{"id":{"repo_id":"cambridge","oai_identifier":"oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/290708"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cambridge/oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/290708","repository":{"repo_id":"cambridge","name":"Cambridge University","base_url":"https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Spintronics Physics of Thin-film Interfaces","abstract":"Magnetic heterostructures may exhibit new features at the interface while leaving the bulk properties of the films unaltered, which make them ideal for technological applications. Here, I explore the interfaces of EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001), EuO/NiO(111) and graphene/metal heterostructures. Published DFT calculations postulated the formation of a spin polarised two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in the EuO film at $\\sim$1.5 nm away from the EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001) interface, due to the polar catastrophe which would also enhance the $T_{C}$ of the EuO. Magnetisation depth profiles of the interface with the LaO$^+$- and mixed- terminated LaAlO$_3$(001) substrate are investigated using low energy muon spin relaxation ($\\mu$SR) and polarised neutron reflectivity (PNR). The behaviour of our EuO(001) film is unlike that reported in the literature for stoichiometric EuO and EuO$_{1-x}$ films, and no increase in the $T_{C}$ was detected by the $\\mu$SR. Instead, a reduction of $\\sim$2.6 K in the $T_{C}$ is measured by the SQUID which is attributed to the lattice mismatch between the EuO(001) and the LaAlO$_3$(001) substrate. However, contradictory results were obtained by the PNR for the LaO$^+$-terminated sample, where a magnetic moment of 3.59 $\\mu_{B}$Eu atom, which is consistent with the value reported by Barbagallo $\\textit{et al.}$ for a 9\\% oxygen-deficient EuO, was detected at 20 nm from the EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001) interface. Therefore, I question the accuracy of the DFT calculations. Exchange bias and the magnetisation depth profile of the polar interface of the antiferromagnet NiO(111) with EuO are investigated using PNR, and the results are compared with those of an uncoupled EuO grown on a MgO(001) substrate. A small double shifted hysteresis loop with enhanced coercivity, which arise as a result of the competition of the random NiO(111) $\\textit{S}$-domains, is measured by the SQUID magnetometer for the polar interface. However, a larger spin-split in the PNR is observed for the EuO(001)/MgO(001) sample in contrast to the EuO/NiO(111). The small spin-split in the latter is attributed to the pinning of the EuO magnetisation by the randomised NiO(111) S-domains which restrict it from aligning fully with the applied field. This postulation is verified by further PNR measurements on a field-cooled EuO/NiO(111) sample, which showed equal probability for the presence of compensated and uncompensated NiO(111) spins at the interface. A magnetic moment in graphene can be induced in the presence of a ferromagnetic layer as a result of the proximity effect. PNR measurements show that a magnetic moment of $\\sim$0.57 $\\mu_{B}$ is induced in the graphene when it is grown on Ni(111) and on Co(111) films, which is about 5$\\times$ higher than that reported in the literature. The origin of the induced magnetic moment is found to be due to the opening of the graphene’s Dirac cones as a result of the strong C $_{p}-3d$ hybridisation which is confirmed by additional measurements using a non-magnetic Ni$_9$Mo$_1$(111) substrate. The results were also validated by the Bayesian uncertainty analysis, and proved by the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurements.","abstract_html":"Magnetic heterostructures may exhibit new features at the interface while leaving the bulk properties of the films unaltered, which make them ideal for technological applications. Here, I explore the interfaces of EuO(001)/LaAlO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>3</sub></span>(001), EuO/NiO(111) and graphene/metal heterostructures. Published DFT calculations postulated the formation of a spin polarised two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in the EuO film at $\\sim$1.5 nm away from the EuO(001)/LaAlO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>3</sub></span>(001) interface, due to the polar catastrophe which would also enhance the <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">T<sub>C</sub></span> of the EuO. Magnetisation depth profiles of the interface with the LaO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sup>+</sup></span>- and mixed- terminated LaAlO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>3</sub></span>(001) substrate are investigated using low energy muon spin relaxation (<span class=\"etd-inline-math\">&mu;</span>SR) and polarised neutron reflectivity (PNR). The behaviour of our EuO(001) film is unlike that reported in the literature for stoichiometric EuO and EuO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>1-x</sub></span> films, and no increase in the <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">T<sub>C</sub></span> was detected by the <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">&mu;</span>SR. Instead, a reduction of $\\sim$2.6 K in the <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">T<sub>C</sub></span> is measured by the SQUID which is attributed to the lattice mismatch between the EuO(001) and the LaAlO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>3</sub></span>(001) substrate. However, contradictory results were obtained by the PNR for the LaO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sup>+</sup></span>-terminated sample, where a magnetic moment of 3.59 <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">&mu;<sub>B</sub></span>Eu atom, which is consistent with the value reported by Barbagallo <span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><em>et al.