{"id":{"repo_id":"cape-town","oai_identifier":"oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/12061"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cape-town/oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/12061","repository":{"repo_id":"cape-town","name":"University of Cape Town","base_url":"https://open.uct.ac.za/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Differing social positions and the realisation of evaluative criteria for transactional writing in the senior grades","abstract":"This study looked at the requirements - evaluative criteria - for transactional writing as they are specified for the Grade 11 level in current curriculum policy. Finding that the requirements are poorly specified, or weakly framed, the study addressed the question of what criteria teachers draw on in assessing transactional writing if not criteria offered by the curriculum.","abstract_html":"This study looked at the requirements - evaluative criteria - for transactional writing as they are specified for the Grade 11 level in current curriculum policy. Finding that the requirements are poorly specified, or weakly framed, the study addressed the question of what criteria teachers draw on in assessing transactional writing if not criteria offered by the curriculum.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kruger, Jared James"],"institution":"School of Education","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Hoadley, Ursula Kate"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012","date_published":"2012","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:51Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12061","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Hoadley, Ursula Kate"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kruger, Jared James"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-01-11T05:01:14Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-01-11T05:01:14Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2012"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["School of Education"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cape Town"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Master Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["MPhil"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12061"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Includes abstract.","Includes bibliographical references."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study looked at the requirements - evaluative criteria - for transactional writing as they are specified for the Grade 11 level in current curriculum policy. Finding that the requirements are poorly specified, or weakly framed, the study addressed the question of what criteria teachers draw on in assessing transactional writing if not criteria offered by the curriculum."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Differing social positions and the realisation of evaluative criteria for transactional writing in the senior grades"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Hoadley, Ursula Kate"],"dc:creator":["Kruger, Jared James"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-01-11T05:01:14Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-01-11T05:01:14Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2012"],"dc:description":["Includes abstract.","Includes bibliographical references."],"dc:description.abstract":["This study looked at the requirements - evaluative criteria - for transactional writing as they are specified for the Grade 11 level in current curriculum policy. Finding that the requirements are poorly specified, or weakly framed, the study addressed the question of what criteria teachers draw on in assessing transactional writing if not criteria offered by the curriculum."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12061"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["School of Education"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cape Town"],"dc:title":["Differing social positions and the realisation of evaluative criteria for transactional writing in the senior grades"],"dc:type":["Master Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["MPhil"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:22:51Z"}