Social movements can be an effective strategy through which to influence social change. However, setbacks and failures are often a part of the social movement process. Why then, in the face of failure do social movements persist? This pair of studies tested a proposed framework that drew from social identity and attribution literature in exploring the joint effects of group identification and attribution making in predicting social movement persistence. Study 1 was an experimental design conducted with a sample of 198 students that tested the first half of the framework to assess strength of identification as a moderator on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and the locus of causality, controllability and stability of the causes attributed to the outcome. Study 2 was conducted with 191 participants in the context of a real social movement and assessed the mediating effect of locus of causality, controllability, and stability on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign, and the mediating effect of expectancy for future success on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and social movement persistence. Results from these studies suggest that the success of a collective action campaign predicts social movement persistence only to the extent that expectancy for future success is high. Expectancy for future success is predicted by the extent to which the causes of the campaign outcome are internal or controllable by the social movement group. Furthermore, the degree to which social movement participants attribute the campaign to internal and controllable causes is dependent on the strength of identification with the social movement group. The discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the findings for understanding social movement persistence, and particularly persistence under conditions of failure or low group performance.
","abstract_html":"<p>Social movements can be an effective strategy through which to influence social change. However, setbacks and failures are often a part of the social movement process. Why then, in the face of failure do social movements persist? This pair of studies tested a proposed framework that drew from social identity and attribution literature in exploring the joint effects of group identification and attribution making in predicting social movement persistence. Study 1 was an experimental design conducted with a sample of 198 students that tested the first half of the framework to assess strength of identification as a moderator on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and the locus of causality, controllability and stability of the causes attributed to the outcome. Study 2 was conducted with 191 participants in the context of a real social movement and assessed the mediating effect of locus of causality, controllability, and stability on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign, and the mediating effect of expectancy for future success on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and social movement persistence. Results from these studies suggest that the success of a collective action campaign predicts social movement persistence only to the extent that expectancy for future success is high. Expectancy for future success is predicted by the extent to which the causes of the campaign outcome are internal or controllable by the social movement group. Furthermore, the degree to which social movement participants attribute the campaign to internal and controllable causes is dependent on the strength of identification with the social movement group. The discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the findings for understanding social movement persistence, and particularly persistence under conditions of failure or low group performance.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dudley, Deryn Maia"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Psychology, PhD","degree_level":"Open Access Dissertation","degree_discipline":"School of Social Science, Politics, and Evaluation","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Michael Hogg","Tarek Azzam","Linda Tropp"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2019-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:39:50Z","subjects":["attribution","collective action","group identity","social movement","Psychology","Social Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/363","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Michael Hogg","Tarek Azzam","Linda Tropp"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dudley, Deryn Maia"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-04-18T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["School of Social Science, Politics, and Evaluation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Open Access Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Psychology, PhD"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["attribution","collective action","group identity","social movement","Psychology","Social Psychology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/363"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Social movements can be an effective strategy through which to influence social change. However, setbacks and failures are often a part of the social movement process. Why then, in the face of failure do social movements persist? This pair of studies tested a proposed framework that drew from social identity and attribution literature in exploring the joint effects of group identification and attribution making in predicting social movement persistence. Study 1 was an experimental design conducted with a sample of 198 students that tested the first half of the framework to assess strength of identification as a moderator on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and the locus of causality, controllability and stability of the causes attributed to the outcome. Study 2 was conducted with 191 participants in the context of a real social movement and assessed the mediating effect of locus of causality, controllability, and stability on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign, and the mediating effect of expectancy for future success on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and social movement persistence. Results from these studies suggest that the success of a collective action campaign predicts social movement persistence only to the extent that expectancy for future success is high. Expectancy for future success is predicted by the extent to which the causes of the campaign outcome are internal or controllable by the social movement group. Furthermore, the degree to which social movement participants attribute the campaign to internal and controllable causes is dependent on the strength of identification with the social movement group. The discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the findings for understanding social movement persistence, and particularly persistence under conditions of failure or low group performance.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Sustained Social Movement Participation: Integration of Social Identity and Attribution Theories"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Michael Hogg","Tarek Azzam","Linda Tropp"],"dc:creator":["Dudley, Deryn Maia"],"dc:date.available":["2022-04-18T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Social movements can be an effective strategy through which to influence social change. However, setbacks and failures are often a part of the social movement process. Why then, in the face of failure do social movements persist? This pair of studies tested a proposed framework that drew from social identity and attribution literature in exploring the joint effects of group identification and attribution making in predicting social movement persistence. Study 1 was an experimental design conducted with a sample of 198 students that tested the first half of the framework to assess strength of identification as a moderator on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and the locus of causality, controllability and stability of the causes attributed to the outcome. Study 2 was conducted with 191 participants in the context of a real social movement and assessed the mediating effect of locus of causality, controllability, and stability on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign, and the mediating effect of expectancy for future success on the relationship between the outcome of a collective action campaign and social movement persistence. Results from these studies suggest that the success of a collective action campaign predicts social movement persistence only to the extent that expectancy for future success is high. Expectancy for future success is predicted by the extent to which the causes of the campaign outcome are internal or controllable by the social movement group. Furthermore, the degree to which social movement participants attribute the campaign to internal and controllable causes is dependent on the strength of identification with the social movement group. The discussion focuses on theoretical and practical implications of the findings for understanding social movement persistence, and particularly persistence under conditions of failure or low group performance.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/363"],"dc:subject":["attribution","collective action","group identity","social movement","Psychology","Social Psychology"],"dc:title":["Sustained Social Movement Participation: Integration of Social Identity and Attribution Theories"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["School of Social Science, Politics, and Evaluation"],"thesis:degree_level":["Open Access Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Psychology, PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:39:50Z"}