{"id":{"repo_id":"cambridge","oai_identifier":"oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/298167"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cambridge/oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/298167","repository":{"repo_id":"cambridge","name":"Cambridge University","base_url":"https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Little fish in big ponds: fisheries and community development in Alaska and Greenland","abstract":"Development of remote regions in the circumpolar north has been the subject of much academic, political, and community discourse. This thesis examines the effects that two different fisheries management regimes, the Western Alaska CDQ program and Greenland's Inshore Shrimp Fishery, have on community development. It briefly describes the natural environments, the resident peoples and their histories, and present socio-economic conditions of the regions that participate in the two programs. It then reviews relevant development literature, and, based on that review, selects criteria for evaluation and comparison. This thesis analyzes the two regimes, and supporting programs, on issues of control, adequacy of resource base, amount and availability of capital, employment created, social organization of work production, reliance on existing skills and fostering of new ones, and long-term political viability. It concludes that market-based resource regimes hold dangers for indigenous residents of remote regions. However, establishing community rights to resources, rather than individual ownership, appears to mitigate some of the dangers. Moreover, as seen in the CDQ program, community-rights frameworks can exist within larger individualoriented, market-based regimes.","abstract_html":"Development of remote regions in the circumpolar north has been the subject of much academic, political, and community discourse. This thesis examines the effects that two different fisheries management regimes, the Western Alaska CDQ program and Greenland's Inshore Shrimp Fishery, have on community development. It briefly describes the natural environments, the resident peoples and their histories, and present socio-economic conditions of the regions that participate in the two programs. It then reviews relevant development literature, and, based on that review, selects criteria for evaluation and comparison. This thesis analyzes the two regimes, and supporting programs, on issues of control, adequacy of resource base, amount and availability of capital, employment created, social organization of work production, reliance on existing skills and fostering of new ones, and long-term political viability. It concludes that market-based resource regimes hold dangers for indigenous residents of remote regions. However, establishing community rights to resources, rather than individual ownership, appears to mitigate some of the dangers. Moreover, as seen in the CDQ program, community-rights frameworks can exist within larger individualoriented, market-based regimes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Johnson, Michael Fox"],"institution":"University of Cambridge","degree_name":"Master of Philosophy (MPhil)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1997,"date_issued":"1997-07-11","date_published":"1997-07-11","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:59Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/a8798a1a-6150-4370-a8a8-e3aea8240444/download","http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.45224","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["Digitisation of this thesis was sponsored by Arcadia Fund, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Johnson, Michael Fox"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1997-07-11"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cambridge"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/298167"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Master of Philosophy (MPhil)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/a8798a1a-6150-4370-a8a8-e3aea8240444/download","http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.17863/CAM.45224"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/3fb566d8-5891-45bd-9052-bfb3997c8b85/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Development of remote regions in the circumpolar north has been the subject of much academic, political, and community discourse. This thesis examines the effects that two different fisheries management regimes, the Western Alaska CDQ program and Greenland's Inshore Shrimp Fishery, have on community development. It briefly describes the natural environments, the resident peoples and their histories, and present socio-economic conditions of the regions that participate in the two programs. It then reviews relevant development literature, and, based on that review, selects criteria for evaluation and comparison. This thesis analyzes the two regimes, and supporting programs, on issues of control, adequacy of resource base, amount and availability of capital, employment created, social organization of work production, reliance on existing skills and fostering of new ones, and long-term political viability. It concludes that market-based resource regimes hold dangers for indigenous residents of remote regions. However, establishing community rights to resources, rather than individual ownership, appears to mitigate some of the dangers. Moreover, as seen in the CDQ program, community-rights frameworks can exist within larger individualoriented, market-based regimes."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["6784053408999d1e0f2d486092b79a19","5fa56e6d222b2c76d5b5262961fe888e"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Little fish in big ponds: fisheries and community development in Alaska and Greenland"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.sponsor":["Digitisation of this thesis was sponsored by Arcadia Fund, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin"],"dc:creator":["Johnson, Michael Fox"],"dc:date.issued":["1997-07-11"],"dc:description.abstract":["Development of remote regions in the circumpolar north has been the subject of much academic, political, and community discourse. This thesis examines the effects that two different fisheries management regimes, the Western Alaska CDQ program and Greenland's Inshore Shrimp Fishery, have on community development. It briefly describes the natural environments, the resident peoples and their histories, and present socio-economic conditions of the regions that participate in the two programs. It then reviews relevant development literature, and, based on that review, selects criteria for evaluation and comparison. This thesis analyzes the two regimes, and supporting programs, on issues of control, adequacy of resource base, amount and availability of capital, employment created, social organization of work production, reliance on existing skills and fostering of new ones, and long-term political viability. It concludes that market-based resource regimes hold dangers for indigenous residents of remote regions. However, establishing community rights to resources, rather than individual ownership, appears to mitigate some of the dangers. Moreover, as seen in the CDQ program, community-rights frameworks can exist within larger individualoriented, market-based regimes."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["6784053408999d1e0f2d486092b79a19","5fa56e6d222b2c76d5b5262961fe888e"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.17863/CAM.45224"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/3fb566d8-5891-45bd-9052-bfb3997c8b85/download"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cambridge"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/298167"],"dc:rights":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/a8798a1a-6150-4370-a8a8-e3aea8240444/download","http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"dc:title":["Little fish in big ponds: fisheries and community development in Alaska and Greenland"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Master of Philosophy (MPhil)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:23:59Z"}