{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15469"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15469","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The basis and boundaries of employee fiduciary duties in South African common law","abstract":"The nature and potential application of the common-law fiduciary doctrine, and of the distinctive nature of the duties to which it gives rise, is seldom appreciated or analysed in South African law. This is particularly evident in the law of employment, where the courts’ references to the ‘fiduciary’ nature of employment and the ‘fiduciary duties’ of employees have often been ambiguous, confused and unprincipled. In addition, there is almost no reference to employee fiduciary duties in the general literature on South African labour and employment law and, even where these duties are (briefly) mentioned, they are not acknowledged as being in any way separate or distinct from the employee’s other duties to the employer. This contrasts noticeably with other Commonwealth jurisdictions, where fiduciary duties form the basis of increasing numbers of cases, and are well-established and extensively debated aspects of the general jurisprudence, both generally and in relation to employees. This thesis critically explores and advances certain propositions about the general theoretical nature of the South African common- law fiduciary concept and the principles that govern the incidence, nature, purpose, scope and operation of fiduciary duties, with comparative reference to the positions in English and Canadian law. The first six chapters provide a critical analysis of those general propositions and principles. They also locate them and the debates that surround them within their broader legal and theoretical context. Chapter 7 considers their application to relationships of employment in order to determine the basis and boundaries of the fiduciary duties of employees (as ‘ordinary’ employee and in certain other established ‘fiduciary’ capacities commonly associated with employment) in terms of South African common law. In particular, the chapter considers when those duties will arise, their scope of application, what they require of the employee, and how they differ from other employee duties. Chapter 8 considers the broader issues of whether all relationships of employment are inherently and necessarily ‘fiduciary’ ones and whether they ought generally to be classified as a class of ‘fiduciary relationship’. The final chapter critiques the current position in South African law on these matters. It also suggests a set of fiduciary principles and propositions for the future application and development of fiduciary duties, both generally and in relation to employment, that are theoretically sound, clear, coherent and, where appropriate, consistent with contemporary jurisprudence in other comparable jurisdictions.","abstract_html":"The nature and potential application of the common-law fiduciary doctrine, and of the distinctive nature of the duties to which it gives rise, is seldom appreciated or analysed in South African law. This is particularly evident in the law of employment, where the courts’ references to the ‘fiduciary’ nature of employment and the ‘fiduciary duties’ of employees have often been ambiguous, confused and unprincipled. In addition, there is almost no reference to employee fiduciary duties in the general literature on South African labour and employment law and, even where these duties are (briefly) mentioned, they are not acknowledged as being in any way separate or distinct from the employee’s other duties to the employer. This contrasts noticeably with other Commonwealth jurisdictions, where fiduciary duties form the basis of increasing numbers of cases, and are well-established and extensively debated aspects of the general jurisprudence, both generally and in relation to employees. This thesis critically explores and advances certain propositions about the general theoretical nature of the South African common- law fiduciary concept and the principles that govern the incidence, nature, purpose, scope and operation of fiduciary duties, with comparative reference to the positions in English and Canadian law. The first six chapters provide a critical analysis of those general propositions and principles. They also locate them and the debates that surround them within their broader legal and theoretical context. Chapter 7 considers their application to relationships of employment in order to determine the basis and boundaries of the fiduciary duties of employees (as ‘ordinary’ employee and in certain other established ‘fiduciary’ capacities commonly associated with employment) in terms of South African common law. In particular, the chapter considers when those duties will arise, their scope of application, what they require of the employee, and how they differ from other employee duties. Chapter 8 considers the broader issues of whether all relationships of employment are inherently and necessarily ‘fiduciary’ ones and whether they ought generally to be classified as a class of ‘fiduciary relationship’. The final chapter critiques the current position in South African law on these matters. It also suggests a set of fiduciary principles and propositions for the future application and development of fiduciary duties, both generally and in relation to employment, that are theoretically sound, clear, coherent and, where appropriate, consistent with contemporary jurisprudence in other comparable jurisdictions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Idensohn, Kathleen"],"institution":"Department of Commercial Law","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Rycroft, Alan"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015","date_published":"2015","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:05Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15469","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Rycroft, Alan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Idensohn, Kathleen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-11-30T13:14:23Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-11-30T13:14:23Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2015"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Commercial