{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9166"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9166","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Purpose and effect: 'the role of a taxpayer's intention in tax legislation","abstract":"This paper examines the role of a taxpayer’s intention in the way certain transactions will be taxed. The paper will examine the weight accorded to a taxpayer’s stated intention in different situations (i.e. in what situations/ transactions will a taxpayer’s intention have comparatively little weight when compared to the objective facts of the case?) The paper first ascertains the meaning of intention/purpose/motive in terms of the Income Tax Act, 58 of 1962 as amended, (hereafter referred to as “the Act”). The question is whether these words are synonymous or have separate and discrete meanings. The paper then looks at the typical areas of difficulty associated with a taxpayer’s intention. Share disposals are one example discussed, as it is often difficult to determine whether these disposals are of a capital or revenue nature. The weight accorded to a taxpayer’s intention in schemes involving tax avoidance is also discussed. Case law surrounding section 20A and section 80A-S80L of the Act are reviewed to ascertain how a taxpayer’s intention is dealt with in these sections","abstract_html":"This paper examines the role of a taxpayer’s intention in the way certain transactions will be taxed. The paper will examine the weight accorded to a taxpayer’s stated intention in different situations (i.e. in what situations/ transactions will a taxpayer’s intention have comparatively little weight when compared to the objective facts of the case?) The paper first ascertains the meaning of intention/purpose/motive in terms of the Income Tax Act, 58 of 1962 as amended, (hereafter referred to as “the Act”). The question is whether these words are synonymous or have separate and discrete meanings. The paper then looks at the typical areas of difficulty associated with a taxpayer’s intention. Share disposals are one example discussed, as it is often difficult to determine whether these disposals are of a capital or revenue nature. The weight accorded to a taxpayer’s intention in schemes involving tax avoidance is also discussed. Case law surrounding section 20A and section 80A-S80L of the Act are reviewed to ascertain how a taxpayer’s intention is dealt with in these sections","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kabot, Guy Terence"],"institution":"Department of Commercial Law","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014","date_published":"2014","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:21Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9166","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kabot, Guy Terence"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-11-05T03:53:59Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-11-05T03:53:59Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Commercial Law"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Postgraduate Diploma"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["PGDip"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9166"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Includes bibliographical references"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This paper examines the role of a taxpayer’s intention in the way certain transactions will be taxed. The paper will examine the weight accorded to a taxpayer’s stated intention in different situations (i.e. in what situations/ transactions will a taxpayer’s intention have comparatively little weight when compared to the objective facts of the case?) The paper first ascertains the meaning of intention/purpose/motive in terms of the Income Tax Act, 58 of 1962 as amended, (hereafter referred to as “the Act”). The question is whether these words are synonymous or have separate and discrete meanings. The paper then looks at the typical areas of difficulty associated with a taxpayer’s intention. Share disposals are one example discussed, as it is often difficult to determine whether these disposals are of a capital or revenue nature. The weight accorded to a taxpayer’s intention in schemes involving tax avoidance is also discussed. Case law surrounding section 20A and section 80A-S80L of the Act are reviewed to ascertain how a taxpayer’s intention is dealt with in these sections"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Purpose and effect: 'the role of a taxpayer's intention in tax legislation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Kabot, Guy Terence"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-11-05T03:53:59Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-11-05T03:53:59Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014"],"dc:description":["Includes bibliographical references"],"dc:description.abstract":["This paper examines the role of a taxpayer’s intention in the way certain transactions will be taxed. The paper will examine the weight accorded to a taxpayer’s stated intention in different situations (i.e. in what situations/ transactions will a taxpayer’s intention have comparatively little weight when compared to the objective facts of the case?) The paper first ascertains the meaning of intention/purpose/motive in terms of the Income Tax Act, 58 of 1962 as amended, (hereafter referred to as “the Act”). The question is whether these words are synonymous or have separate and discrete meanings. The paper then looks at the typical areas of difficulty associated with a taxpayer’s intention. Share disposals are one example discussed, as it is often difficult to determine whether these disposals are of a capital or revenue nature. The weight accorded to a taxpayer’s intention in schemes involving tax avoidance is also discussed. Case law surrounding section 20A and section 80A-S80L of the Act are reviewed to ascertain how a taxpayer’s intention is dealt with in these sections"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9166"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Commercial Law"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:title":["Purpose and effect: 'the role of a taxpayer's intention in tax legislation"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Postgraduate Diploma"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["PGDip"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:21Z"}