts often overlook domestic political factors and limitations of the empirical approaches. Thus, this dissertation proposes theories to understand how domestic political factors (domestic popular support for government leadership at the national level), international systemic conditions (external satisfaction with the status quo at the systemic level), and their interactions influence the likelihood of major conflicts between a dominant power and a competing power during the power transition period. This dissertation creates text data using dictionary-based textural analysis to measure the two key variables: domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction. Using ordinal logistic regressions (the partial proportional odds models), this dissertation empirically estimates the effect of interactions between domestic and international factors on the likelihood of power transition conflicts. According to the empirical findings of this research, this study is in accordance with the power transition theory that power parity between challengers and defenders is highly likely to cause conflicts during power transition periods. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that a challenger’s domestic satisfaction interacting with bilateral satisfaction has a statistically significant effect on the likelihood of conflicts. The effect of domestic satisfaction, bilateral satisfaction, and their interactions vary across four categories of the outcome of power transitions. The interaction of challenger’s domestic and bilateral satisfaction tends to decrease the probability of conflicts, for the categories of major conflicts and confrontation, while the interaction tends to increase the likelihood of competition or cooperation. Challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction increase the likelihood of cooperation or competition; conversely, decreasing the likelihood of confrontation or major conflicts. The effects of challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction on the outcomes of power transitions are statistically insignificant, respectively.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["What Causes Power Transition Conflicts?: Evidence from Interactions between International and Domestic Politics"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Yi Feng","Melissa Rogers","David Arase"],"dc:creator":["An, Jingjing"],"dc:date.available":["2027-01-26T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Major conflicts between ascending challengers and dominant powers, competing for leadership in the international community, have profoundly altered the international structure. Political scientists’ efforts to propose generalizable theories about the causes of major conflicts often overlook domestic political factors and limitations of the empirical approaches. Thus, this dissertation proposes theories to understand how domestic political factors (domestic popular support for government leadership at the national level), international systemic conditions (external satisfaction with the status quo at the systemic level), and their interactions influence the likelihood of major conflicts between a dominant power and a competing power during the power transition period. This dissertation creates text data using dictionary-based textural analysis to measure the two key variables: domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction. Using ordinal logistic regressions (the partial proportional odds models), this dissertation empirically estimates the effect of interactions between domestic and international factors on the likelihood of power transition conflicts. According to the empirical findings of this research, this study is in accordance with the power transition theory that power parity between challengers and defenders is highly likely to cause conflicts during power transition periods. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that a challenger’s domestic satisfaction interacting with bilateral satisfaction has a statistically significant effect on the likelihood of conflicts. The effect of domestic satisfaction, bilateral satisfaction, and their interactions vary across four categories of the outcome of power transitions. The interaction of challenger’s domestic and bilateral satisfaction tends to decrease the probability of conflicts, for the categories of major conflicts and confrontation, while the interaction tends to increase the likelihood of competition or cooperation. Challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction increase the likelihood of cooperation or competition; conversely, decreasing the likelihood of confrontation or major conflicts. The effects of challenger’s domestic satisfaction and bilateral satisfaction on the outcomes of power transitions are statistically insignificant, respectively.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/504"],"dc:subject":["Political Science"],"dc:title":["What Causes Power Transition Conflicts?: Evidence from Interactions between International and Domestic Politics"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["School of Social Science, Politics, and Evaluation"],"thesis:degree_level":["Restricted to Claremont Colleges Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Political Science, PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:41:01Z"}