Back to results

University of Cambridge

Social (In)Visibility and Disease Performativity: Qualitative Insights From Two US Case Studies

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This thesis centres on questions of (in)visibility in the lives of US “patients” with one of two chronic diseases (alkaptonuria and vitiligo). Specifically, it explores the role that social (in)visibility plays in the everyday lives of “patients” from both disease groups who experience their disease in relation to other social identities that they simultaneously occupy (including race, class and gender. In this thesis I conceptualise (in)visibility with respect to a wide range of issues related to the ways in which respondents exhibited and/ or failed to exhibit themselves and their diseases. Using grounded theory as a methodological framework, I collected data using a number of qualitative methods, including: semi-structured in-depth interviews, two ethnographies that took place at patient workshops in the US and the UK, and participant observation. This thesis consists of 4 empirical chapters that centre on issues pertaining to stigma, passing, pain and personal responsibility. Each of these issues is deeply embedded within narratives of how participants conceptualised their experiences of being “seen” and “unseen” in relation to their diseases, and speak to how those feelings are, in turn, informed by their disease’s relative (in)visibility. The first chapter, “Experiencing Stigma: Narratives of Precarity, Vulnerability and Loss,” details the ways in which participants are routinely stigmatised because of their disease, and how their anticipation of stigma affects them on an everyday basis. The second chapter outlines the ways in which participants seek to conceal their disease from the public by masking their symptoms and/ or drawing attention away from them through the use of external objects. The third chapter considers pain as a non-visual signifier of “illness,” and explores the ways in which experiences of being “seen” and/ or “unseen” in relation to their condition influences the participant’s understandings of pain. My final empirical chapter considers how contemporary assumptions about the individual’s ability to take responsibility for their health overlooks the financial, social and political restrictions that render many incapable of doing so. As a result, I argue that the individual is “invisibilised” within a system that stresses a need for personal responsibility whilst overlooking the individual’s (in)capacity to assume it.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Cambridge
Year dc:date.issued
2019

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Spratt, Tanisha Jemma Rose
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Weinberg, Darin

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Rights

dc:rights
Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
DOI dc:identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.46077
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/299017

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Cambridge University
Base URL
api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Spratt, Tanisha Jemma Rose. Social (In)Visibility and Disease Performativity: Qualitative Insights From Two US Case Studies. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.46077