The Brummeria judgment: a comprehensive discourse on this case and its application to interest free loans granted to trusts

In September 2007, the world of South African tax planning received an unexpected judgment in the income tax case of the Commissioner for South African Revenue Service v Brummeria Renaissance (Phj) Ltd and others2. The reason why the decision in this case caused much controversy was because it ran counter to the long-held belief that interest-free loans are not taxable in the hands of the borrower. Rather, it may now be possible for the Commissioner for South African Revenue Services to impute a notional income on the borrower. This paper seeks to examine whether or not this is appropriate and in which circumstances this is applicable. The raison d'etre why the judgment was unexpected was due to the fact that taxing notional income is contrary to what was held by Feetham JA in the Butcher Brothers case3 where in the context of lease premiums, the consideration had to have an "ascertainable money value, and not merely a conjectural value". There has been much debate and concern from a wide range of persons some of which include tax specialists, trustees and donors. The main cause for concern is the question of how this judgment will be applied in futuro and how far-reaching its effects will be. This judgment has caused some concern in the South African tax circles, with several persons and entities considering changing the terms of their interest-free loans in order to incorporate an interest element.

Grantor dc:publisher.institution

Department of Commercial Law

Year dc:date.issued

2010

Author dc:creator

• Beattie, Lisa Claire

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Davis, Dennis

• the Brummeria judgment
• South African Revenue Service

Language dc:language.iso

en

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42842

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42842