{"id":{"repo_id":"cambridge","oai_identifier":"oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/346373"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cambridge/oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/346373","repository":{"repo_id":"cambridge","name":"Cambridge University","base_url":"https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Inuit Harvesting Strategies in the Canadian Arctic and Implications for Wildlife Management","abstract":"The thesis analyses two topics: native harvesting strategies and selected cases of over-exploitation. Its purpose is to assess the credibility of the assumption that hunter-gatherer societies do not have a system of self-regulation. Theoretical explanations and models are described to elicit underlying principles and coherent systems in hunter-gatherer harvesting strategies and adaptation processes. Two annual cycles of the Netsilik Inuit are discussed and examined in a formal theory model to analyse what changes and effects occurred when the rifle was introduced to their subsistence economy. The evidence supporting the Pleistocene overkill theory and the claim that hunters over-exploited some of the major barren-ground caribou herds in the Northwest Territories is examined. The evidence is found to be unproven and inconclusive. The nature of self-regulation in hunter-gatherer societies as supported by ethnographic literature is described and determined to be extant. Hunters practice control in harvesting through the acquired knowledge and institutional means to monitor and avert overhunting. It is also evident that harvesters have a sound basis of knowledge and expertise in animal ecology. In the appendix. four cases are described where the traditional system of harvesting/management has proven successful and superior to state imposed wildlife management. The thesis concludes that the assumption is erroneous: there exists a socially-constructed system of self-regulation. The implications for wildlife management are discussed and it is concluded that although there is greater recognition of the native system of harvesting/management today, it is not generally accepted that they possess the knowledge and expertise to organize an effective management strategy.","abstract_html":"The thesis analyses two topics: native harvesting strategies and selected cases of over-exploitation. Its purpose is to assess the credibility of the assumption that hunter-gatherer societies do not have a system of self-regulation. Theoretical explanations and models are described to elicit underlying principles and coherent systems in hunter-gatherer harvesting strategies and adaptation processes. Two annual cycles of the Netsilik Inuit are discussed and examined in a formal theory model to analyse what changes and effects occurred when the rifle was introduced to their subsistence economy. The evidence supporting the Pleistocene overkill theory and the claim that hunters over-exploited some of the major barren-ground caribou herds in the Northwest Territories is examined. The evidence is found to be unproven and inconclusive. The nature of self-regulation in hunter-gatherer societies as supported by ethnographic literature is described and determined to be extant. Hunters practice control in harvesting through the acquired knowledge and institutional means to monitor and avert overhunting. It is also evident that harvesters have a sound basis of knowledge and expertise in animal ecology. In the appendix. four cases are described where the traditional system of harvesting/management has proven successful and superior to state imposed wildlife management. The thesis concludes that the assumption is erroneous: there exists a socially-constructed system of self-regulation. The implications for wildlife management are discussed and it is concluded that although there is greater recognition of the native system of harvesting/management today, it is not generally accepted that they possess the knowledge and expertise to organize an effective management strategy.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Netherwood, Marshall"],"institution":"University of Cambridge","degree_name":"Master of Philosophy (MPhil)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1987,"date_issued":"1987-06","date_published":"1987-06","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:17Z","subjects":["Inuit","Wildlife management","Hunter-gatherers","Harvesting strategies"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/8a4906de-5c86-4c6d-a989-3182b0c15249/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.93791","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Netherwood, Marshall"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1987-06"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cambridge"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/346373"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Master of Philosophy (MPhil)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Inuit","Wildlife management","Hunter-gatherers","Harvesting strategies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/8a4906de-5c86-4c6d-a989-3182b0c15249/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.17863/CAM.93791"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/5c204bad-c252-4f45-ab54-9db2a93efb9d/download","https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/c901210f-ce71-4674-86ef-1231c0ec109f/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The thesis analyses two topics: native harvesting strategies and selected cases of over-exploitation. Its purpose is to assess the credibility of the assumption that hunter-gatherer societies do not have a system of self-regulation. Theoretical explanations and models are described to elicit underlying principles and coherent systems in hunter-gatherer harvesting strategies and adaptation processes. Two annual cycles of the Netsilik Inuit are discussed and examined in a formal theory model to analyse what changes and effects occurred when the rifle was introduced to their subsistence economy. The evidence supporting the Pleistocene overkill theory and the claim that hunters over-exploited some of the major barren-ground caribou herds in the Northwest Territories is examined. The evidence is found to be unproven and inconclusive. The nature of self-regulation in hunter-gatherer societies as supported by ethnographic literature is described and determined to be extant. Hunters practice control in harvesting through the acquired knowledge and institutional means to monitor and avert overhunting. It is also evident that harvesters have a sound basis of knowledge and expertise in animal ecology. In the appendix. four cases are described where the traditional system of harvesting/management has proven successful and superior to state imposed wildlife management. The thesis concludes that the assumption is erroneous: there exists a socially-constructed system of self-regulation. The implications for wildlife management are discussed and it is concluded that although there is greater recognition of the native system of harvesting/management today, it is not generally accepted that they possess the knowledge and expertise to organize an effective management strategy."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["7475cb804177a7e82a208239a41cf17a","e30138c7d259e987817963ddd0b7455f","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Inuit Harvesting Strategies in the Canadian Arctic and Implications for Wildlife Management"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Netherwood, Marshall"],"dc:date.issued":["1987-06"],"dc:description.abstract":["The thesis analyses two topics: native harvesting strategies and selected cases of over-exploitation. Its purpose is to assess the credibility of the assumption that hunter-gatherer societies do not have a system of self-regulation. Theoretical explanations and models are described to elicit underlying principles and coherent systems in hunter-gatherer harvesting strategies and adaptation processes. Two annual cycles of the Netsilik Inuit are discussed and examined in a formal theory model to analyse what changes and effects occurred when the rifle was introduced to their subsistence economy. The evidence supporting the Pleistocene overkill theory and the claim that hunters over-exploited some of the major barren-ground caribou herds in the Northwest Territories is examined. The evidence is found to be unproven and inconclusive. The nature of self-regulation in hunter-gatherer societies as supported by ethnographic literature is described and determined to be extant. Hunters practice control in harvesting through the acquired knowledge and institutional means to monitor and avert overhunting. It is also evident that harvesters have a sound basis of knowledge and expertise in animal ecology. In the appendix. four cases are described where the traditional system of harvesting/management has proven successful and superior to state imposed wildlife management. The thesis concludes that the assumption is erroneous: there exists a socially-constructed system of self-regulation. The implications for wildlife management are discussed and it is concluded that although there is greater recognition of the native system of harvesting/management today, it is not generally accepted that they possess the knowledge and expertise to organize an effective management strategy."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["7475cb804177a7e82a208239a41cf17a","e30138c7d259e987817963ddd0b7455f","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.17863/CAM.93791"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/5c204bad-c252-4f45-ab54-9db2a93efb9d/download","https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/c901210f-ce71-4674-86ef-1231c0ec109f/download"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cambridge"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/346373"],"dc:rights":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/8a4906de-5c86-4c6d-a989-3182b0c15249/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"dc:subject":["Inuit","Wildlife management","Hunter-gatherers","Harvesting strategies"],"dc:title":["Inuit Harvesting Strategies in the Canadian Arctic and Implications for Wildlife Management"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Master of Philosophy (MPhil)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:17Z"}