Back to results

School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics

A landscape approach used in designing a representative reserve system for the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This study was undertaken in order to propose a representative system of reserves which would protect the biodiversity within the study area. A technique based on the "Gap Analysis Programme" was used. This involved the determination of the representativeness of natural landscapes within the existing reserves, the identification of species richness, endemism and conservation status hotspots. Rules were formulated according to a broad conservation strategy. Once the rules had been set a reserve selection algorithm was run. Four scenarios were looked at: the first scenario merely modelled a reserve system based on the rule that 10% of the landscape should be protected; the second looked at protecting 10% of each landscape, but the proposed system had to include the important species hotspots; the third scenario proposed a reserve system based on the 10% rule which included all existing reserves; and the final scenario included the hotspots, all existing reserves and met the 10% protected landscape rule.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics
Year dc:date.issued
1996

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Loubser, David Ian
Advisors dc:contributor.advisor
  • Lombard, M
  • Barry, Michael

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17481
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/17481

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Loubser, David Ian. A landscape approach used in designing a representative reserve system for the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17481