{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31810"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31810","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"DNA barcoding of forensically important blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) within the Western Cape of South Africa","abstract":"In forensic entomology, determining species identity is a crucial step towards estimating post mortem interval. DNA barcoding can aid in the identification of unknown forensically relevant species, and this requires the comparison of DNA barcodes to reference data from known species. However, there is a lack of DNA barcode reference data of forensically relevant Calliphoridae species in the Western Cape (South Africa). DNA barcodes were generated for the COI and ITS2 markers for 41 forensically relevant Calliphoridae specimens, representing seven species from six localities in the Western Cape: Chrysomya albiceps (n = 3), Chrysomya chloropyga (n = 8), Chrysomya marginalis (n = 5), Chrysomya megacephala (n = 7), Hemipyrellia fernandica (n = 1), Lucilia cuprina (n = 8) and Lucilia sericata (n = 9). This data was combined with that from Cooke et al. (2018) (n = 40), and subjected to rigorous statistical and phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic analysis which combined data for both COI and ITS2 barcodes returned monophyletic clades for each species with increased support when compared to using each barcode individually. This combined dataset was able to discriminate between L. cuprina and L. sericata with full support (100% pP), which was not achieved previously. DNA barcodes were evaluated for intra- and inter-specific variance as well as haplotype patterning. No haplotype patterning was observed for either barcodes across sampled localities. Lastly, a single-blinded approach was used to assess the dataset, whereby DNA barcodes from ‘unknown’ specimens were correctly identified using this reference data. These identifications were more accurate than those using GenBank® or BOLD, highlighting the importance of using locally relevant reference data. This study has contributed new data pertaining to DNA barcodes for seven Calliphoridae species, which was previously scarce for the Western Cape, and this has directly contributed to an improvement in the accuracy of local species identification.","abstract_html":"In forensic entomology, determining species identity is a crucial step towards estimating post mortem interval. DNA barcoding can aid in the identification of unknown forensically relevant species, and this requires the comparison of DNA barcodes to reference data from known species. However, there is a lack of DNA barcode reference data of forensically relevant Calliphoridae species in the Western Cape (South Africa). DNA barcodes were generated for the COI and ITS2 markers for 41 forensically relevant Calliphoridae specimens, representing seven species from six localities in the Western Cape: Chrysomya albiceps (n = 3), Chrysomya chloropyga (n = 8), Chrysomya marginalis (n = 5), Chrysomya megacephala (n = 7), Hemipyrellia fernandica (n = 1), Lucilia cuprina (n = 8) and Lucilia sericata (n = 9). This data was combined with that from Cooke et al. (2018) (n = 40), and subjected to rigorous statistical and phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic analysis which combined data for both COI and ITS2 barcodes returned monophyletic clades for each species with increased support when compared to using each barcode individually. This combined dataset was able to discriminate between L. cuprina and L. sericata with full support (100% pP), which was not achieved previously. DNA barcodes were evaluated for intra- and inter-specific variance as well as haplotype patterning. No haplotype patterning was observed for either barcodes across sampled localities. Lastly, a single-blinded approach was used to assess the dataset, whereby DNA barcodes from ‘unknown’ specimens were correctly identified using this reference data. These identifications were more accurate than those using GenBank® or BOLD, highlighting the importance of using locally relevant reference data. This study has contributed new data pertaining to DNA barcodes for seven Calliphoridae species, which was previously scarce for the Western Cape, and this has directly contributed to an improvement in the accuracy of local species identification.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kulenkampff, Kyle Sieghard"],"institution":"Department of Pathology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Heathfield, Laura","Heyns, Marise"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019","date_published":"2019","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:27Z","subjects":["Biomedical Forensic Science"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/11427/31810","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Heathfield, Laura","Heyns, Marise"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kulenkampff, Kyle Sieghard"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-05-06T12:05:01Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-05-06T12:05:01Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Pathology"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["MPhil"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Biomedical