{"id":{"repo_id":"cambridge","oai_identifier":"oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/302392"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cambridge/oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/302392","repository":{"repo_id":"cambridge","name":"Cambridge University","base_url":"https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Effect of Supply Chain Configuration on Small Modular Reactor Economics","abstract":"This thesis examines the opportunity presented by small modular reactors (SMRs) to bring down the cost of nuclear power. The economies of scale that have traditionally driven nuclear vendors to design larger reactors can be overcome for small reactors by the combination of standardisation of design, modularisation of the build process, and progressive reduction in production cost through learning. By employing the most comprehensive nuclear plant construction cost data available, in conjunction with established cost estimating methods, a model was devised to estimate the capital costs and levelized electricity cost of a SMR, based on conventional light water reactor technology. Key elements of supply chain configuration were parameterised in the model, enabling the investigation of its effect on SMR economics. Credible SMR supply chain configurations were hypothesised, by applying procurement decision models to industry data and nuclear sector specific constraints. These configurations were evaluated using the model against a range of programme conditions. Beyond single programme supply chain design, the challenges posed by global production and deployment were considered, such as the segmentation of market demand, variations in labour costs, and the implications of regulatory barriers and localisation for SMR cost reduction methods. The costs of first developing a SMR programme were also estimated. It was established that in order for SMRs to become cost competitive with large nuclear plants, a sizeable programme of at least 10 GW of standard units is needed to achieve sufficient production volume and production rate. The preferred SMR size is in the region of 250 MWe, to achieve a balance between economies of scale and learning. Progress needs to be made in harmonising global technical standards and safety regulation to make the product-like reactor concept feasible. Moreover, a committed supply chain of collaborative enterprise partners, rather than competing transactional suppliers, is required to realise the necessary learning cost reduction.","abstract_html":"This thesis examines the opportunity presented by small modular reactors (SMRs) to bring down the cost of nuclear power. The economies of scale that have traditionally driven nuclear vendors to design larger reactors can be overcome for small reactors by the combination of standardisation of design, modularisation of the build process, and progressive reduction in production cost through learning. By employing the most comprehensive nuclear plant construction cost data available, in conjunction with established cost estimating methods, a model was devised to estimate the capital costs and levelized electricity cost of a SMR, based on conventional light water reactor technology. Key elements of supply chain configuration were parameterised in the model, enabling the investigation of its effect on SMR economics. Credible SMR supply chain configurations were hypothesised, by applying procurement decision models to industry data and nuclear sector specific constraints. These configurations were evaluated using the model against a range of programme conditions. Beyond single programme supply chain design, the challenges posed by global production and deployment were considered, such as the segmentation of market demand, variations in labour costs, and the implications of regulatory barriers and localisation for SMR cost reduction methods. The costs of first developing a SMR programme were also estimated. It was established that in order for SMRs to become cost competitive with large nuclear plants, a sizeable programme of at least 10 GW of standard units is needed to achieve sufficient production volume and production rate. The preferred SMR size is in the region of 250 MWe, to achieve a balance between economies of scale and learning. Progress needs to be made in harmonising global technical standards and safety regulation to make the product-like reactor concept feasible. Moreover, a committed supply chain of collaborative enterprise partners, rather than competing transactional suppliers, is required to realise the necessary learning cost reduction.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lyons, Robbie Eric"],"institution":"University of Cambridge","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Shwageraus, Eugene"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-03-28","date_published":"2020-03-28","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:28Z","subjects":["nuclear","small modular reactor","supply chain","economics"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Figure 1: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Figure 3: Republished with permission of Robert Rosner. Figure 11: Copyright American Economic Association; reproduced with permission of the American Economic Review. Figure 21: Republished with permission of Elsevier Science & Technology Journals; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Figure 22: Republished with permission of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Figure 24: Republished with permission of OECD; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Figure 47: Republished with permission of MIT."],"rights_urls":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6cfa6a2a-905b-4d60-b56a-69f3ce7cd8a7/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.49463","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Shwageraus, Eugene"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["Funded by EPSRC through the ICO CDT in Nuclear Energy"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lyons, Robbie Eric"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2020-03-28"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cambridge"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/302392"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["nuclear","small modular reactor","supply chain","economics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6cfa6a2a-905b-4d60-b56a-69f3ce7cd8a7/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/","Figure 1: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Figure 3: Republished with permission of Robert Rosner. Figure 11: Copyright American Economic Association; reproduced with permission of the American Economic Review. Figure 21: Republished with permission of Elsevier Science & Technology Journals; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Figure 22: Republished with permission of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Figure 24: Republished with permission of OECD; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Figure 47: Republished with permission of MIT."