Back to results

University of Cambridge

Simulating the Human in Human-Centred Design: Increasing Efficiency in Design Activities

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

"All simulations are wrong, but some are useful." This quote is adapted from Prof. George E. P. Box's famous aphorism and encapsulates the central hypothesis of this thesis: well-structured simulation approaches, while inherently imperfect, can systematically enhance the efficiency and rigour of human-centred design (HCD), particularly particularly when access to stakeholders is limited and interdisciplinary complexity is high, such as designing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. This research is motivated by critical limitations observed in the practical application of the Design Research Methodology (DRM), a widely adopted model for structuring design research across four sequential stages: Research Clarification (RC), Descriptive Study I (DS-I), Prescriptive Study (PS), and Descriptive Study II (DS-II). Despite DRM’s conceptual clarity, its implementation often breaks down in real-world HCD and AAC contexts. The RC stage is time-consuming; DS-I and PS struggle with empirical grounding when user access is limited; and DS-II is inconsistently executed, particularly in domains requiring long-term validation. These issues are compounded in the era of generative AI, where user needs and technological implications are often under-defined or unstable at early stages. To address these limitations, this thesis introduces the triple-diamond design process, a staged, simulation-driven extension of DRM. This process unfolds in three phases—computer-simulation-based, proxy-user-based, and end-user-centred design—and strategically aligns with the corresponding DRM stages. Through three case studies situated in the design of AAC systems, the thesis explores how computational agents, surrogate user models, and structured transitions between design phases can be used to improve the efficiency and traceability of HCD. The first case study uses LLM-based agents to simulate stakeholder reasoning, supporting rapid insight generation during RC and DS-I. The second builds an imperfect surrogate user to explore interaction strategies and performance trade-offs in predictive text systems. The third case study integrates proxy-user evaluation and end-user feedback to iteratively refine a multimodal AAC system, completing the full DRM cycle. Together, these contributions offer empirical support for the staged simulation-driven process as a practical augmentation to DRM. This work demonstrates how simulations can reduce time and resource demands, compensate for missing data, and maintain empirical coherence in the design of complex human–AI systems.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Cambridge
Year dc:date.issued
2024

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Yang, Boyin
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Kristensson, Per Ola

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

dc:rights

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Author Identifier
0000-0002-5601-5119
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/387991

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Cambridge University
Base URL
api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Yang, Boyin. Simulating the Human in Human-Centred Design: Increasing Efficiency in Design Activities. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, 2024. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.120556