{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13473"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13473","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Cognitive strategies as a function of effort in elite, average and recreational cyclists","abstract":"The purposes of this study were two-fold; to develop a cycling-specific cognitive strategy classification system, and to investigate the differential and interactive effects of effort and competitive status, on associative strategy use in cyclists. Subjects consisted of 8 elite, 8 average, and 8 recreational cyclists (n = 24). A light weight micro-cassette recorder was used to document the subjects' verbalized thoughts while training. Effort was measured by the rating of percieved exertion (RPE), and through the recording of heart rate every 60 seconds. A cycling-specific subcategory of thought (equipment monitoring) was identified, which had not previously been identified in similar research on marathon runners. The implications of sport specific classification systems are discussed. Statistical analyses showed no support for the popular notion that cognitive strategy use varies according to competitive status. Neither did they show support for the notion that it varies according to effort. The statistically non-significant findings are discussed in the light of the stochastic nature of cycling, and recommendations are made to cater for this in future research.","abstract_html":"The purposes of this study were two-fold; to develop a cycling-specific cognitive strategy classification system, and to investigate the differential and interactive effects of effort and competitive status, on associative strategy use in cyclists. Subjects consisted of 8 elite, 8 average, and 8 recreational cyclists (n = 24). A light weight micro-cassette recorder was used to document the subjects' verbalized thoughts while training. Effort was measured by the rating of percieved exertion (RPE), and through the recording of heart rate every 60 seconds. A cycling-specific subcategory of thought (equipment monitoring) was identified, which had not previously been identified in similar research on marathon runners. The implications of sport specific classification systems are discussed. Statistical analyses showed no support for the popular notion that cognitive strategy use varies according to competitive status. Neither did they show support for the notion that it varies according to effort. The statistically non-significant findings are discussed in the light of the stochastic nature of cycling, and recommendations are made to cater for this in future research.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gahwiler, Clinton"],"institution":"Department of Psychology","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Schomer, Helgo; Du Preez, Peter"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1994,"date_issued":"1994","date_published":"1994","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:31Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13473","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Schomer, Helgo; Du Preez, Peter"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gahwiler, Clinton"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-07-14T08:56:17Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-07-14T08:56:17Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1994"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Department of Psychology"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["MA"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13473"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Includes bibliographical references."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purposes of this study were two-fold; to develop a cycling-specific cognitive strategy classification system, and to investigate the differential and interactive effects of effort and competitive status, on associative strategy use in cyclists. Subjects consisted of 8 elite, 8 average, and 8 recreational cyclists (n = 24). A light weight micro-cassette recorder was used to document the subjects' verbalized thoughts while training. Effort was measured by the rating of percieved exertion (RPE), and through the recording of heart rate every 60 seconds. A cycling-specific subcategory of thought (equipment monitoring) was identified, which had not previously been identified in similar research on marathon runners. The implications of sport specific classification systems are discussed. Statistical analyses showed no support for the popular notion that cognitive strategy use varies according to competitive status. Neither did they show support for the notion that it varies according to effort. The statistically non-significant findings are discussed in the light of the stochastic nature of cycling, and recommendations are made to cater for this in future research."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Cognitive strategies as a function of effort in elite, average and recreational cyclists"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Schomer, Helgo; Du Preez, Peter"],"dc:creator":["Gahwiler, Clinton"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-07-14T08:56:17Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-07-14T08:56:17Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1994"],"dc:description":["Includes bibliographical references."],"dc:description.abstract":["The purposes of this study were two-fold; to develop a cycling-specific cognitive strategy classification system, and to investigate the differential and interactive effects of effort and competitive status, on associative strategy use in cyclists. Subjects consisted of 8 elite, 8 average, and 8 recreational cyclists (n = 24). A light weight micro-cassette recorder was used to document the subjects' verbalized thoughts while training. Effort was measured by the rating of percieved exertion (RPE), and through the recording of heart rate every 60 seconds. A cycling-specific subcategory of thought (equipment monitoring) was identified, which had not previously been identified in similar research on marathon runners. The implications of sport specific classification systems are discussed. Statistical analyses showed no support for the popular notion that cognitive strategy use varies according to competitive status. Neither did they show support for the notion that it varies according to effort. The statistically non-significant findings are discussed in the light of the stochastic nature of cycling, and recommendations are made to cater for this in future research."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13473"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Department of Psychology"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:title":["Cognitive strategies as a function of effort in elite, average and recreational cyclists"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["MA"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:31Z"}