The right to not be refused emergency medical treatment in South Africa

Emergency medical treatment is not expressly recognised as a right under international law, but it is implied under the right to the highest attainable standard of health as set out in article 12 of the ICESCR. Some states, including South Africa, have recognised emergency medical treatment as a right in its own respect. In South Africa, Section 27(3) of the Constitution provides that nobody may be refused emergency medical treatment. This thesis shows that while this is a constitutionally entrenched right and there is a legislative framework in South Africa giving effect to this right, there are gaps in the law that affect the effective implementation of this right. The concept of emergency medical treatment, or a medical emergency, remains ill-defined in South African legislation. The implications of this right for both state and private healthcare providers remain underdeveloped. The interests of the most vulnerable members of society are not adequately protected in legislation governing emergency medical treatment. Lastly, many people in South Africa do not have access to emergency medical treatment.

Grantor

Department of Public Law

Year dc:date.issued

2022

Author dc:creator

• Dickson, Roxanne

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Chirwa, Danwood

• Emergency medical treatment
• right to health, Section 27(3) of the Constitution

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37112

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37112