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.17863/CAM.49463"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6a690e74-7caa-4007-9240-93d89b77f2f7/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis examines the opportunity presented by small modular reactors (SMRs) to bring down the cost of nuclear power. The economies of scale that have traditionally driven nuclear vendors to design larger reactors can be overcome for small reactors by the combination of standardisation of design, modularisation of the build process, and progressive reduction in production cost through learning. By employing the most comprehensive nuclear plant construction cost data available, in conjunction with established cost estimating methods, a model was devised to estimate the capital costs and levelized electricity cost of a SMR, based on conventional light water reactor technology. Key elements of supply chain configuration were parameterised in the model, enabling the investigation of its effect on SMR economics. Credible SMR supply chain configurations were hypothesised, by applying procurement decision models to industry data and nuclear sector specific constraints. These configurations were evaluated using the model against a range of programme conditions. Beyond single programme supply chain design, the challenges posed by global production and deployment were considered, such as the segmentation of market demand, variations in labour costs, and the implications of regulatory barriers and localisation for SMR cost reduction methods. The costs of first developing a SMR programme were also estimated. It was established that in order for SMRs to become cost competitive with large nuclear plants, a sizeable programme of at least 10 GW of standard units is needed to achieve sufficient production volume and production rate. The preferred SMR size is in the region of 250 MWe, to achieve a balance between economies of scale and learning. Progress needs to be made in harmonising global technical standards and safety regulation to make the product-like reactor concept feasible. Moreover, a committed supply chain of collaborative enterprise partners, rather than competing transactional suppliers, is required to realise the necessary learning cost reduction."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["519a2f0a71a5d6fb1b482ec7a2251953","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effect of Supply Chain Configuration on Small Modular Reactor Economics"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Shwageraus, Eugene"],"dc:contributor.sponsor":["Funded by EPSRC through the ICO CDT in Nuclear Energy"],"dc:creator":["Lyons, Robbie Eric"],"dc:date.issued":["2020-03-28"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis examines the opportunity presented by small modular reactors (SMRs) to bring down the cost of nuclear power. The economies of scale that have traditionally driven nuclear vendors to design larger reactors can be overcome for small reactors by the combination of standardisation of design, modularisation of the build process, and progressive reduction in production cost through learning. By employing the most comprehensive nuclear plant construction cost data available, in conjunction with established cost estimating methods, a model was devised to estimate the capital costs and levelized electricity cost of a SMR, based on conventional light water reactor technology. Key elements of supply chain configuration were parameterised in the model, enabling the investigation of its effect on SMR economics. Credible SMR supply chain configurations were hypothesised, by applying procurement decision models to industry data and nuclear sector specific constraints. These configurations were evaluated using the model against a range of programme conditions. Beyond single programme supply chain design, the challenges posed by global production and deployment were considered, such as the segmentation of market demand, variations in labour costs, and the implications of regulatory barriers and localisation for SMR cost reduction methods. The costs of first developing a SMR programme were also estimated. It was established that in order for SMRs to become cost competitive with large nuclear plants, a sizeable programme of at least 10 GW of standard units is needed to achieve sufficient production volume and production rate. The preferred SMR size is in the region of 250 MWe, to achieve a balance between economies of scale and learning. Progress needs to be made in harmonising global technical standards and safety regulation to make the product-like reactor concept feasible. Moreover, a committed supply chain of collaborative enterprise partners, rather than competing transactional suppliers, is required to realise the necessary learning cost reduction."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["519a2f0a71a5d6fb1b482ec7a2251953","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.17863/CAM.49463"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6a690e74-7caa-4007-9240-93d89b77f2f7/download"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cambridge"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/302392"],"dc:rights":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6cfa6a2a-905b-4d60-b56a-69f3ce7cd8a7/download","https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/","Figure 1: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Figure 3: Republished with permission of Robert Rosner. Figure 11: Copyright American Economic Association; reproduced with permission of the American Economic Review. Figure 21: Republished with permission of Elsevier Science & Technology Journals; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Figure 22: Republished with permission of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Figure 24: Republished with permission of OECD; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Figure 47: Republished with permission of MIT."],"dc:subject":["nuclear","small modular reactor","supply chain","economics"],"dc:title":["The Effect of Supply Chain Configuration on Small Modular Reactor Economics"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:28Z"}