Back to results

School of Economics

Is there a role for public interest provisions in South African competition law?

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The recent Wal-Mart/Massmart merger decision by the Competition Tribunal has highlighted the delicate role that the South African Competition Authorities (the Competition Commission, Competition Tribunal and the Competition Appeal Court) play between balancing public interest provisions and competition issues in merger decisions. A competition policy has been identified as a key instrument in economic development. This begets the question: does the Competition Act (Act 89 of 1998 as amended) empower the Competition Authorities with adequate tools to address economic policy challenges of South Africa? And if it does not, should the Competition Act be amended to provide for such tools and what should these amendments be if any?

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
School of Economics
Year dc:date.issued
2012

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Havemann, Scott
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Grzybowski, Lukasz

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12189
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/12189

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Havemann, Scott. Is there a role for public interest provisions in South African competition law?. School of Economics, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12189