Back to results

Centre for Rhetoric Studies

Media rhetoric in South Africa: a case study of the floor crossing debate

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This paper makes a critical analysis of media rhetoric in South Africa. It does so by looking at the Floor Crossing Legislation debate. It makes analysis of material, and texts that were reported by different media institutions to create a particular perception by repeatedly stating the same view through different forms of communication during the floor crossing debate. It also looks at the active part that the media plays in policy formulation particularly its influence on any bill that draws significant attention. Rhetorically, the paper will look at whether the methods or arguments employed by the media were successful in manipulating public perception and presenting a particular view.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Centre for Rhetoric Studies
Year dc:date.issued
2002

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Mpokotho, Constance Sebolelo
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Salazar, Philippe-Joseph

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17447
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/17447

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Mpokotho, Constance Sebolelo. Media rhetoric in South Africa: a case study of the floor crossing debate. Centre for Rhetoric Studies, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17447