Back to results

School of Economics

A pre-R year is it worth it, and what would it cost? An applied policy analysis

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Science is unequivocal in its support for the importance of early childhood development. Calls for increased investment in young children cite neuroscience, developmental psychology and health. It is hazardous, however, to make a direct leap from neuroscience to policy recommendations. Simply because early childhood provides opportunities for more economically efficient interventions which have dramatic impact on inequality, this does not mean that the ECD policies actually implemented by communities, provinces, or national government are worthy investments. Firstly, it is difficult to design programmes that improve children's cognitive or behavioural development. Secondly, the costs of even effective programmes might outweigh the benefits they generate for children, their families, and taxpayers. And finally, programmes in early childhood require upfront and politically brave investments that may take decades to pay off.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
School of Economics
Year dc:date.issued
2009

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Girdwood, Elizabeth
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Burns, Justine

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11877
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/11877

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Girdwood, Elizabeth. A pre-R year is it worth it, and what would it cost? An applied policy analysis. School of Economics, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11877