Back to results

College of Accounting

Implications of the distinct or interchangeable use of the terms “ESG” and “sustainability” on reporting by global banks in the context of COVID-19

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The use of the buzzwords “ESG” and “sustainability” has been on the rise. Although used interchangeably, the terms “ESG” and “sustainability” have different meanings. This study explored the differences and similarities between the ESG disclosures and sustainability disclosures of banks, including whether there is an acknowledgement of the difference between the terms “ESG” and “sustainability” in 2019 and 2021 and the implications regarding reporting practices. The integrated reports and sustainability reports analysed are for a sample of 25 banks, as banks have a dual responsibility in terms of ESG and sustainability reporting. The sampled banks are from South Africa, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States and France - where integrated reporting and sustainability reporting exist. An interpretative content analysis was performed on the reports, with results being recorded in a template. The implication of the distinction or non-distinction was further investigated in terms of the number of reports used to report on the matters, the purpose of the report, the target audience for each report, what constitutes the definition of materiality in the context of each report and whether Covid-19 contributed towards a change in the materiality constitution of those reports between 2019 and 2021. The results show that banks do not distinguish between “ESG” and “sustainability”. Further, the findings suggest that the non-distinction between the two terms by authoritative guidance, frameworks and standards mandatorily adopted results in no separation between the forms of reporting used to report on ESG matters and sustainability matters. As a result, more than one report is used to report on ESG matters and sustainability matters. However, the ESG matters and sustainability matters are disclosed together, leading to the purpose, target audience and materiality definitions being the same for both ESG matters and sustainability matters. Covid-19 is not listed as a critical contributor to determining material matters in 2021 as opposed to 2019.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
College of Accounting
Year dc:date.issued
2025

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Masemola, Mokganye Mathabo
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Herbert, Shelly

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41714
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41714

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Masemola, Mokganye Mathabo. Implications of the distinct or interchangeable use of the terms “ESG” and “sustainability” on reporting by global banks in the context of COVID-19. College of Accounting, 2025. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41714