{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13110"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13110","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Outcomes of decompressive craniectomy in adults with severe traumatic brain injury: the Groote Schuur Hospital experience","abstract":"Object: The aim of this study was to assess outcome following decompressive craniectomy in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a South African neurosurgical unit. Methods: During a 78 month period (January 2005 – June 2011), 76 patients that underwent decompressive craniectomy for TBI in an attempt to lower raised intracranial pressure (ICP) were reviewed . All were older than 14 years and mass lesions were included. Thirty nine point four percent of the patients sustained blunt, low velocity injuries to the head and 19% were involved in motor vehicle accidents. Unilateral hemi-craniectomies were carried out in 81% of patients and 54 (75%) were done as primary decompressive craniectomies. Survivors were followed up for a period of at least six months and functional outcomes were measured using the Glasgow outcomes score. To simplify outcomes the patients were then dichotomised into outcome groups of good (GOS 4 and 5 ), and poor (GOS 1- 3). Results: At six months follow up 24 patients (33.3%) had a good outcome (GOS 4 or 5) and 48 patients (66.7%) had a poor outcome (GOS 1- 3). 32 patients (44.4%) died (GOS 1). There were 16 survivors in the poor group. Sixty percent o f survivors had a good outcome after decompressive craniectomy. Eighteen patients underwent secondary decompressive craniectomies and 54 (75%) primary decompressive craniectomies. Thirty - five percent of patients that underwent primary decompressive cranie ctomy had a good outcome, versus 38% in the secondary decompression group. Mortality was slightly higher in the primary decompression group (43%) than the secondary group (33%) . Factors that showed significant correlation with outcome were age, admission GCS and good response of ICP to decompressive craniectomy. Complications were encountered in 18% of patients with sepsis being the most common (11%). Conclusion: Decompressive craniectomy was associated with a functional outcome that was better than exp ected in patients with severe TBI and should still form part of salvage therapy in adults with TBI and elevated ICP.","abstract_html":"Object: The aim of this study was to assess outcome following decompressive craniectomy in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a South African neurosurgical unit. Methods: During a 78 month period (January 2005 – June 2011), 76 patients that underwent decompressive craniectomy for TBI in an attempt to lower raised intracranial pressure (ICP) were reviewed . All were older than 14 years and mass lesions were included. Thirty nine point four percent of the patients sustained blunt, low velocity injuries to the head and 19% were involved in motor vehicle accidents. Unilateral hemi-craniectomies were carried out in 81% of patients and 54 (75%) were done as primary decompressive craniectomies. Survivors were followed up for a period of at least six months and functional outcomes were measured using the Glasgow outcomes score. To simplify outcomes the patients were then dichotomised into outcome groups of good (GOS 4 and 5 ), and poor (GOS 1- 3). Results: At six months follow up 24 patients (33.3%) had a good outcome (GOS 4 or 5) and 48 patients (66.7%) had a poor outcome (GOS 1- 3). 32 patients (44.4%) died (GOS 1). There were 16 survivors in the poor group. Sixty percent o f survivors had a good outcome after decompressive craniectomy. Eighteen patients underwent secondary decompressive craniectomies and 54 (75%) primary decompressive craniectomies. Thirty - five percent of patients that underwent primary decompressive cranie ctomy had a good outcome, versus 38% in the secondary decompression group. Mortality was slightly higher in the primary decompression group (43%) than the secondary group (33%) . Factors that showed significant correlation with outcome were age, admission GCS and good response of ICP to decompressive craniectomy. Complications were encountered in 18% of patients with sepsis being the most common (11%). Conclusion: Decompressive craniectomy was associated with a functional outcome that was better than exp ected in patients with severe TBI and should still form part of salvage therapy in adults with TBI and elevated ICP.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Enslin, Johannes Marthinus Nicolaas"],"institution":"Division of Neurosurgery","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Semple, P L"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014","date_published":"2014","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:17Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13110","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Semple, P L"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Enslin, Johannes Marthinus Nicolaas"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-06-26T11:03:31Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-06-26T11:03:31Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Division of Neurosurgery"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["MMed"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13110"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Includes bibliographical references."