{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/25651"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/25651","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Identifying predictors of evolutionary dispersion with phylogeographic generalised linear models","abstract":"Discrete phylogeographic models enable the inference of the geographic history of biological organisms along phylogenetic trees. Frequently applied in the context of epidemiological modelling, phylogeographic generalised linear models were developed to allow for the evaluation of multiple predictors of spatial diffusion. The standard phylogeographic generalised linear model formulation, however, assumes that rates of spatial diffusion are a noiseless deterministic function of the set of covariates, admitting no other unobserved sources of variation. Under a variety of simulation scenarios, we demonstrate that the lack of a term modelling stochastic noise results in high false positive rates for predictors of spatial diffusion. We further show that the false positive rate can be controlled by including a random effect term, thus allowing unobserved sources of rate variation. Finally, we apply this random effects model to three recently published datasets and contrast the results of analysing these datasets with those obtained using the standard model. Our study demonstrates the prevalence of false positive results for predictors under the standard phylogeographic model in multiple simulation scenarios and, using empirical data from the literature, highlights the importance of a model accounting for random variation.","abstract_html":"Discrete phylogeographic models enable the inference of the geographic history of biological organisms along phylogenetic trees. Frequently applied in the context of epidemiological modelling, phylogeographic generalised linear models were developed to allow for the evaluation of multiple predictors of spatial diffusion. The standard phylogeographic generalised linear model formulation, however, assumes that rates of spatial diffusion are a noiseless deterministic function of the set of covariates, admitting no other unobserved sources of variation. Under a variety of simulation scenarios, we demonstrate that the lack of a term modelling stochastic noise results in high false positive rates for predictors of spatial diffusion. We further show that the false positive rate can be controlled by including a random effect term, thus allowing unobserved sources of rate variation. Finally, we apply this random effects model to three recently published datasets and contrast the results of analysing these datasets with those obtained using the standard model. Our study demonstrates the prevalence of false positive results for predictors under the standard phylogeographic model in multiple simulation scenarios and, using empirical data from the literature, highlights the importance of a model accounting for random variation.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wolff-Piggott, Timothy"],"institution":"Department of Statistical Sciences","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Lacerda, Miguel","Murrell, Ben"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017","date_published":"2017","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:41Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25651","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Lacerda, Miguel","Murrell, Ben"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wolff-Piggott, Timothy"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2017-10-12T14:05:31Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-10-12T14:05:31Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2017"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Statistical Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["MSc"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25651"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Discrete phylogeographic models enable the inference of the geographic history of biological organisms along phylogenetic trees. Frequently applied in the context of epidemiological modelling, phylogeographic generalised linear models were developed to allow for the evaluation of multiple predictors of spatial diffusion. The standard phylogeographic generalised linear model formulation, however, assumes that rates of spatial diffusion are a noiseless deterministic function of the set of covariates, admitting no other unobserved sources of variation. Under a variety of simulation scenarios, we demonstrate that the lack of a term modelling stochastic noise results in high false positive rates for predictors of spatial diffusion. We further show that the false positive rate can be controlled by including a random effect term, thus allowing unobserved sources of rate variation. Finally, we apply this random effects model to three recently published datasets and contrast the results of analysing these datasets with those obtained using the standard model. Our study demonstrates the prevalence of false positive results for predictors under the standard phylogeographic model in multiple simulation scenarios and, using empirical data from the literature, highlights the importance of a model accounting for random variation."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Identifying predictors of evolutionary dispersion with phylogeographic generalised linear models"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Lacerda, Miguel","Murrell, Ben"],"dc:creator":["Wolff-Piggott, Timothy"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2017-10-12T14:05:31Z"],"dc:date.available":["2017-10-12T14:05:31Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2017"],"dc:description.abstract":["Discrete phylogeographic models enable the inference of the geographic history of biological organisms along phylogenetic trees. Frequently applied in the context of epidemiological modelling, phylogeographic generalised linear models were developed to allow for the evaluation of multiple predictors of spatial diffusion. The standard phylogeographic generalised linear model formulation, however, assumes that rates of spatial diffusion are a noiseless deterministic function of the set of covariates, admitting no other unobserved sources of variation. Under a variety of simulation scenarios, we demonstrate that the lack of a term modelling stochastic noise results in high false positive rates for predictors of spatial diffusion. We further show that the false positive rate can be controlled by including a random effect term, thus allowing unobserved sources of rate variation. Finally, we apply this random effects model to three recently published datasets and contrast the results of analysing these datasets with those obtained using the standard model. Our study demonstrates the prevalence of false positive results for predictors under the standard phylogeographic model in multiple simulation scenarios and, using empirical data from the literature, highlights the importance of a model accounting for random variation."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25651"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Statistical Sciences"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:title":["Identifying predictors of evolutionary dispersion with phylogeographic generalised linear models"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["MSc"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:41Z"}