{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42057"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42057","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The nautical fault defence- an anachronism or a concept of the future?","abstract":"In context of the carriage of goods by sea, the carrier's liability for loss of or damage to the goods has always been a controversial topic, because the carrier's and the shipper's interests have to be harmonised. In order to find an equitable solution, several liability regimes have been developed and a catalogue of immunities has been established which exempted the carrier from his liability. One of these exonerations is the 'nautical fault' defence of the carrier. This defence exonerates the carrier from liability for loss or damage arising or resulting from act, neglect or default of the master, mariner, pilot, or the servants of the carrier in the navigation or in the management of the ship.","abstract_html":"In context of the carriage of goods by sea, the carrier's liability for loss of or damage to the goods has always been a controversial topic, because the carrier's and the shipper's interests have to be harmonised. In order to find an equitable solution, several liability regimes have been developed and a catalogue of immunities has been established which exempted the carrier from his liability. One of these exonerations is the 'nautical fault' defence of the carrier. This defence exonerates the carrier from liability for loss or damage arising or resulting from act, neglect or default of the master, mariner, pilot, or the servants of the carrier in the navigation or in the management of the ship.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Maelicke, Steffen"],"institution":"Shipping Law Unit","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Hare, John"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2000,"date_issued":"2000","date_published":"2000","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:26Z","subjects":["Nautical fault"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42057","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Hare, John"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Maelicke, Steffen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-10-29T06:29:39Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-10-29T06:29:39Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2000"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Shipping Law Unit"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis / Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters","LLM"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Nautical fault"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42057"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In context of the carriage of goods by sea, the carrier's liability for loss of or damage to the goods has always been a controversial topic, because the carrier's and the shipper's interests have to be harmonised. In order to find an equitable solution, several liability regimes have been developed and a catalogue of immunities has been established which exempted the carrier from his liability. One of these exonerations is the 'nautical fault' defence of the carrier. This defence exonerates the carrier from liability for loss or damage arising or resulting from act, neglect or default of the master, mariner, pilot, or the servants of the carrier in the navigation or in the management of the ship."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The nautical fault defence- an anachronism or a concept of the future?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Hare, John"],"dc:creator":["Maelicke, Steffen"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-10-29T06:29:39Z"],"dc:date.available":["2025-10-29T06:29:39Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2000"],"dc:description.abstract":["In context of the carriage of goods by sea, the carrier's liability for loss of or damage to the goods has always been a controversial topic, because the carrier's and the shipper's interests have to be harmonised. In order to find an equitable solution, several liability regimes have been developed and a catalogue of immunities has been established which exempted the carrier from his liability. One of these exonerations is the 'nautical fault' defence of the carrier. This defence exonerates the carrier from liability for loss or damage arising or resulting from act, neglect or default of the master, mariner, pilot, or the servants of the carrier in the navigation or in the management of the ship."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42057"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher.department":["Shipping Law Unit"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:subject":["Nautical fault"],"dc:title":["The nautical fault defence- an anachronism or a concept of the future?"],"dc:type":["Thesis / Dissertation"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters","LLM"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:26Z"}