Back to results

Centre for Law and Society

Burden of proof: a historical and theoretical analysis of some aspects of the following concepts in relation to the interpretation of Section 82 of Act 58 of 1962: income, assessment, objection and appeal

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

A clear understanding of Section 82 of the Income Tax Act No 58 of 1962 [the Act] is of great practical consequence toothed tax consultant. Indeed, many a well chartered voyage: In the uncertain stormy ocean of taxation litigation has floundered on some deep hidden Jagged edge of the iceberg “burden of proof”. It is unfortunate that scant attention has been given to section 82 by our authorities. The latest edition of Meyerowitz [1991], "the bible of tax consultant" does not have "burden of proof" or "onus of proof" in its index. Section 1892 deals with onus of proof in 5 lines. It cites three cases the latest of which was decided in 1958.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Centre for Law and Society
Year dc:date.issued
1992

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Rubinsztein, Aron Natan

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42869
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42869

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Rubinsztein, Aron Natan. Burden of proof: a historical and theoretical analysis of some aspects of the following concepts in relation to the interpretation of Section 82 of Act 58 of 1962: income, assessment, objection and appeal. Centre for Law and Society, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42869