{"id":{"repo_id":"cambridge","oai_identifier":"oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/396683"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cambridge/oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/396683","repository":{"repo_id":"cambridge","name":"Cambridge University","base_url":"https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Published Discourse of History Teachers 2004-2013","abstract":"This thesis is a study of history teacher published discourse. It draws on ten years of teacher publication in the journal Teaching History and uncovers (a) the nature of the discourse, (b) the principal themes addressed in the discourse and (c) the ways in which teachers contributing to the published discourse drew on the academic discipline of history. It argues, by means of a citation analysis, that, in the years in question, a number of sustained conversations emerged in the public discourse. In the textual analysis that builds on this, this study shows that curricular questions were those that most commonly concerned teachers writing in Teaching History. This study reveals, finally, that teachers drew on the academic discipline in this published discourse to (a) define the nature of what is taught, (b) to set gold standards for pupils and (c) to justify what takes place in the classroom as history. This analysis indicates that teachers see themselves as active participants in a form of disciplinary practice, which calls into question common assumptions about teacher knowledge and the relationship between school subject and academic discipline.","abstract_html":"This thesis is a study of history teacher published discourse. It draws on ten years of teacher publication in the journal Teaching History and uncovers (a) the nature of the discourse, (b) the principal themes addressed in the discourse and (c) the ways in which teachers contributing to the published discourse drew on the academic discipline of history. It argues, by means of a citation analysis, that, in the years in question, a number of sustained conversations emerged in the public discourse. In the textual analysis that builds on this, this study shows that curricular questions were those that most commonly concerned teachers writing in Teaching History. This study reveals, finally, that teachers drew on the academic discipline in this published discourse to (a) define the nature of what is taught, (b) to set gold standards for pupils and (c) to justify what takes place in the classroom as history. This analysis indicates that teachers see themselves as active participants in a form of disciplinary practice, which calls into question common assumptions about teacher knowledge and the relationship between school subject and academic discipline.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fordham, Michael"],"institution":"University of Cambridge","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Counsell, Christine","Gardner, Philip"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-01-01","date_published":"2019-01-01","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:28Z","subjects":["History education","Academic disciplines","Teachers","Teacher discourse"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/1b3f73a4-86a8-4378-8a3d-79f4296ce11b/download","http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.125961","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Counsell, Christine","Gardner, Philip"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["ESRC Funding (ended when employed by university)"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fordham, Michael"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019-01-01"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cambridge"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/396683"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["History education","Academic disciplines","Teachers","Teacher discourse"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/1b3f73a4-86a8-4378-8a3d-79f4296ce11b/download","http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.125961"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/accdb927-bb67-4ae4-8f1e-b43f5c2f7245/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis is a study of history teacher published discourse. It draws on ten years of teacher publication in the journal Teaching History and uncovers (a) the nature of the discourse, (b) the principal themes addressed in the discourse and (c) the ways in which teachers contributing to the published discourse drew on the academic discipline of history. It argues, by means of a citation analysis, that, in the years in question, a number of sustained conversations emerged in the public discourse. In the textual analysis that builds on this, this study shows that curricular questions were those that most commonly concerned teachers writing in Teaching History. This study reveals, finally, that teachers drew on the academic discipline in this published discourse to (a) define the nature of what is taught, (b) to set gold standards for pupils and (c) to justify what takes place in the classroom as history. This analysis indicates that teachers see themselves as active participants in a form of disciplinary practice, which calls into question common assumptions about teacher knowledge and the relationship between school subject and academic discipline."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["4c7977fa5707b13caabb258f06ab66a7","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Published Discourse of History Teachers 2004-2013"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Counsell, Christine","Gardner, Philip"],"dc:contributor.sponsor":["ESRC Funding (ended when employed by university)"],"dc:creator":["Fordham, Michael"],"dc:date.issued":["2019-01-01"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis is a study of history teacher published discourse. It draws on ten years of teacher publication in the journal Teaching History and uncovers (a) the nature of the discourse, (b) the principal themes addressed in the discourse and (c) the ways in which teachers contributing to the published discourse drew on the academic discipline of history. It argues, by means of a citation analysis, that, in the years in question, a number of sustained conversations emerged in the public discourse. In the textual analysis that builds on this, this study shows that curricular questions were those that most commonly concerned teachers writing in Teaching History. This study reveals, finally, that teachers drew on the academic discipline in this published discourse to (a) define the nature of what is taught, (b) to set gold standards for pupils and (c) to justify what takes place in the classroom as history. This analysis indicates that teachers see themselves as active participants in a form of disciplinary practice, which calls into question common assumptions about teacher knowledge and the relationship between school subject and academic discipline."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["4c7977fa5707b13caabb258f06ab66a7","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.125961"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/accdb927-bb67-4ae4-8f1e-b43f5c2f7245/download"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cambridge"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/396683"],"dc:rights":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/1b3f73a4-86a8-4378-8a3d-79f4296ce11b/download","http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved"],"dc:subject":["History education","Academic disciplines","Teachers","Teacher discourse"],"dc:title":["The Published Discourse of History Teachers 2004-2013"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:28Z"}