{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/35466"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/35466","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995","abstract":"The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice.","abstract_html":"The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Marinus, Grant Brett"],"institution":"Institute of Development and Labour Law","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Thompson, Clive"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1996,"date_issued":"1996","date_published":"1996","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:54Z","subjects":["Collective bargaining"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Thompson, Clive"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Marinus, Grant Brett"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2021-12-14T09:53:44Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-12-14T09:53:44Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1996"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Institute of Development and Labour Law"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters","LLM"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Collective bargaining"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Thompson, Clive"],"dc:creator":["Marinus, Grant Brett"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2021-12-14T09:53:44Z"],"dc:date.available":["2021-12-14T09:53:44Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1996"],"dc:description.abstract":["The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466"],"dc:publisher.department":["Institute of Development and Labour Law"],"dc:subject":["Collective bargaining"],"dc:title":["A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters","LLM"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:54Z"}