Back to results

Department of Public Law

Liability for negligent misstatement inducing a contract in South Africa and Germany

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The law in the area of negligent misrepresentation has undergone major changes during this century, in the legal systems of both South Africa and Germany. Which remedies does one have if financial loss is caused because another made a false statement'> The legal system in South Africa stands in the tradition of Roman, Roman-- Dutch and English law, while Germany derived its civil law from Roman principles. Neither of these historical legal backgrounds provided a complete answer to the question posed above, and if there were answers, they have been subjected to many changes and uncertainties due to the growing complexity of cases. The complexity is increased by the fact that misrepresentation overlaps both the law of contract as well as delict anthis challenges the distinction between the two of them. Through the development of given legal principles, it is now an established rule in South • African and German law that an action exists for the recovery of damages which were caused by negligent misrepresentation in the pre-contractual sphere.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Department of Public Law
Year dc:date.issued
1999

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • von Auer, Bettina Irene
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Huchtison, Dale

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42867
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42867

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

von Auer, Bettina Irene. Liability for negligent misstatement inducing a contract in South Africa and Germany. Department of Public Law, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42867