{"id":{"repo_id":"cambridge","oai_identifier":"oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/390495"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cambridge/oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/390495","repository":{"repo_id":"cambridge","name":"Cambridge University","base_url":"https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Caregiving, Crisis and Coercion in the American Revolutionary War","abstract":"This dissertation uses the health crisis of the American Revolutionary War to interrogate the coercive labour dynamics underpinning care work in early America. It examines the Continental Army’s efforts to utilise existing coercive labour regimes (including enslavement, indentured servitude and gendered wage work) and military medical structures inherited from the British Army to provide nursing care for sick and wounded American soldiers. Between 1775 and 1783, the conflict’s violence and disease produced upwards of thirty thousand sick and wounded soldiers. Each case of illness or injury could result in days, weeks or months of care, requiring the sustained labour of caregivers. Simultaneously mundane and urgent, intimate and dangerous, care work underpinned the very survival of the army. Though historians of both medicine and war increasingly recognise the impact of health and disease in the Revolutionary War, few linger on the dynamics and social, political and medical implications of the basic care work that underpinned medical practice – including intimate interactions with a patient’s body, administering medicines, sourcing heat and water, changing linens or emptying chamber pots after evacuative treatments. The activities of Continental Army nurses, for example, are usually summarised fleetingly with three verbs: ‘washing’, ‘cooking’ and ‘attending’ the sick. A crucial question is buried beneath the archival fragments of their lives: under what social conditions were caregivers motivated or compelled to perform the gruelling labour that few of us want to consider? The Revolutionary War, as a social and medical crisis, offers insight into the usually opaque labour dynamics of bodily care for the sick. Focusing predominantly on the ‘care communities’ of Philadelphia and rural Pennsylvania as case studies, the dissertation demonstrates the dominance of informal community care in early American healthcare, but argues that the flexibility and reciprocity of these localised care networks was facilitated by coercive labour regimes.","abstract_html":"This dissertation uses the health crisis of the American Revolutionary War to interrogate the coercive labour dynamics underpinning care work in early America. It examines the Continental Army’s efforts to utilise existing coercive labour regimes (including enslavement, indentured servitude and gendered wage work) and military medical structures inherited from the British Army to provide nursing care for sick and wounded American soldiers. Between 1775 and 1783, the conflict’s violence and disease produced upwards of thirty thousand sick and wounded soldiers. Each case of illness or injury could result in days, weeks or months of care, requiring the sustained labour of caregivers. Simultaneously mundane and urgent, intimate and dangerous, care work underpinned the very survival of the army. Though historians of both medicine and war increasingly recognise the impact of health and disease in the Revolutionary War, few linger on the dynamics and social, political and medical implications of the basic care work that underpinned medical practice – including intimate interactions with a patient’s body, administering medicines, sourcing heat and water, changing linens or emptying chamber pots after evacuative treatments. The activities of Continental Army nurses, for example, are usually summarised fleetingly with three verbs: ‘washing’, ‘cooking’ and ‘attending’ the sick. A crucial question is buried beneath the archival fragments of their lives: under what social conditions were caregivers motivated or compelled to perform the gruelling labour that few of us want to consider? The Revolutionary War, as a social and medical crisis, offers insight into the usually opaque labour dynamics of bodily care for the sick. Focusing predominantly on the ‘care communities’ of Philadelphia and rural Pennsylvania as case studies, the dissertation demonstrates the dominance of informal community care in early American healthcare, but argues that the flexibility and reciprocity of these localised care networks was facilitated by coercive labour regimes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Roberts, Meg"],"institution":"University of Cambridge","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Pearsall, Sarah","Guyatt, Nicholas"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-12-24","date_published":"2024-12-24","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:06Z","subjects":["Early America","Continental Army","Revolutionary War","Coerced Labour","Nursing","Care","Labour History"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6c244869-ba17-4ac2-8b36-857764504392/download","http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.122044","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Pearsall, Sarah","Guyatt, Nicholas"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["McNeil Center for Early American Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Friends Dissertation Fellowship, 2023-24. George Washington Presidential Library at Mount Vernon, three-month residential fellowship, 2023-24. Quaker & Special Collections, Haverford College, Gest Fellowship, 2023-24. American Revolution Institute at the Society of the Cincinnati, Massachusetts Society of the Cincinnati Fellowship, 2022-23. Historical Society of Pennsylvania & Library Company of Philadelphia, William H. Helfand Fellowship in American Medicine, Science, and Society, 2020-21. American Philosophical Society, David Center for the American Revolution Fellowship, 2020-21. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Robert M. & Annetta J. Coffelt and Robert M. Coffelt Jr. Fellowship, 2020-21."