Forensic Science"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/11427/31810"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In forensic entomology, determining species identity is a crucial step towards estimating post mortem interval. DNA barcoding can aid in the identification of unknown forensically relevant species, and this requires the comparison of DNA barcodes to reference data from known species. However, there is a lack of DNA barcode reference data of forensically relevant Calliphoridae species in the Western Cape (South Africa). DNA barcodes were generated for the COI and ITS2 markers for 41 forensically relevant Calliphoridae specimens, representing seven species from six localities in the Western Cape: Chrysomya albiceps (n = 3), Chrysomya chloropyga (n = 8), Chrysomya marginalis (n = 5), Chrysomya megacephala (n = 7), Hemipyrellia fernandica (n = 1), Lucilia cuprina (n = 8) and Lucilia sericata (n = 9). This data was combined with that from Cooke et al. (2018) (n = 40), and subjected to rigorous statistical and phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic analysis which combined data for both COI and ITS2 barcodes returned monophyletic clades for each species with increased support when compared to using each barcode individually. This combined dataset was able to discriminate between L. cuprina and L. sericata with full support (100% pP), which was not achieved previously. DNA barcodes were evaluated for intra- and inter-specific variance as well as haplotype patterning. No haplotype patterning was observed for either barcodes across sampled localities. Lastly, a single-blinded approach was used to assess the dataset, whereby DNA barcodes from ‘unknown’ specimens were correctly identified using this reference data. These identifications were more accurate than those using GenBank® or BOLD, highlighting the importance of using locally relevant reference data. This study has contributed new data pertaining to DNA barcodes for seven Calliphoridae species, which was previously scarce for the Western Cape, and this has directly contributed to an improvement in the accuracy of local species identification."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["DNA barcoding of forensically important blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) within the Western Cape of South Africa"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Heathfield, Laura","Heyns, Marise"],"dc:creator":["Kulenkampff, Kyle Sieghard"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-05-06T12:05:01Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-05-06T12:05:01Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2019"],"dc:description.abstract":["In forensic entomology, determining species identity is a crucial step towards estimating post mortem interval. DNA barcoding can aid in the identification of unknown forensically relevant species, and this requires the comparison of DNA barcodes to reference data from known species. However, there is a lack of DNA barcode reference data of forensically relevant Calliphoridae species in the Western Cape (South Africa). DNA barcodes were generated for the COI and ITS2 markers for 41 forensically relevant Calliphoridae specimens, representing seven species from six localities in the Western Cape: Chrysomya albiceps (n = 3), Chrysomya chloropyga (n = 8), Chrysomya marginalis (n = 5), Chrysomya megacephala (n = 7), Hemipyrellia fernandica (n = 1), Lucilia cuprina (n = 8) and Lucilia sericata (n = 9). This data was combined with that from Cooke et al. (2018) (n = 40), and subjected to rigorous statistical and phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic analysis which combined data for both COI and ITS2 barcodes returned monophyletic clades for each species with increased support when compared to using each barcode individually. This combined dataset was able to discriminate between L. cuprina and L. sericata with full support (100% pP), which was not achieved previously. DNA barcodes were evaluated for intra- and inter-specific variance as well as haplotype patterning. No haplotype patterning was observed for either barcodes across sampled localities. Lastly, a single-blinded approach was used to assess the dataset, whereby DNA barcodes from ‘unknown’ specimens were correctly identified using this reference data. These identifications were more accurate than those using GenBank® or BOLD, highlighting the importance of using locally relevant reference data. This study has contributed new data pertaining to DNA barcodes for seven Calliphoridae species, which was previously scarce for the Western Cape, and this has directly contributed to an improvement in the accuracy of local species identification."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/11427/31810"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Pathology"],"dc:subject":["Biomedical Forensic Science"],"dc:title":["DNA barcoding of forensically important blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) within the Western Cape of South Africa"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["MPhil"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:27Z"}