Back to results

University of Cambridge

Chronographia and Imperium: continuing the chronicle tradition of Eusebius-Jerome and Sigebert of Gembloux in twelfth-century Normandy

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The Eusebius-Jeromian tradition of universal chronicle, as transmitted in twelfth-century Normandy via Sigebert of Gembloux, embodied an understanding of time (chronographia) as framed by the succession of the political order (imperium). Whereas earlier scholars attributed the twelfth-century success of Sigebert’s chronicle to its chronological precision rather than its political ideas, this thesis shows that the Eusebius-Jeromian tradition, as transmitted to twelfth-century Normandy, hinged on a political understanding framed by the ebb and flow of political order. By analysing the wider textual community of Sigebert’s chronicle in Normandy, the thesis addresses Robert of Torigni’s (1106-1186) Chronography, the Mortemer continuation, the Ourscamp continuation, and John of Salisbury’s (1120-1180) Historia Pontificalis. Norman and Norman-linked chroniclers actively engaged with the political implications of Sigebert’s chronicle, manipulating its conceptions of time, political order, and empire to match the political realities emerging in twelfth-century Normandy and Europe. Robert of Torigni, along with the Mortemer and Ourscamp chroniclers, elaborated a unitary narrative of the past to legitimize Henry II’s hegemony after the civil war. The Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Norman, and the more dubious Galfridian British pasts were normalized within the succession of time since the Creation and elevated as crucial stages within the economy of Salvation. John of Salisbury, member of the Angevin court and, later, exiled by the outburst of the Becket dispute, recognized the political implications of Sigebert’s chronicle and wrote his Historia Pontificalis as a hybrid continuation and, at the same time, as an opposed reaction to Sigebert’s chronicle. Because of the politico-chronological dimension of the Eusebius-Jeromian tradition, its Norman and Norman-linked continuators elaborated sophisticated textual projects which provided a political reconstruction of the order of time and propagated a unitary vision of universal history matching the political realities emerging in twelfth-century Normandy and Europe.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Cambridge
Year dc:date.issued
2020

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Passabi, Gabriele
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Van Houts, Elisabeth

Subjects

dc:subject × 10

Rights

dc:rights
Language dc:language
eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
DOI dc:identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.64737
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/317622

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Cambridge University
Base URL
api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Passabi, Gabriele. Chronographia and Imperium: continuing the chronicle tradition of Eusebius-Jerome and Sigebert of Gembloux in twelfth-century Normandy. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.64737