{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/28152"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/28152","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Evaluating the importance of root abscission versus efflux to plant N-loss: consequences for plant N-isotope composition","abstract":"The common observation that plant δ¹⁵N values are lower than those of associated soil is generally attributed to transporter-facilitated efflux of ¹⁵N-enriched N. N efflux tends to occur under specific conditions, for instance, when the external N concentration is high, when the external medium is acidic and when roots experience mechanical stress. While efflux is presumed to act as a regulator of cytoplasmic N concentrations, it is energetically costly for plants to take up N only to release it back into the rhizosphere. A link between root tissue loss (e.g. root turnover or rhizodeposition) and plant δ¹⁵N has not been suggested, although root abscission is likely to be more ubiquitous than N efflux. This thesis questions the extent to which N efflux and root abscission contribute to plant N-loss and plant δ¹⁵N values. I hypothesized that: (1) plants supplied with more N would have more negative δ¹⁵N relative to the source, and greater root abscission from a relatively larger root biomass (2) the aeration necessary for hydroponic culture can act as a mechanical stressor on roots, accentuating plant N-loss through root abscission and N efflux. Wheat was grown in sand with NO₃- supplied at five relative addition rates (RAR) and in hydroponics with three physical disturbance regimes (direct aeration, aeration constrained within a pipe and circulation of nutrient solution through sand). The δ¹⁵N of roots and shoots, as well as the plant-derived N accumulation in both growth mediums, were determined. When the N supply matched the plant N demand, as determined by the relative growth rate, there was no discrimination between plant and source δ¹⁵N. N-loss here, although negligible, was in the organic form, which implies root abscission. By contrast, when N supply exceeded plant N demand, plant δ¹⁵N values decreased (e.g. after 47 d, plant δ¹⁵N of RAR 0.075 d⁻¹ was 0.4‰ but was −4.1‰ at RAR 0.175 d⁻¹) because they lost ¹⁵N-enriched N. This N was largely inorganic and presumably lost through efflux. In disturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. direct and pipe treatments), root 'fragments' were a major biomass- (six-fold greater than root dry weight) and N-loss (two-fold greater than plant net N uptake) pathway. Plants from all treatments lost more N within root fragments than through efflux, although the cumulative N-loss was significantly smaller from plants grown in relatively undisturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. sand). This suggests that root abscission is likely to be an important N-loss pathway for plants and thus contributes to the global offset between plant and soil δ¹⁵N values. Moreover, efforts to improve nitrogen use efficiency of crop plants, though reduced efflux, need to take cognizance of root abscission because it is an unavoidable artefact of root growth.","abstract_html":"The common observation that plant δ¹⁵N values are lower than those of associated soil is generally attributed to transporter-facilitated efflux of ¹⁵N-enriched N. N efflux tends to occur under specific conditions, for instance, when the external N concentration is high, when the external medium is acidic and when roots experience mechanical stress. While efflux is presumed to act as a regulator of cytoplasmic N concentrations, it is energetically costly for plants to take up N only to release it back into the rhizosphere. A link between root tissue loss (e.g. root turnover or rhizodeposition) and plant δ¹⁵N has not been suggested, although root abscission is likely to be more ubiquitous than N efflux. This thesis questions the extent to which N efflux and root abscission contribute to plant N-loss and plant δ¹⁵N values. I hypothesized that: (1) plants supplied with more N would have more negative δ¹⁵N relative to the source, and greater root abscission from a relatively larger root biomass (2) the aeration necessary for hydroponic culture can act as a mechanical stressor on roots, accentuating plant N-loss through root abscission and N efflux. Wheat was grown in sand with NO₃- supplied at five relative addition rates (RAR) and in hydroponics with three physical disturbance regimes (direct aeration, aeration constrained within a pipe and circulation of nutrient solution through sand). The δ¹⁵N of roots and shoots, as well as the plant-derived N accumulation in both growth mediums, were determined. When the N supply matched the plant N demand, as determined by the relative growth rate, there was no discrimination between plant and source δ¹⁵N. N-loss here, although negligible, was in the organic form, which implies root abscission. By contrast, when N supply exceeded plant N demand, plant δ¹⁵N values decreased (e.g. after 47 d, plant δ¹⁵N of RAR 0.075 d⁻¹ was 0.4‰ but was −4.1‰ at RAR 0.175 d⁻¹) because they lost ¹⁵N-enriched N. This N was largely inorganic and presumably lost through efflux. In disturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. direct and pipe treatments), root 'fragments' were a major biomass- (six-fold greater than root dry weight) and N-loss (two-fold greater than plant net N uptake) pathway. Plants from all treatments lost more N within root fragments than through efflux, although the cumulative N-loss was significantly smaller from plants grown in relatively undisturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. sand). This suggests that root abscission is likely to be an important N-loss pathway for plants and thus contributes to the global offset between plant and soil δ¹⁵N values. Moreover, efforts to improve nitrogen use efficiency of crop plants, though reduced efflux, need to take cognizance of root abscission because it is an unavoidable artefact of root growth.