Law"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Doctoral Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["PhD"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15469"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The nature and potential application of the common-law fiduciary doctrine, and of the distinctive nature of the duties to which it gives rise, is seldom appreciated or analysed in South African law. This is particularly evident in the law of employment, where the courts’ references to the ‘fiduciary’ nature of employment and the ‘fiduciary duties’ of employees have often been ambiguous, confused and unprincipled. In addition, there is almost no reference to employee fiduciary duties in the general literature on South African labour and employment law and, even where these duties are (briefly) mentioned, they are not acknowledged as being in any way separate or distinct from the employee’s other duties to the employer. This contrasts noticeably with other Commonwealth jurisdictions, where fiduciary duties form the basis of increasing numbers of cases, and are well-established and extensively debated aspects of the general jurisprudence, both generally and in relation to employees. This thesis critically explores and advances certain propositions about the general theoretical nature of the South African common- law fiduciary concept and the principles that govern the incidence, nature, purpose, scope and operation of fiduciary duties, with comparative reference to the positions in English and Canadian law. The first six chapters provide a critical analysis of those general propositions and principles. They also locate them and the debates that surround them within their broader legal and theoretical context. Chapter 7 considers their application to relationships of employment in order to determine the basis and boundaries of the fiduciary duties of employees (as ‘ordinary’ employee and in certain other established ‘fiduciary’ capacities commonly associated with employment) in terms of South African common law. In particular, the chapter considers when those duties will arise, their scope of application, what they require of the employee, and how they differ from other employee duties. Chapter 8 considers the broader issues of whether all relationships of employment are inherently and necessarily ‘fiduciary’ ones and whether they ought generally to be classified as a class of ‘fiduciary relationship’. The final chapter critiques the current position in South African law on these matters. It also suggests a set of fiduciary principles and propositions for the future application and development of fiduciary duties, both generally and in relation to employment, that are theoretically sound, clear, coherent and, where appropriate, consistent with contemporary jurisprudence in other comparable jurisdictions."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The basis and boundaries of employee fiduciary duties in South African common law"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Rycroft, Alan"],"dc:creator":["Idensohn, Kathleen"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-11-30T13:14:23Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-11-30T13:14:23Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2015"],"dc:description.abstract":["The nature and potential application of the common-law fiduciary doctrine, and of the distinctive nature of the duties to which it gives rise, is seldom appreciated or analysed in South African law. This is particularly evident in the law of employment, where the courts’ references to the ‘fiduciary’ nature of employment and the ‘fiduciary duties’ of employees have often been ambiguous, confused and unprincipled. In addition, there is almost no reference to employee fiduciary duties in the general literature on South African labour and employment law and, even where these duties are (briefly) mentioned, they are not acknowledged as being in any way separate or distinct from the employee’s other duties to the employer. This contrasts noticeably with other Commonwealth jurisdictions, where fiduciary duties form the basis of increasing numbers of cases, and are well-established and extensively debated aspects of the general jurisprudence, both generally and in relation to employees. This thesis critically explores and advances certain propositions about the general theoretical nature of the South African common- law fiduciary concept and the principles that govern the incidence, nature, purpose, scope and operation of fiduciary duties, with comparative reference to the positions in English and Canadian law. The first six chapters provide a critical analysis of those general propositions and principles. They also locate them and the debates that surround them within their broader legal and theoretical context. Chapter 7 considers their application to relationships of employment in order to determine the basis and boundaries of the fiduciary duties of employees (as ‘ordinary’ employee and in certain other established ‘fiduciary’ capacities commonly associated with employment) in terms of South African common law. In particular, the chapter considers when those duties will arise, their scope of application, what they require of the employee, and how they differ from other employee duties. Chapter 8 considers the broader issues of whether all relationships of employment are inherently and necessarily ‘fiduciary’ ones and whether they ought generally to be classified as a class of ‘fiduciary relationship’. The final chapter critiques the current position in South African law on these matters. It also suggests a set of fiduciary principles and propositions for the future application and development of fiduciary duties, both generally and in relation to employment, that are theoretically sound, clear, coherent and, where appropriate, consistent with contemporary jurisprudence in other comparable jurisdictions."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15469"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Commercial Law"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:title":["The basis and boundaries of employee fiduciary duties in South African common law"],"dc:type":["Doctoral Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:05Z"}