{"id":{"repo_id":"cent-lancashire","oai_identifier":"oai:clok.uclan.ac.uk:20733"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cent-lancashire/oai:clok.uclan.ac.uk:20733","repository":{"repo_id":"cent-lancashire","name":"University of Central Lancashire","base_url":"https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"The nature of delusion: An analysis of the contemporary philosophical debates","abstract":"The present thesis surveys different philosophical approaches to the nature of delusions: specifically, their ontology. However, since none of the various theories of the nature of delusions succeeds, I argue that there must be something problematic about the form of the analyses commonly offered. My general conclusion is that one cannot characterize delusions without taking away what it is distinctive about them.","abstract_html":"The present thesis surveys different philosophical approaches to the nature of delusions: specifically, their ontology. However, since none of the various theories of the nature of delusions succeeds, I argue that there must be something problematic about the form of the analyses commonly offered. My general conclusion is that one cannot characterize delusions without taking away what it is distinctive about them.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Paredes, Aline Aurora Maya"],"institution":"University of Central Lancashire","degree_name":"phd","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-06","date_published":"2017-06","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:36:16Z","subjects":["Philosophy"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":null,"outbound_label":null,"outbound_source":null},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Paredes, Aline Aurora Maya"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-06-01"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2017-06"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["School of Nursing"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Central Lancashire"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://knowledge.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/20733/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["phd"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://knowledge.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/20733/1/20733%20Paresed%20Aline%20Final%20e-Thesis%20%28Master%20Copy%29.pdf","https://knowledge.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/20733/2/20733%20Paredes%20Aline%20e-Thesis%20Submission%20Form.doc"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The present thesis surveys different philosophical approaches to the nature of delusions: specifically, their ontology. However, since none of the various theories of the nature of delusions succeeds, I argue that there must be something problematic about the form of the analyses commonly offered. My general conclusion is that one cannot characterize delusions without taking away what it is distinctive about them."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf","application/msword"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The nature of delusion: An analysis of the contemporary philosophical debates"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Paredes, Aline Aurora Maya"],"dc:date":["2017-06-01"],"dc:date.issued":["2017-06"],"dc:description.abstract":["The present thesis surveys different philosophical approaches to the nature of delusions: specifically, their ontology. However, since none of the various theories of the nature of delusions succeeds, I argue that there must be something problematic about the form of the analyses commonly offered. My general conclusion is that one cannot characterize delusions without taking away what it is distinctive about them."],"dc:format":["application/pdf","application/msword"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://knowledge.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/20733/1/20733%20Paresed%20Aline%20Final%20e-Thesis%20%28Master%20Copy%29.pdf","https://knowledge.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/20733/2/20733%20Paredes%20Aline%20e-Thesis%20Submission%20Form.doc"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:publisher.department":["School of Nursing"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Central Lancashire"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://knowledge.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/20733/"],"dc:subject":["Philosophy"],"dc:title":["The nature of delusion: An analysis of the contemporary philosophical debates"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["phd"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:36:16Z"}