This dissertation will examine philanthropy and capital in Los Angeles in two parts: the first to produce a breakdown of the ideological assumptions of the most dominant forms of philanthropy in the United States—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns. The second part offers case studies for each of these forms to illustrate how the various institutional applications of philanthropy within the unique context of Los Angeles contribute to the transformation of the philanthropic model through the exchange of capital. Together, these chapters uncover distinct site-specific efforts that led to the successful active engagement of the citizenry in philanthropy, reducing the fundamental inequities of participation in the exchange of capital, resulting in the increased potential of serving the public good. By expanding beyond the criticisms of the exploitative foundations of philanthropy, I offer a reinterpretation of the notion that philanthropy is a technology of power that disseminates economic, social, and cultural control. Instead of upholding the values of the elite through reproducing a system that serves to remedy the exploitation of the relations of production, I reimagine philanthropy’s methodologies as a means to include the citizenry more openly as an active social subject.
Ultimately, this dissertation evaluates the comparative efficacy of the three major philanthropic forms—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns—as they adapt to the dispersed social landscapes of Los Angeles during the 20th century. By expanding a
cultural studies theoretical framework to investigate the understudied field of philanthropy, this dissertation illustrates a genealogical approach to philanthropy facilitated by Los Angeles’s foundational cultural institutions: the Hollywood Bowl, the Music Center, and the Los Angeles Public Library. Tracing each form of philanthropy through these institutions provides the opportunity to question and compare how their respective philanthropic efforts have contributed to the adaptation of applied transference of capital as a methodology to engage multiple subsets of the citizenry for the public good.
","abstract_html":"<p>This dissertation will examine philanthropy and capital in Los Angeles in two parts: the first to produce a breakdown of the ideological assumptions of the most dominant forms of philanthropy in the United States—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns. The second part offers case studies for each of these forms to illustrate how the various institutional applications of philanthropy within the unique context of Los Angeles contribute to the transformation of the philanthropic model through the exchange of capital. Together, these chapters uncover distinct site-specific efforts that led to the successful active engagement of the citizenry in philanthropy, reducing the fundamental inequities of participation in the exchange of capital, resulting in the increased potential of serving the public good. By expanding beyond the criticisms of the exploitative foundations of philanthropy, I offer a reinterpretation of the notion that philanthropy is a technology of power that disseminates economic, social, and cultural control. Instead of upholding the values of the elite through reproducing a system that serves to remedy the exploitation of the relations of production, I reimagine philanthropy’s methodologies as a means to include the citizenry more openly as an active social subject.</p> <p>Ultimately, this dissertation evaluates the comparative efficacy of the three major philanthropic forms—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns—as they adapt to the dispersed social landscapes of Los Angeles during the 20th century. By expanding a</p> <p>cultural studies theoretical framework to investigate the understudied field of philanthropy, this dissertation illustrates a genealogical approach to philanthropy facilitated by Los Angeles’s foundational cultural institutions: the Hollywood Bowl, the Music Center, and the Los Angeles Public Library. Tracing each form of philanthropy through these institutions provides the opportunity to question and compare how their respective philanthropic efforts have contributed to the adaptation of applied transference of capital as a methodology to engage multiple subsets of the citizenry for the public good.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Picken, Kelsey"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Philosophy, PhD","degree_level":"Open Access Dissertation","degree_discipline":"School of Arts and Humanities","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["David Luis-Brown","Robert Klitgaard"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2021-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:40:36Z","subjects":["Campaign","Cultural Studies","Development","Fundraising","Los Angeles","Philanthropy"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/285","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["David Luis-Brown","Robert Klitgaard"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Picken, Kelsey"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-12-17T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["School of Arts and Humanities"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Open Access Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Philosophy, PhD"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Campaign","Cultural Studies","Development","Fundraising","Los Angeles","Philanthropy"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/285"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This dissertation will examine philanthropy and capital in Los Angeles in two parts: the first to produce a breakdown of the ideological assumptions of the most dominant forms of philanthropy in the United States—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns. The second part offers case studies for each of these forms to illustrate how the various institutional applications of philanthropy within the unique context of Los Angeles contribute to the transformation of the philanthropic model through the exchange of capital. Together, these chapters uncover distinct site-specific efforts that led to the successful active engagement of the citizenry in philanthropy, reducing the fundamental inequities of participation in the exchange of capital, resulting in the increased potential of serving the public good. By expanding beyond the criticisms of the exploitative foundations of philanthropy, I offer a reinterpretation of the notion that philanthropy is a technology of power that disseminates economic, social, and cultural control. Instead of upholding the values of the elite through reproducing a system that serves to remedy the exploitation of the relations of production, I reimagine philanthropy’s methodologies as a means to include the citizenry more openly as an active social subject.
Ultimately, this dissertation evaluates the comparative efficacy of the three major philanthropic forms—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns—as they adapt to the dispersed social landscapes of Los Angeles during the 20th century. By expanding a
cultural studies theoretical framework to investigate the understudied field of philanthropy, this dissertation illustrates a genealogical approach to philanthropy facilitated by Los Angeles’s foundational cultural institutions: the Hollywood Bowl, the Music Center, and the Los Angeles Public Library. Tracing each form of philanthropy through these institutions provides the opportunity to question and compare how their respective philanthropic efforts have contributed to the adaptation of applied transference of capital as a methodology to engage multiple subsets of the citizenry for the public good.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A City of Angels: Philanthropy and the Public Good in the Fragmented Metropolis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["David Luis-Brown","Robert Klitgaard"],"dc:creator":["Picken, Kelsey"],"dc:date.available":["2023-12-17T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This dissertation will examine philanthropy and capital in Los Angeles in two parts: the first to produce a breakdown of the ideological assumptions of the most dominant forms of philanthropy in the United States—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns. The second part offers case studies for each of these forms to illustrate how the various institutional applications of philanthropy within the unique context of Los Angeles contribute to the transformation of the philanthropic model through the exchange of capital. Together, these chapters uncover distinct site-specific efforts that led to the successful active engagement of the citizenry in philanthropy, reducing the fundamental inequities of participation in the exchange of capital, resulting in the increased potential of serving the public good. By expanding beyond the criticisms of the exploitative foundations of philanthropy, I offer a reinterpretation of the notion that philanthropy is a technology of power that disseminates economic, social, and cultural control. Instead of upholding the values of the elite through reproducing a system that serves to remedy the exploitation of the relations of production, I reimagine philanthropy’s methodologies as a means to include the citizenry more openly as an active social subject.
Ultimately, this dissertation evaluates the comparative efficacy of the three major philanthropic forms—big philanthropy, voluntary associations, and mass campaigns—as they adapt to the dispersed social landscapes of Los Angeles during the 20th century. By expanding a
cultural studies theoretical framework to investigate the understudied field of philanthropy, this dissertation illustrates a genealogical approach to philanthropy facilitated by Los Angeles’s foundational cultural institutions: the Hollywood Bowl, the Music Center, and the Los Angeles Public Library. Tracing each form of philanthropy through these institutions provides the opportunity to question and compare how their respective philanthropic efforts have contributed to the adaptation of applied transference of capital as a methodology to engage multiple subsets of the citizenry for the public good.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/285"],"dc:subject":["Campaign","Cultural Studies","Development","Fundraising","Los Angeles","Philanthropy"],"dc:title":["A City of Angels: Philanthropy and the Public Good in the Fragmented Metropolis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["School of Arts and Humanities"],"thesis:degree_level":["Open Access Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Philosophy, PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:40:36Z"}