{"id":{"repo_id":"chapman","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.chapman.edu:cads_dissertations-1019"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/chapman/oai:digitalcommons.chapman.edu:cads_dissertations-1019","repository":{"repo_id":"chapman","name":"Chapman University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Novel Applications of Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Analyze Trial-Level Data from Cognitive Measures","abstract":"<p>Many cognitive tasks and measures can benefit from trial-level analyses including Item Response Theory models as well as other Bayesian and Machine Learning models. Specifically, this dissertation focuses mainly on task-based measures of metamemory and how within-set variability as well as item-level characteristics can improve the inferences researchers make about these measures.First, a clustering analysis of judgements of learning across a task is examined in order to detect different participant strategies on a metamemory task and whether strategy use differs by age. Second, the benefits of using item response theory models to analyze both individual and item-level differences in metamemory tasks are discussed, and applications to multiple datasets are provided. Third, an extended, hierarchical item response theory model was applied to the Child Risk Utility Measure, a tablet-based lab measure used to measure risk taking in preschool aged children. Finally, multiple Bayesian logistic based regression models (including a cumulative logit model, logistic regression model, and zero-one-inflated beta regression model) are applied to the metamemory task described previously to demonstrate the benefits of performing item-level analyses especially as it pertains to differences in the variability of judgements of learning in addition to mean differences between groups. Item or trial-level analyses have many benefits when applied to cognitive tasks and measures and can provide deeper insight into observed effects.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Many cognitive tasks and measures can benefit from trial-level analyses including Item Response Theory models as well as other Bayesian and Machine Learning models. Specifically, this dissertation focuses mainly on task-based measures of metamemory and how within-set variability as well as item-level characteristics can improve the inferences researchers make about these measures.First, a clustering analysis of judgements of learning across a task is examined in order to detect different participant strategies on a metamemory task and whether strategy use differs by age. Second, the benefits of using item response theory models to analyze both individual and item-level differences in metamemory tasks are discussed, and applications to multiple datasets are provided. Third, an extended, hierarchical item response theory model was applied to the Child Risk Utility Measure, a tablet-based lab measure used to measure risk taking in preschool aged children. Finally, multiple Bayesian logistic based regression models (including a cumulative logit model, logistic regression model, and zero-one-inflated beta regression model) are applied to the metamemory task described previously to demonstrate the benefits of performing item-level analyses especially as it pertains to differences in the variability of judgements of learning in addition to mean differences between groups. Item or trial-level analyses have many benefits when applied to cognitive tasks and measures and can provide deeper insight into observed effects.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Parlett, Chelsea"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Computational and Data Sciences","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Erik Linstead","Elizabeth Stevens","Susanne M. Jaeggi"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2021-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:38:16Z","subjects":["Bayesian","metamemory","item response theory","clustering","judgement of learning","Data Science"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cads_dissertations/19","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Erik Linstead","Elizabeth Stevens","Susanne M. Jaeggi"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Parlett, Chelsea"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-05-31T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Computational and Data Sciences"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Bayesian","metamemory","item response theory","clustering","judgement of learning","Data Science"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cads_dissertations/19"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Many cognitive tasks and measures can benefit from trial-level analyses including Item Response Theory models as well as other Bayesian and Machine Learning models. Specifically, this dissertation focuses mainly on task-based measures of metamemory and how within-set variability as well as item-level characteristics can improve the inferences researchers make about these measures.First, a clustering analysis of judgements of learning across a task is examined in order to detect different participant strategies on a metamemory task and whether strategy use differs by age. Second, the benefits of using item response theory models to analyze both individual and item-level differences in metamemory tasks are discussed, and applications to multiple datasets are provided. Third, an extended, hierarchical item response theory model was applied to the Child Risk Utility Measure, a tablet-based lab measure used to measure risk taking in preschool aged children. Finally, multiple Bayesian logistic based regression models (including a cumulative logit model, logistic regression model, and zero-one-inflated beta regression model) are applied to the metamemory task described previously to demonstrate the benefits of performing item-level analyses especially as it pertains to differences in the variability of judgements of learning in addition to mean differences between groups. Item or trial-level analyses have many benefits when applied to cognitive tasks and measures and can provide deeper insight into observed effects.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["C. Parlett, \"Novel applications of statistical and machine learning methods to analyze trial-level data from cognitive measures,\" Ph.D. dissertation, Chapman University, Orange, CA, 2021. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.36837/chapman.000273\">https://doi.org/10.36837/chapman.000273</a>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Novel Applications of Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Analyze Trial-Level Data from Cognitive Measures"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Erik Linstead","Elizabeth Stevens","Susanne M. Jaeggi"],"dc:creator":["Parlett, Chelsea"],"dc:date.available":["2022-05-31T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Many cognitive tasks and measures can benefit from trial-level analyses including Item Response Theory models as well as other Bayesian and Machine Learning models. Specifically, this dissertation focuses mainly on task-based measures of metamemory and how within-set variability as well as item-level characteristics can improve the inferences researchers make about these measures.First, a clustering analysis of judgements of learning across a task is examined in order to detect different participant strategies on a metamemory task and whether strategy use differs by age. Second, the benefits of using item response theory models to analyze both individual and item-level differences in metamemory tasks are discussed, and applications to multiple datasets are provided. Third, an extended, hierarchical item response theory model was applied to the Child Risk Utility Measure, a tablet-based lab measure used to measure risk taking in preschool aged children. Finally, multiple Bayesian logistic based regression models (including a cumulative logit model, logistic regression model, and zero-one-inflated beta regression model) are applied to the metamemory task described previously to demonstrate the benefits of performing item-level analyses especially as it pertains to differences in the variability of judgements of learning in addition to mean differences between groups. Item or trial-level analyses have many benefits when applied to cognitive tasks and measures and can provide deeper insight into observed effects.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cads_dissertations/19"],"dc:source":["C. Parlett, \"Novel applications of statistical and machine learning methods to analyze trial-level data from cognitive measures,\" Ph.D. dissertation, Chapman University, Orange, CA, 2021. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.36837/chapman.000273\">https://doi.org/10.36837/chapman.000273</a>"],"dc:subject":["Bayesian","metamemory","item response theory","clustering","judgement of learning","Data Science"],"dc:title":["Novel Applications of Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Analyze Trial-Level Data from Cognitive Measures"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Computational and Data Sciences"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:38:16Z"}