Back to results

Claremont Graduate University

The God-World Relationship Between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>This dissertation investigates the God-world relationship between Joseph Bracken as a process theologian, Philip Clayton as a panentheist, and the open theism. They have affinities and differences as conversational partners in their multilayered relations. Their common question must be as follows: “What does it mean to believe in God today?” In this dissertation I compare their respectively theological perspectives and explore their affinities and differences. Many scholars have already noted more affinities than untenable differences among Bracken’s theology, Clayton’s panentheism, and the open theism. On the one hand, even though theological perspectives of Bracken and Clayton are obviously different from each other, they are both influenced in specific ways by Whitehead. On the other hand, open theism is a movement that emphasizes “the openness of God,” from within evangelical theism. The fact that there is even within classical theism the pursuit of new models of God such as revised classical theism or modified classical theism might suggest the need for contemporary models of God in philosophical theology.</p> <p>This dissertation will thus explore philosophical theologies that are proper both to the biblical faith and intellectual earnestness, that is, 居敬窮理 (geo (to live) kyeong (piety) kung (to acknowledge) li (reason)) in Eastern philosophy, which means distinctions but not separation between piety and intelligence, and that stand between classical theism and “orthodox” process theism. If there is no consistency among biblical, rational and existential descriptions of God, how can we establish philosophical theologies? Our theological task is to frame a new constructive theology whose primary aspect must synthesize both classical theism and process theology in the hermeneutical circle. For example, this new theism admits an infinitely qualitative difference between God and the world, as well as a really radical relation between God and the world. Aspects and domains do not encroach upon each other.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Religion, PhD
Level thesis:degree_level
Open Access Dissertation
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
School of Religion
Year dc:date.available
2012

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Park, Dong-Sik
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Anselm Kyungsuk Min
  • Ingolf U. Dalferth

Subjects

dc:subject × 8

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/43
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholarship.claremont.edu:cgu_etd-1031

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Claremont Graduate University
Base URL
scholarship.claremont.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Park, Dong-Sik. The God-World Relationship Between Joseph Bracken, Philip Clayton, and the Open Theism. Open Access Dissertation thesis, 2012. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/43