{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38805"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38805","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Pure economic loss from a comparative perspective","abstract":"English law originally did not provide an action in cases where pure economic loss was caused negligently. From the Middle Ages (i.e. from more or less the 13th century), when there arose a remedy called 'trespass', which was applicable only in cases of direct forcible injury,","abstract_html":"English law originally did not provide an action in cases where pure economic loss was caused negligently. From the Middle Ages (i.e. from more or less the 13th century), when there arose a remedy called 'trespass', which was applicable only in cases of direct forcible injury,","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Von Frentz,WFR"],"institution":"Centre for Law and Society","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Visser, Daniel"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1994,"date_issued":"1994","date_published":"1994","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:17Z","subjects":["Pure Economic Loss"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38805","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Visser, Daniel"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Von Frentz,WFR"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2023-09-21T08:08:07Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-09-21T08:08:07Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1994"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Centre for Law and Society"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters","LLM"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Pure Economic Loss"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38805"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["English law originally did not provide an action in cases where pure economic loss was caused negligently. From the Middle Ages (i.e. from more or less the 13th century), when there arose a remedy called 'trespass', which was applicable only in cases of direct forcible injury,"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Pure economic loss from a comparative perspective"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Visser, Daniel"],"dc:creator":["Von Frentz,WFR"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2023-09-21T08:08:07Z"],"dc:date.available":["2023-09-21T08:08:07Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1994"],"dc:description.abstract":["English law originally did not provide an action in cases where pure economic loss was caused negligently. From the Middle Ages (i.e. from more or less the 13th century), when there arose a remedy called 'trespass', which was applicable only in cases of direct forcible injury,"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38805"],"dc:publisher.department":["Centre for Law and Society"],"dc:subject":["Pure Economic Loss"],"dc:title":["Pure economic loss from a comparative perspective"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters","LLM"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:17Z"}