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Roberts, Meg"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2024-12-24"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cambridge"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/390495"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Early America","Continental Army","Revolutionary War","Coerced Labour","Nursing","Care","Labour History"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6c244869-ba17-4ac2-8b36-857764504392/download","http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved"]},{"key":"dc:rights.embargodate","label":"Dc Rights Embargodate","values":["2026-10-07"]},{"key":"dc:rights.embargotype","label":"Dc Rights Embargotype","values":["embargo"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.122044"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/1996dd53-ce57-4a49-974e-cdc792ba382e/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This dissertation uses the health crisis of the American Revolutionary War to interrogate the coercive labour dynamics underpinning care work in early America. It examines the Continental Army’s efforts to utilise existing coercive labour regimes (including enslavement, indentured servitude and gendered wage work) and military medical structures inherited from the British Army to provide nursing care for sick and wounded American soldiers. Between 1775 and 1783, the conflict’s violence and disease produced upwards of thirty thousand sick and wounded soldiers. Each case of illness or injury could result in days, weeks or months of care, requiring the sustained labour of caregivers. Simultaneously mundane and urgent, intimate and dangerous, care work underpinned the very survival of the army. Though historians of both medicine and war increasingly recognise the impact of health and disease in the Revolutionary War, few linger on the dynamics and social, political and medical implications of the basic care work that underpinned medical practice – including intimate interactions with a patient’s body, administering medicines, sourcing heat and water, changing linens or emptying chamber pots after evacuative treatments. The activities of Continental Army nurses, for example, are usually summarised fleetingly with three verbs: ‘washing’, ‘cooking’ and ‘attending’ the sick. A crucial question is buried beneath the archival fragments of their lives: under what social conditions were caregivers motivated or compelled to perform the gruelling labour that few of us want to consider? The Revolutionary War, as a social and medical crisis, offers insight into the usually opaque labour dynamics of bodily care for the sick. Focusing predominantly on the ‘care communities’ of Philadelphia and rural Pennsylvania as case studies, the dissertation demonstrates the dominance of informal community care in early American healthcare, but argues that the flexibility and reciprocity of these localised care networks was facilitated by coercive labour regimes."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["efcb1bc421094c6de68a35fd9929a427","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Caregiving, Crisis and Coercion in the American Revolutionary War"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Pearsall, Sarah","Guyatt, Nicholas"],"dc:contributor.sponsor":["McNeil Center for Early American Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Friends Dissertation Fellowship, 2023-24. George Washington Presidential Library at Mount Vernon, three-month residential fellowship, 2023-24. Quaker & Special Collections, Haverford College, Gest Fellowship, 2023-24. American Revolution Institute at the Society of the Cincinnati, Massachusetts Society of the Cincinnati Fellowship, 2022-23. Historical Society of Pennsylvania & Library Company of Philadelphia, William H. Helfand Fellowship in American Medicine, Science, and Society, 2020-21. American Philosophical Society, David Center for the American Revolution Fellowship, 2020-21. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Robert M. & Annetta J. Coffelt and Robert M. Coffelt Jr. Fellowship, 2020-21."],"dc:creator":["Roberts, Meg"],"dc:date.issued":["2024-12-24"],"dc:description.abstract":["This dissertation uses the health crisis of the American Revolutionary War to interrogate the coercive labour dynamics underpinning care work in early America. It examines the Continental Army’s efforts to utilise existing coercive labour regimes (including enslavement, indentured servitude and gendered wage work) and military medical structures inherited from the British Army to provide nursing care for sick and wounded American soldiers. Between 1775 and 1783, the conflict’s violence and disease produced upwards of thirty thousand sick and wounded soldiers. Each case of illness or injury could result in days, weeks or months of care, requiring the sustained labour of caregivers. Simultaneously mundane and urgent, intimate and dangerous, care work underpinned the very survival of the army. Though historians of both medicine and war increasingly recognise the impact of health and disease in the Revolutionary War, few linger on the dynamics and social, political and medical implications of the basic care work that underpinned medical practice – including intimate interactions with a patient’s body, administering medicines, sourcing heat and water, changing linens or emptying chamber pots after evacuative treatments. The activities of Continental Army nurses, for example, are usually summarised fleetingly with three verbs: ‘washing’, ‘cooking’ and ‘attending’ the sick. A crucial question is buried beneath the archival fragments of their lives: under what social conditions were caregivers motivated or compelled to perform the gruelling labour that few of us want to consider? The Revolutionary War, as a social and medical crisis, offers insight into the usually opaque labour dynamics of bodily care for the sick. Focusing predominantly on the ‘care communities’ of Philadelphia and rural Pennsylvania as case studies, the dissertation demonstrates the dominance of informal community care in early American healthcare, but argues that the flexibility and reciprocity of these localised care networks was facilitated by coercive labour regimes."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["efcb1bc421094c6de68a35fd9929a427","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.122044"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/1996dd53-ce57-4a49-974e-cdc792ba382e/download"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cambridge"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/390495"],"dc:rights":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6c244869-ba17-4ac2-8b36-857764504392/download","http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/allrightsreserved"],"dc:rights.embargodate":["2026-10-07"],"dc:rights.embargotype":["embargo"],"dc:subject":["Early America","Continental Army","Revolutionary War","Coerced Labour","Nursing","Care","Labour History"],"dc:title":["Caregiving, Crisis and Coercion in the American Revolutionary War"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:06Z"}