{"id":{"repo_id":"carleton","oai_identifier":"oai:carleton.scholaris.ca:20.500.14718/43568"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/carleton/oai:carleton.scholaris.ca:20.500.14718/43568","repository":{"repo_id":"carleton","name":"Carleton University","base_url":"https://carleton.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Presumption of Non-Credibility","abstract":"Sexual violence is a rampant issue that affects millions of individuals around the world and especially women. This thesis will explore the work that the presumption of innocence, Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, does in the sexual assault trial in Canada. By discussing the juridogenic nature of Section 11(d) from an anti-carceral feminist perspective, and combined methods approach, I will demonstrate the both essential and vexatious nature of the presumption of innocence. Due-process procedures render a complainant untruthful by the natural effect of rendering an accused person honest, therefore, I argue that Section 11(d) creates and codifies a presumption of non-credibility on complainants. This reflects epistemic injustice and is especially problematic for survivors, because the issue becomes compounded by rape myths and testimonial injustice. The thesis engages in broader arguments around the call for justice beyond judicial convictions and community commitment to change.","abstract_html":"Sexual violence is a rampant issue that affects millions of individuals around the world and especially women. This thesis will explore the work that the presumption of innocence, Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, does in the sexual assault trial in Canada. By discussing the juridogenic nature of Section 11(d) from an anti-carceral feminist perspective, and combined methods approach, I will demonstrate the both essential and vexatious nature of the presumption of innocence. Due-process procedures render a complainant untruthful by the natural effect of rendering an accused person honest, therefore, I argue that Section 11(d) creates and codifies a presumption of non-credibility on complainants. This reflects epistemic injustice and is especially problematic for survivors, because the issue becomes compounded by rape myths and testimonial injustice. The thesis engages in broader arguments around the call for justice beyond judicial convictions and community commitment to change.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Nardi-Lamadeleine, Danica Sara"],"institution":"Carleton University","degree_name":"Master of Arts (M.A.)","degree_level":"Master's","degree_discipline":"Legal Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025","date_published":"2025","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:34:45Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright © 2024 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, distribution to students, research and scholarship. Theses may only be shared by linking to the Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be copied without proper attribution to the author; no part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.22215/etd/2025-16425"],"render_values":[{"text":"10.22215/etd/2025-16425","href":"https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2025-16425","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14718/43568","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Nardi-Lamadeleine, Danica Sara"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-05-23T20:04:09Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-05-23T20:04:09Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Carleton University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Legal Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master's"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (M.A.)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright © 2024 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, distribution to students, research and scholarship. Theses may only be shared by linking to the Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be copied without proper attribution to the author; no part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.22215/etd/2025-16425"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14718/43568"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Sexual violence is a rampant issue that affects millions of individuals around the world and especially women. This thesis will explore the work that the presumption of innocence, Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, does in the sexual assault trial in Canada. By discussing the juridogenic nature of Section 11(d) from an anti-carceral feminist perspective, and combined methods approach, I will demonstrate the both essential and vexatious nature of the presumption of innocence. Due-process procedures render a complainant untruthful by the natural effect of rendering an accused person honest, therefore, I argue that Section 11(d) creates and codifies a presumption of non-credibility on complainants. This reflects epistemic injustice and is especially problematic for survivors, because the issue becomes compounded by rape myths and testimonial injustice. The thesis engages in broader arguments around the call for justice beyond judicial convictions and community commitment to change."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Presumption of Non-Credibility"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Nardi-Lamadeleine, Danica Sara"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-05-23T20:04:09Z"],"dc:date.available":["2025-05-23T20:04:09Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2025"],"dc:description.abstract":["Sexual violence is a rampant issue that affects millions of individuals around the world and especially women. This thesis will explore the work that the presumption of innocence, Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, does in the sexual assault trial in Canada. By discussing the juridogenic nature of Section 11(d) from an anti-carceral feminist perspective, and combined methods approach, I will demonstrate the both essential and vexatious nature of the presumption of innocence. Due-process procedures render a complainant untruthful by the natural effect of rendering an accused person honest, therefore, I argue that Section 11(d) creates and codifies a presumption of non-credibility on complainants. This reflects epistemic injustice and is especially problematic for survivors, because the issue becomes compounded by rape myths and testimonial injustice. The thesis engages in broader arguments around the call for justice beyond judicial convictions and community commitment to change."],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.22215/etd/2025-16425"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14718/43568"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Carleton University"],"dc:rights":["Copyright © 2024 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, distribution to students, research and scholarship. Theses may only be shared by linking to the Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be copied without proper attribution to the author; no part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner."],"dc:title":["The Presumption of Non-Credibility"],"dc:type":["thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Legal Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master's"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (M.A.)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:34:45Z"}