Back to results

University of Cambridge

À mes amis qui croient et à ceux qui croient ne pas croire: Natural Knowledge of God and the Propulsion of Reason in Henri de Lubac; A Re-assessment

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This study is a reconsideration of the place and significance of the natural light of human reason in attaining knowledge of God according to the thought of Henri de Lubac. In the Anglophone theological literature of the later twentieth century, a notable consensus has emerged that de Lubac’s celebrated text, Surnaturel (1946) implicitly disallows any status for natural knowledge of God in advance of the activity of created grace. The present thesis is concerned with the way in which de Lubac’s clarification of the ‘pure nature’ debate was related to an even more pervasive concern with ‘natural theology’; and that—given de Lubac’s central theological vision and the actual evidences within his total œuvre—the seeming consensus on the implications of Surnaturel may not stand. This study seeks to clarify and reconceive the natural theology task which de Lubac undertook, arguing that it was this project, even beyond his interest in the nature-grace relation, which was his abiding life’s interest; the metaphysical attitude displayed here organizes the interior of his wider theological œuvre. De Lubac’s natural theology has been profoundly misunderstood since the time of its release, and moreover, this misunderstanding may be seen to be the most proximate reason for de Lubac’s censure by the Jesuits in 1950, which in turn perpetuated the continuing misconception. The present work of clarification proceeds by close analysis and re-assessment of de Lubac early writings, and his works on natural knowledge of God (Connaissance and Chemins), as well by reference to the hitherto unseen historical archive of the Jesuits in Rome, in order to chart the full trajectory of de Lubac’s thought, to show that he may not be said to collapse the classical Thomist distinction between natural theology and revelation. The study concludes with an assessment of the success of de Lubac’s thought in view of contemporary philosophy of religion debates, and questions the extent to which his natural theology might be relevant today. A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Divinity

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Cambridge
Year dc:date.issued
2020

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Moller, Philip James
Advisors dc:contributor.advisor
  • Coakley, Sarah
  • Davison, Andrew

Subjects

dc:subject × 7

Rights

dc:rights
Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
DOI dc:identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.51205
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/304120

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Cambridge University
Base URL
api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Moller, Philip James. À mes amis qui croient et à ceux qui croient ne pas croire: Natural Knowledge of God and the Propulsion of Reason in Henri de Lubac; A Re-assessment. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.51205