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Packer, Kirsten F"],"institution":"Department of Biological Sciences","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Cramer, Michael D"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018","date_published":"2018","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:18Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28152","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Cramer, Michael D"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Packer, Kirsten F"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2018-05-25T07:49:17Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-05-25T07:49:17Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2018"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Biological Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["MSc"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28152"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The common observation that plant δ¹⁵N values are lower than those of associated soil is generally attributed to transporter-facilitated efflux of ¹⁵N-enriched N. N efflux tends to occur under specific conditions, for instance, when the external N concentration is high, when the external medium is acidic and when roots experience mechanical stress. While efflux is presumed to act as a regulator of cytoplasmic N concentrations, it is energetically costly for plants to take up N only to release it back into the rhizosphere. A link between root tissue loss (e.g. root turnover or rhizodeposition) and plant δ¹⁵N has not been suggested, although root abscission is likely to be more ubiquitous than N efflux. This thesis questions the extent to which N efflux and root abscission contribute to plant N-loss and plant δ¹⁵N values. I hypothesized that: (1) plants supplied with more N would have more negative δ¹⁵N relative to the source, and greater root abscission from a relatively larger root biomass (2) the aeration necessary for hydroponic culture can act as a mechanical stressor on roots, accentuating plant N-loss through root abscission and N efflux. Wheat was grown in sand with NO₃- supplied at five relative addition rates (RAR) and in hydroponics with three physical disturbance regimes (direct aeration, aeration constrained within a pipe and circulation of nutrient solution through sand). The δ¹⁵N of roots and shoots, as well as the plant-derived N accumulation in both growth mediums, were determined. When the N supply matched the plant N demand, as determined by the relative growth rate, there was no discrimination between plant and source δ¹⁵N. N-loss here, although negligible, was in the organic form, which implies root abscission. By contrast, when N supply exceeded plant N demand, plant δ¹⁵N values decreased (e.g. after 47 d, plant δ¹⁵N of RAR 0.075 d⁻¹ was 0.4‰ but was −4.1‰ at RAR 0.175 d⁻¹) because they lost ¹⁵N-enriched N. This N was largely inorganic and presumably lost through efflux. In disturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. direct and pipe treatments), root 'fragments' were a major biomass- (six-fold greater than root dry weight) and N-loss (two-fold greater than plant net N uptake) pathway. Plants from all treatments lost more N within root fragments than through efflux, although the cumulative N-loss was significantly smaller from plants grown in relatively undisturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. sand). This suggests that root abscission is likely to be an important N-loss pathway for plants and thus contributes to the global offset between plant and soil δ¹⁵N values. Moreover, efforts to improve nitrogen use efficiency of crop plants, though reduced efflux, need to take cognizance of root abscission because it is an unavoidable artefact of root growth."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Evaluating the importance of root abscission versus efflux to plant N-loss: consequences for plant N-isotope composition"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Cramer, Michael D"],"dc:creator":["Packer, Kirsten F"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2018-05-25T07:49:17Z"],"dc:date.available":["2018-05-25T07:49:17Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2018"],"dc:description.abstract":["The common observation that plant δ¹⁵N values are lower than those of associated soil is generally attributed to transporter-facilitated efflux of ¹⁵N-enriched N. N efflux tends to occur under specific conditions, for instance, when the external N concentration is high, when the external medium is acidic and when roots experience mechanical stress. While efflux is presumed to act as a regulator of cytoplasmic N concentrations, it is energetically costly for plants to take up N only to release it back into the rhizosphere. A link between root tissue loss (e.g. root turnover or rhizodeposition) and plant δ¹⁵N has not been suggested, although root abscission is likely to be more ubiquitous than N efflux. This thesis questions the extent to which N efflux and root abscission contribute to plant N-loss and plant δ¹⁵N values. I hypothesized that: (1) plants supplied with more N would have more negative δ¹⁵N relative to the source, and greater root abscission from a relatively larger root biomass (2) the aeration necessary for hydroponic culture can act as a mechanical stressor on roots, accentuating plant N-loss through root abscission and N efflux. Wheat was grown in sand with NO₃- supplied at five relative addition rates (RAR) and in hydroponics with three physical disturbance regimes (direct aeration, aeration constrained within a pipe and circulation of nutrient solution through sand). The δ¹⁵N of roots and shoots, as well as the plant-derived N accumulation in both growth mediums, were determined. When the N supply matched the plant N demand, as determined by the relative growth rate, there was no discrimination between plant and source δ¹⁵N. N-loss here, although negligible, was in the organic form, which implies root abscission. By contrast, when N supply exceeded plant N demand, plant δ¹⁵N values decreased (e.g. after 47 d, plant δ¹⁵N of RAR 0.075 d⁻¹ was 0.4‰ but was −4.1‰ at RAR 0.175 d⁻¹) because they lost ¹⁵N-enriched N. This N was largely inorganic and presumably lost through efflux. In disturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. direct and pipe treatments), root 'fragments' were a major biomass- (six-fold greater than root dry weight) and N-loss (two-fold greater than plant net N uptake) pathway. Plants from all treatments lost more N within root fragments than through efflux, although the cumulative N-loss was significantly smaller from plants grown in relatively undisturbed hydroponic conditions (i.e. sand). This suggests that root abscission is likely to be an important N-loss pathway for plants and thus contributes to the global offset between plant and soil δ¹⁵N values. Moreover, efforts to improve nitrogen use efficiency of crop plants, though reduced efflux, need to take cognizance of root abscission because it is an unavoidable artefact of root growth."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28152"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Biological Sciences"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:title":["Evaluating the importance of root abscission versus efflux to plant N-loss: consequences for plant N-isotope composition"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["MSc"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:18Z"}