Back to results

Centre for Law and Society

Review and reform of South African health legislation

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The 27 April 1994 saw the dawning of a new era in which all South Africans became entitled to a common South African citizenship in a sovereign and democratic state. Political transition brought with it the promise of a better life for all citizens of South Africa as apartheid policies and racist legislation were relegated to the annals of history, and as the process of reconstructing a society torn by discrimination, prejudice and inter-racial strife commenced. The South African health care system was not immune to the destructive policies of the past, and has developed in a fragmented and often poorly co-ordinated manner. This has adversely affected the equitability, affordability, accessibility, effectiveness, efficiency and appropriateness of the South African health care system. The new South African government has identified the improvement of health care as a fundamental component of its Reconstruction and Development Programme. In July 1995, the government also unveiled plans to implement a National Health Insurance System, in terms of which all permanent residents of South Africa would be guaranteed access, on equal terms, to all services provided by a publicly funded Primary Health Care System.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor
Centre for Law and Society
Year dc:date.issued
1995

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Harrison, Stephen Geoffrey Davidson
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Corder, Hugh

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40617
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40617

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Harrison, Stephen Geoffrey Davidson. Review and reform of South African health legislation. Centre for Law and Society, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40617