Back to results

University of Cambridge

Separating conflict-recovery from failure-recovery in distributed consensus

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Distributed databases provide fault tolerance while allowing multiple clients to concurrently submit requests and have those requests executed as if they are performed using a single thread on a single machine. This makes them vital components for a variety of distributed systems, from banking transactions to managing cluster configurations. At the core of these distributed databases is their consensus protocol which must order concurrently submitted requests and ensure that the system can mask or recover from failures. Current state-of-the-art consensus protocols re-use their failure-recovery mechanism to resolve ordering conflicts. The thesis of this dissertation is that it is feasible to separate the mechanisms for conflict-recovery and failure-recovery, and that doing so is effective in allowing each to be optimised separately. To support this thesis we first categorise existing conflict-recovery mechanisms and introduce Multi-Shot-FastPaxos which provides a uniform interface to express, and in some cases further optimise, conflict-recovery mechanisms separately from failure-recovery mechanisms. We also propose a new failure masking approach that reduces the overhead of masking coordinator failures and evaluate existing mechanisms for recovery from coordinator failure, allowing us to propose an optimised recovery procedure for etcd. Finally we present a case study designing a new protocol, Unanimous 2 Phase Commit, which from an initial basic implementation is optimised to equal or exceed the steady-state performance of the current state-of-the-art on all workloads, with an optimised recovery procedure.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Cambridge
Year dc:date.issued
2025

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Jensen, Christopher
Advisors dc:contributor.advisor
  • Mortier, Richard
  • Howard, Heidi

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

dc:rights

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
DOI dc:identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.119774
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/386642

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Cambridge University
Base URL
api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Jensen, Christopher. Separating conflict-recovery from failure-recovery in distributed consensus. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.119774