{"id":{"repo_id":"carleton","oai_identifier":"oai:carleton.scholaris.ca:20.500.14718/32931"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/carleton/oai:carleton.scholaris.ca:20.500.14718/32931","repository":{"repo_id":"carleton","name":"Carleton University","base_url":"https://carleton.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Unplanned potential : domestic architecture designed for play","abstract":"Why do so many of us appear content to live in repeated rows of domestic homogeneity, particularly in suburbia? Have these recurrent domestic forms repressed our imagination? The house, as the primary place of human dwelling, is clearly one of the most influential architectural environments in our lives. Yet it has become more or less a unit of monetary exchange which, while satisfying the basic domestic functions, is designed primarily for profitability, resulting in obvious patterns of predictability. Might we consider the cultivation of play in the home environment to be one of the ways in which to dislocate this convention? Play will be analyzed in this thesis as a potential modus operandi of imaginative engagement with creative potentialities, rather than as a particular type of activity. The introduction of malleability, engagement and the selective deconstruction of boundaries within a domestic space are investigated as a means of designing for play. The thesis experiments with the efficacies of malleable boundaries directly manipulated by the inhabitants in transforming the house, allowing for constantly evolving alternative modes of dwelling.","abstract_html":"Why do so many of us appear content to live in repeated rows of domestic homogeneity, particularly in suburbia? Have these recurrent domestic forms repressed our imagination? The house, as the primary place of human dwelling, is clearly one of the most influential architectural environments in our lives. Yet it has become more or less a unit of monetary exchange which, while satisfying the basic domestic functions, is designed primarily for profitability, resulting in obvious patterns of predictability. Might we consider the cultivation of play in the home environment to be one of the ways in which to dislocate this convention? Play will be analyzed in this thesis as a potential modus operandi of imaginative engagement with creative potentialities, rather than as a particular type of activity. The introduction of malleability, engagement and the selective deconstruction of boundaries within a domestic space are investigated as a means of designing for play. The thesis experiments with the efficacies of malleable boundaries directly manipulated by the inhabitants in transforming the house, allowing for constantly evolving alternative modes of dwelling.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kearns, Yvonne Sylvia"],"institution":"Carleton University","degree_name":"Master of Architecture (M.Arch.)","degree_level":"Master's","degree_discipline":"Architecture","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012","date_published":"2012","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:34:32Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright © 2012 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, research, scholarship, and teaching. Theses may only be shared by linking to Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be used without proper attribution to the author. No part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.22215/etd/2012-07289"],"render_values":[{"text":"10.22215/etd/2012-07289","href":"https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2012-07289","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14718/32931","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kearns, Yvonne Sylvia"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-04-08T17:53:16Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-04-08T17:53:16Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2012"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Carleton University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Architecture"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master's"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Architecture (M.Arch.)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright © 2012 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, research, scholarship, and teaching. Theses may only be shared by linking to Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be used without proper attribution to the author. No part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.22215/etd/2012-07289"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14718/32931"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Why do so many of us appear content to live in repeated rows of domestic homogeneity, particularly in suburbia? Have these recurrent domestic forms repressed our imagination? The house, as the primary place of human dwelling, is clearly one of the most influential architectural environments in our lives. Yet it has become more or less a unit of monetary exchange which, while satisfying the basic domestic functions, is designed primarily for profitability, resulting in obvious patterns of predictability. Might we consider the cultivation of play in the home environment to be one of the ways in which to dislocate this convention? Play will be analyzed in this thesis as a potential modus operandi of imaginative engagement with creative potentialities, rather than as a particular type of activity. The introduction of malleability, engagement and the selective deconstruction of boundaries within a domestic space are investigated as a means of designing for play. The thesis experiments with the efficacies of malleable boundaries directly manipulated by the inhabitants in transforming the house, allowing for constantly evolving alternative modes of dwelling."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Unplanned potential : domestic architecture designed for play"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Kearns, Yvonne Sylvia"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-04-08T17:53:16Z"],"dc:date.available":["2025-04-08T17:53:16Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2012"],"dc:description.abstract":["Why do so many of us appear content to live in repeated rows of domestic homogeneity, particularly in suburbia? Have these recurrent domestic forms repressed our imagination? The house, as the primary place of human dwelling, is clearly one of the most influential architectural environments in our lives. Yet it has become more or less a unit of monetary exchange which, while satisfying the basic domestic functions, is designed primarily for profitability, resulting in obvious patterns of predictability. Might we consider the cultivation of play in the home environment to be one of the ways in which to dislocate this convention? Play will be analyzed in this thesis as a potential modus operandi of imaginative engagement with creative potentialities, rather than as a particular type of activity. The introduction of malleability, engagement and the selective deconstruction of boundaries within a domestic space are investigated as a means of designing for play. The thesis experiments with the efficacies of malleable boundaries directly manipulated by the inhabitants in transforming the house, allowing for constantly evolving alternative modes of dwelling."],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.22215/etd/2012-07289"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14718/32931"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Carleton University"],"dc:rights":["Copyright © 2012 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, research, scholarship, and teaching. Theses may only be shared by linking to Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be used without proper attribution to the author. No part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner."],"dc:title":["Unplanned potential : domestic architecture designed for play"],"dc:type":["thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Architecture"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master's"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Architecture (M.Arch.)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:34:32Z"}