{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32725"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32725","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"BEPS action 14 – the effectiveness of the dispute resolution proposals, with specific reference to South Africa","abstract":"The focus of this minor dissertation is on the dispute resolution methods proposed by Action 14 of the Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project. The BEPS Project' was introduced in 2013 by the OECD working together with the G20 and other states to reform the international tax framework. The reform was necessary to deal with the challenges posed by globalisation. The existing international tax framework had not changed for many years and was unable to deal with these new challenges. As stated by the OECD in its Explanatory Statement in 2013, there was a need to build an international tax system to support economic growth and a resilient global economy. The report highlighted that the loss to international corporate income tax caused by these challenges was between 4% and l 0% of global corporate income revenues. As part of the proposed reforms, the report highlighted the need for new measures to address the problem of BEPS as well as provide a structure to support these newly introduced measures. Improving the international dispute resolution mechanisms was identified as an essential structural reform to support the new BEPS measures, as it was anticipated these measures would give rise to more inter-State disputes.","abstract_html":"The focus of this minor dissertation is on the dispute resolution methods proposed by Action 14 of the Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project. The BEPS Project' was introduced in 2013 by the OECD working together with the G20 and other states to reform the international tax framework. The reform was necessary to deal with the challenges posed by globalisation. The existing international tax framework had not changed for many years and was unable to deal with these new challenges. As stated by the OECD in its Explanatory Statement in 2013, there was a need to build an international tax system to support economic growth and a resilient global economy. The report highlighted that the loss to international corporate income tax caused by these challenges was between 4% and l 0% of global corporate income revenues. As part of the proposed reforms, the report highlighted the need for new measures to address the problem of BEPS as well as provide a structure to support these newly introduced measures. Improving the international dispute resolution mechanisms was identified as an essential structural reform to support the new BEPS measures, as it was anticipated these measures would give rise to more inter-State disputes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lalor, Diane Susan"],"institution":"Department of Commercial Law","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Hattingh, Johann"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020","date_published":"2020","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:35Z","subjects":["commercial law"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32725","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Hattingh, Johann"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lalor, Diane Susan"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2021-01-28T11:48:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-01-28T11:48:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2020"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Commercial Law"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters","LLM"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["commercial law"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32725"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The focus of this minor dissertation is on the dispute resolution methods proposed by Action 14 of the Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project. The BEPS Project' was introduced in 2013 by the OECD working together with the G20 and other states to reform the international tax framework. The reform was necessary to deal with the challenges posed by globalisation. The existing international tax framework had not changed for many years and was unable to deal with these new challenges. As stated by the OECD in its Explanatory Statement in 2013, there was a need to build an international tax system to support economic growth and a resilient global economy. The report highlighted that the loss to international corporate income tax caused by these challenges was between 4% and l 0% of global corporate income revenues. As part of the proposed reforms, the report highlighted the need for new measures to address the problem of BEPS as well as provide a structure to support these newly introduced measures. Improving the international dispute resolution mechanisms was identified as an essential structural reform to support the new BEPS measures, as it was anticipated these measures would give rise to more inter-State disputes."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["BEPS action 14 – the effectiveness of the dispute resolution proposals, with specific reference to South Africa"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Hattingh, Johann"],"dc:creator":["Lalor, Diane Susan"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2021-01-28T11:48:35Z"],"dc:date.available":["2021-01-28T11:48:35Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2020"],"dc:description.abstract":["The focus of this minor dissertation is on the dispute resolution methods proposed by Action 14 of the Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project. The BEPS Project' was introduced in 2013 by the OECD working together with the G20 and other states to reform the international tax framework. The reform was necessary to deal with the challenges posed by globalisation. The existing international tax framework had not changed for many years and was unable to deal with these new challenges. As stated by the OECD in its Explanatory Statement in 2013, there was a need to build an international tax system to support economic growth and a resilient global economy. The report highlighted that the loss to international corporate income tax caused by these challenges was between 4% and l 0% of global corporate income revenues. As part of the proposed reforms, the report highlighted the need for new measures to address the problem of BEPS as well as provide a structure to support these newly introduced measures. Improving the international dispute resolution mechanisms was identified as an essential structural reform to support the new BEPS measures, as it was anticipated these measures would give rise to more inter-State disputes."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32725"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Commercial Law"],"dc:subject":["commercial law"],"dc:title":["BEPS action 14 – the effectiveness of the dispute resolution proposals, with specific reference to South Africa"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters","LLM"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:35Z"}