Back to results

Centre for Actuarial Research (CARE)

Economic evaluation of health care : cautions for the developing country context

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Health economics has expanded enormously as a sub-discipline in the last four decades, drawing primarily on the theoretical foundations of welfare economics. The toolkit for the economic evaluation of health care now extends from the humble cost-minimisation exercise, through cost effectiveness measures, to the more complex cost utility or cost benefit models. These methodologies have differing strengths and drawbacks. This paper evaluates those attributes on both the practical and theoretical dimensions. On the practical dimension: The developing country context differs from the wealthier country context in a number of ways. This paper considers the differences in resource constraints and the differences in health priorities and asks to what extent the methodology is able to accommodate these variations. On the theoretical dimension: Few health care evaluations are conducted in a Pareto Optimal world. This paper considers the extent to which the welfare economic foundations of a methodology are successfully imported into its construction, and then how that foundation translates into its practical application.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
Centre for Actuarial Research (CARE)
Year dc:date.issued
2002

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Skordis, Jolene
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Nattrass, Nicoli

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11674
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/11674

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Cape Town
Base URL
open.uct.ac.za/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Skordis, Jolene. Economic evaluation of health care : cautions for the developing country context. Centre for Actuarial Research (CARE), 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11674