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Object: The aim of this study was to assess outcome following decompressive craniectomy in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a South African neurosurgical unit. Methods: During a 78 month period (January 2005 – June 2011), 76 patients that underwent decompressive craniectomy for TBI in an attempt to lower raised intracranial pressure (ICP) were reviewed . All were older than 14 years and mass lesions were included. Thirty nine point four percent of the patients sustained blunt, low velocity injuries to the head and 19% were involved in motor vehicle accidents. Unilateral hemi-craniectomies were carried out in 81% of patients and 54 (75%) were done as primary decompressive craniectomies. Survivors were followed up for a period of at least six months and functional outcomes were measured using the Glasgow outcomes score. To simplify outcomes the patients were then dichotomised into outcome groups of good (GOS 4 and 5 ), and poor (GOS 1- 3). Results: At six months follow up 24 patients (33.3%) had a good outcome (GOS 4 or 5) and 48 patients (66.7%) had a poor outcome (GOS 1- 3). 32 patients (44.4%) died (GOS 1). There were 16 survivors in the poor group. Sixty percent o f survivors had a good outcome after decompressive craniectomy. Eighteen patients underwent secondary decompressive craniectomies and 54 (75%) primary decompressive craniectomies. Thirty - five percent of patients that underwent primary decompressive cranie ctomy had a good outcome, versus 38% in the secondary decompression group. Mortality was slightly higher in the primary decompression group (43%) than the secondary group (33%) . Factors that showed significant correlation with outcome were age, admission GCS and good response of ICP to decompressive craniectomy. Complications were encountered in 18% of patients with sepsis being the most common (11%). Conclusion: Decompressive craniectomy was associated with a functional outcome that was better than exp ected in patients with severe TBI and should still form part of salvage therapy in adults with TBI and elevated ICP."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Outcomes of decompressive craniectomy in adults with severe traumatic brain injury: the Groote Schuur Hospital experience"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Semple, P L"],"dc:creator":["Enslin, Johannes Marthinus Nicolaas"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-06-26T11:03:31Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-06-26T11:03:31Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014"],"dc:description":["Includes bibliographical references."],"dc:description.abstract":["Object: The aim of this study was to assess outcome following decompressive craniectomy in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a South African neurosurgical unit. Methods: During a 78 month period (January 2005 – June 2011), 76 patients that underwent decompressive craniectomy for TBI in an attempt to lower raised intracranial pressure (ICP) were reviewed . All were older than 14 years and mass lesions were included. Thirty nine point four percent of the patients sustained blunt, low velocity injuries to the head and 19% were involved in motor vehicle accidents. Unilateral hemi-craniectomies were carried out in 81% of patients and 54 (75%) were done as primary decompressive craniectomies. Survivors were followed up for a period of at least six months and functional outcomes were measured using the Glasgow outcomes score. To simplify outcomes the patients were then dichotomised into outcome groups of good (GOS 4 and 5 ), and poor (GOS 1- 3). Results: At six months follow up 24 patients (33.3%) had a good outcome (GOS 4 or 5) and 48 patients (66.7%) had a poor outcome (GOS 1- 3). 32 patients (44.4%) died (GOS 1). There were 16 survivors in the poor group. Sixty percent o f survivors had a good outcome after decompressive craniectomy. Eighteen patients underwent secondary decompressive craniectomies and 54 (75%) primary decompressive craniectomies. Thirty - five percent of patients that underwent primary decompressive cranie ctomy had a good outcome, versus 38% in the secondary decompression group. Mortality was slightly higher in the primary decompression group (43%) than the secondary group (33%) . Factors that showed significant correlation with outcome were age, admission GCS and good response of ICP to decompressive craniectomy. Complications were encountered in 18% of patients with sepsis being the most common (11%). Conclusion: Decompressive craniectomy was associated with a functional outcome that was better than exp ected in patients with severe TBI and should still form part of salvage therapy in adults with TBI and elevated ICP."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13110"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Division of Neurosurgery"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:title":["Outcomes of decompressive craniectomy in adults with severe traumatic brain injury: the Groote Schuur Hospital experience"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["MMed"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:17Z"}