Back to results

University of Cambridge

New methods to answer old questions: A study of London infant and child mortality at the turn of the twentieth century

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This thesis has strived to understand the inequalities of infant and child mortality in London at the turn of the twentieth century (1895-1911), and to add to the debate on the historical infant mortality decline. Previous studies in this field have been plagued with limitations driven by data availability and quality. Now, historical demographers are turning to new technologies and methods – including big microdata, multilevel analysis and text-mining – to overcome these past issues. This thesis has contributed to the growing literature on new sources and methods, whilst remaining grounded in traditional historical demography debate, and has focused on one urban area: London. London was – and still is – a ‘mosaic of communities’ with its inhabitants’ experiences varying vastly. It is also a city with considerable historical data availability, therefore providing huge potential for comparative analysis. By applying a mixed method approach that utilises both quantitative and qualitative sources, the infant and child mortality experiences of individual Londoners and aggregate London registration sub-districts have been compared. The thesis can be broken down into three main sections. The first section has interrogated the quality of occupational and social class coding of the big microdata project, I-CeM, before comparing and contrasting different data sources/methods in order to determine the accuracy of aggregate infant mortality rates. The second section has employed multilevel modelling techniques to visualise and understand the inequalities – by social class, place, and otherwise – of individual-level indirectly estimated child mortality. The third section added depth and nuance to the quantitative results through both the close-reading, and text-mining, of the Medical Officer of Health Reports for two contrasting areas within London: Bethnal Green and Wandsworth. In the conclusion, the results of the quantitative and qualitative analyses have been triangulated to form robust conclusions and highlight areas suitable for further research. Overall, this thesis has contributed to the body of evidence supporting the role of the ‘Health of Towns’ Movement and Female Empowerment theories of infant mortality decline. Additionally, it has contributed to knowledge on infant and child mortality inequalities associated with social class, place, migrant-status, the employment of mothers and the influence of Women Sanitary Inspectors.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Cambridge
Year dc:date.issued
2022

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Rafferty, Sarah
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Reid, Alice

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Rights

dc:rights
Language dc:language
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Author Identifier
0000-0003-2286-3598
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/369472

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Cambridge University
Base URL
api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Rafferty, Sarah. New methods to answer old questions: A study of London infant and child mortality at the turn of the twentieth century. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.109261