{"id":{"repo_id":"central-wash","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.cwu.edu:etd-1312"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/central-wash/oai:digitalcommons.cwu.edu:etd-1312","repository":{"repo_id":"central-wash","name":"Central Washington University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Effects of Feedback Sequence on Cognitive Performance","abstract":"The current study tested the effects of feedback sequence on performance on a visual-spatial task. Twenty-three female participants were randomly assigned to one of five feedback sequence conditions which occurred after two consecutive trials of a hole-punch task. The five feedback sequence conditions consisted of positive-positive (i.e., positive feedback followed by positive feedback), positive-negative, negative-positive, negative-negative, and a no-feedback control group. Positive feedback was presented as a 80%-90% accuracy range whereas negative feedback was a 30%-40% accuracy range. Third trial accuracy and completion time were measured as was locus of control via the Internal Control Index (ICI) survey. Analyses revealed an effect of feedback sequence on accuracy, but not on completion time. The no-feedback control group performed with lower accuracy than the negative-negative and positive-positive groups. Locus of control had no effect on performance, either by itself or as an interaction with feedback sequence. Differences in accuracy in the no-feedback group may have occurred due to heightened performance ambiguity in that condition.","abstract_html":"The current study tested the effects of feedback sequence on performance on a visual-spatial task. Twenty-three female participants were randomly assigned to one of five feedback sequence conditions which occurred after two consecutive trials of a hole-punch task. The five feedback sequence conditions consisted of positive-positive (i.e., positive feedback followed by positive feedback), positive-negative, negative-positive, negative-negative, and a no-feedback control group. Positive feedback was presented as a 80%-90% accuracy range whereas negative feedback was a 30%-40% accuracy range. Third trial accuracy and completion time were measured as was locus of control via the Internal Control Index (ICI) survey. Analyses revealed an effect of feedback sequence on accuracy, but not on completion time. The no-feedback control group performed with lower accuracy than the negative-negative and positive-positive groups. Locus of control had no effect on performance, either by itself or as an interaction with feedback sequence. Differences in accuracy in the no-feedback group may have occurred due to heightened performance ambiguity in that condition.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pyle, Travis W."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":"Experimental Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Kara Gabriel","Susan Lonborg","Jesse James"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2015-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:36:42Z","subjects":["Feedback","Cognitive Performance","Visual/Spatial","Locus of Control","Hole-Punch","Cognition and Perception","Cognitive Psychology","Personality and Social Contexts"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/316","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Kara Gabriel","Susan Lonborg","Jesse James"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pyle, Travis W."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-02-09T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Experimental Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Feedback","Cognitive Performance","Visual/Spatial","Locus of Control","Hole-Punch","Cognition and Perception","Cognitive Psychology","Personality and Social Contexts"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/316"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The current study tested the effects of feedback sequence on performance on a visual-spatial task. Twenty-three female participants were randomly assigned to one of five feedback sequence conditions which occurred after two consecutive trials of a hole-punch task. The five feedback sequence conditions consisted of positive-positive (i.e., positive feedback followed by positive feedback), positive-negative, negative-positive, negative-negative, and a no-feedback control group. Positive feedback was presented as a 80%-90% accuracy range whereas negative feedback was a 30%-40% accuracy range. Third trial accuracy and completion time were measured as was locus of control via the Internal Control Index (ICI) survey. Analyses revealed an effect of feedback sequence on accuracy, but not on completion time. The no-feedback control group performed with lower accuracy than the negative-negative and positive-positive groups. Locus of control had no effect on performance, either by itself or as an interaction with feedback sequence. Differences in accuracy in the no-feedback group may have occurred due to heightened performance ambiguity in that condition."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effects of Feedback Sequence on Cognitive Performance"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Kara Gabriel","Susan Lonborg","Jesse James"],"dc:creator":["Pyle, Travis W."],"dc:date.available":["2016-02-09T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The current study tested the effects of feedback sequence on performance on a visual-spatial task. Twenty-three female participants were randomly assigned to one of five feedback sequence conditions which occurred after two consecutive trials of a hole-punch task. The five feedback sequence conditions consisted of positive-positive (i.e., positive feedback followed by positive feedback), positive-negative, negative-positive, negative-negative, and a no-feedback control group. Positive feedback was presented as a 80%-90% accuracy range whereas negative feedback was a 30%-40% accuracy range. Third trial accuracy and completion time were measured as was locus of control via the Internal Control Index (ICI) survey. Analyses revealed an effect of feedback sequence on accuracy, but not on completion time. The no-feedback control group performed with lower accuracy than the negative-negative and positive-positive groups. Locus of control had no effect on performance, either by itself or as an interaction with feedback sequence. Differences in accuracy in the no-feedback group may have occurred due to heightened performance ambiguity in that condition."],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/316"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Feedback","Cognitive Performance","Visual/Spatial","Locus of Control","Hole-Punch","Cognition and Perception","Cognitive Psychology","Personality and Social Contexts"],"dc:title":["The Effects of Feedback Sequence on Cognitive Performance"],"dc:type":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Experimental Psychology"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:36:42Z"}