{"id":{"repo_id":"cambridge","oai_identifier":"oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/339369"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cambridge/oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/339369","repository":{"repo_id":"cambridge","name":"Cambridge University","base_url":"https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Frozen in Place: American Policy and Practice in Antarctica","abstract":"After the Antarctic Treaty entered into force, the United States Antarctic Program grew from an unstructured beginning and developed into an entrenched bureaucracy. The bureaucracy evolved its own interests, not all of which were consistent with national interests. As a result, a program with exemplary capacity struggled against internal squabbling, waste and inefficiency, leaving a gap between performance and potential. The Introduction overviews current American interests and policies in the Antarctic. Chapter One traces the history of America in Antarctica until 1961, when the Antarctic Treaty came into force. Chapter Two describes tne development and operations of the U.S. Antarctic Program. Chapter Three dissects the connection between policies and issues. The Conclusion offers a diagnosis and prescription.","abstract_html":"After the Antarctic Treaty entered into force, the United States Antarctic Program grew from an unstructured beginning and developed into an entrenched bureaucracy. The bureaucracy evolved its own interests, not all of which were consistent with national interests. As a result, a program with exemplary capacity struggled against internal squabbling, waste and inefficiency, leaving a gap between performance and potential. The Introduction overviews current American interests and policies in the Antarctic. Chapter One traces the history of America in Antarctica until 1961, when the Antarctic Treaty came into force. Chapter Two describes tne development and operations of the U.S. Antarctic Program. Chapter Three dissects the connection between policies and issues. The Conclusion offers a diagnosis and prescription.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Berkowitz, Ethan"],"institution":"University of Cambridge","degree_name":"Master of Philosophy (MPhil)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1986,"date_issued":"1986-06-16","date_published":"1986-06-16","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:13Z","subjects":["Antarctic Treaty","United States Antarctic Program","Antarctica","Antarctic"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/f5eb5d7f-e65d-4620-a4ec-a890119e122d/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.86778","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Berkowitz, Ethan"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1986-06-16"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cambridge"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/339369"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Master of Philosophy (MPhil)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Antarctic Treaty","United States Antarctic Program","Antarctica","Antarctic"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/f5eb5d7f-e65d-4620-a4ec-a890119e122d/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.17863/CAM.86778"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/3273902a-9cd6-4fa6-993e-233870619bb9/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["After the Antarctic Treaty entered into force, the United States Antarctic Program grew from an unstructured beginning and developed into an entrenched bureaucracy. The bureaucracy evolved its own interests, not all of which were consistent with national interests. As a result, a program with exemplary capacity struggled against internal squabbling, waste and inefficiency, leaving a gap between performance and potential. The Introduction overviews current American interests and policies in the Antarctic. Chapter One traces the history of America in Antarctica until 1961, when the Antarctic Treaty came into force. Chapter Two describes tne development and operations of the U.S. Antarctic Program. Chapter Three dissects the connection between policies and issues. The Conclusion offers a diagnosis and prescription."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["9377cd183be666f0391625f0bc5d1b1a","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Frozen in Place: American Policy and Practice in Antarctica"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Berkowitz, Ethan"],"dc:date.issued":["1986-06-16"],"dc:description.abstract":["After the Antarctic Treaty entered into force, the United States Antarctic Program grew from an unstructured beginning and developed into an entrenched bureaucracy. The bureaucracy evolved its own interests, not all of which were consistent with national interests. As a result, a program with exemplary capacity struggled against internal squabbling, waste and inefficiency, leaving a gap between performance and potential. The Introduction overviews current American interests and policies in the Antarctic. Chapter One traces the history of America in Antarctica until 1961, when the Antarctic Treaty came into force. Chapter Two describes tne development and operations of the U.S. Antarctic Program. Chapter Three dissects the connection between policies and issues. The Conclusion offers a diagnosis and prescription."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["9377cd183be666f0391625f0bc5d1b1a","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.17863/CAM.86778"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/3273902a-9cd6-4fa6-993e-233870619bb9/download"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cambridge"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/339369"],"dc:rights":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/f5eb5d7f-e65d-4620-a4ec-a890119e122d/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"dc:subject":["Antarctic Treaty","United States Antarctic Program","Antarctica","Antarctic"],"dc:title":["Frozen in Place: American Policy and Practice in Antarctica"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Master of Philosophy (MPhil)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:13Z"}