</em></span> for a 9\\% oxygen-deficient EuO, was detected at 20 nm from the EuO(001)/LaAlO<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>3</sub></span>(001) interface. Therefore, I question the accuracy of the DFT calculations. Exchange bias and the magnetisation depth profile of the polar interface of the antiferromagnet NiO(111) with EuO are investigated using PNR, and the results are compared with those of an uncoupled EuO grown on a MgO(001) substrate. A small double shifted hysteresis loop with enhanced coercivity, which arise as a result of the competition of the random NiO(111) <span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><em>S</em></span>-domains, is measured by the SQUID magnetometer for the polar interface. However, a larger spin-split in the PNR is observed for the EuO(001)/MgO(001) sample in contrast to the EuO/NiO(111). The small spin-split in the latter is attributed to the pinning of the EuO magnetisation by the randomised NiO(111) S-domains which restrict it from aligning fully with the applied field. This postulation is verified by further PNR measurements on a field-cooled EuO/NiO(111) sample, which showed equal probability for the presence of compensated and uncompensated NiO(111) spins at the interface. A magnetic moment in graphene can be induced in the presence of a ferromagnetic layer as a result of the proximity effect. PNR measurements show that a magnetic moment of $\\sim$0.57 <span class=\"etd-inline-math\">&mu;<sub>B</sub></span> is induced in the graphene when it is grown on Ni(111) and on Co(111) films, which is about 5$\\times$ higher than that reported in the literature. The origin of the induced magnetic moment is found to be due to the opening of the graphene’s Dirac cones as a result of the strong C <span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>p</sub>-3d</span> hybridisation which is confirmed by additional measurements using a non-magnetic Ni<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>9</sub></span>Mo<span class=\"etd-inline-math\"><sub>1</sub></span>(111) substrate. The results were also validated by the Bayesian uncertainty analysis, and proved by the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurements.","abstract_has_math":true,"creators":["Aboljadayel, Razan Omar M"],"institution":"University of Cambridge","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Barnes, Crispin H. W."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-03-06","date_published":"2019-03-06","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:25Z","subjects":["Spintronics","Thin film","Magnetism","nanotechnology"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/7c464080-4ee1-4a4f-8c53-ad83b6531977/download","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:creator.authoridentifier","label":"Author Identifier","values":["0000000245129858"],"render_values":[{"text":"0000-0002-4512-9858","href":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4512-9858","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.37908","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Barnes, Crispin H. W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["The government of Saudi Arabia"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Aboljadayel, Razan Omar M"]},{"key":"dc:creator.authoridentifier","label":"Author Identifier","values":["0000000245129858"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019-03-06"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Cambridge"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/290708"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Spintronics","Thin film","Magnetism","nanotechnology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/7c464080-4ee1-4a4f-8c53-ad83b6531977/download","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.17863/CAM.37908"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/b99b602c-1b4e-48da-b149-21025dd27aac/download"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Magnetic heterostructures may exhibit new features at the interface while leaving the bulk properties of the films unaltered, which make them ideal for technological applications. Here, I explore the interfaces of EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001), EuO/NiO(111) and graphene/metal heterostructures. Published DFT calculations postulated the formation of a spin polarised two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in the EuO film at $\\sim$1.5 nm away from the EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001) interface, due to the polar catastrophe which would also enhance the $T_{C}$ of the EuO. Magnetisation depth profiles of the interface with the LaO$^+$- and mixed- terminated LaAlO$_3$(001) substrate are investigated using low energy muon spin relaxation ($\\mu$SR) and polarised neutron reflectivity (PNR). The behaviour of our EuO(001) film is unlike that reported in the literature for stoichiometric EuO and EuO$_{1-x}$ films, and no increase in the $T_{C}$ was detected by the $\\mu$SR. Instead, a reduction of $\\sim$2.6 K in the $T_{C}$ is measured by the SQUID which is attributed to the lattice mismatch between the EuO(001) and the LaAlO$_3$(001) substrate. However, contradictory results were obtained by the PNR for the LaO$^+$-terminated sample, where a magnetic moment of 3.59 $\\mu_{B}$Eu atom, which is consistent with the value reported by Barbagallo $\\textit{et al.}$ for a 9\\% oxygen-deficient EuO, was detected at 20 nm from the EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001) interface. Therefore, I question the accuracy of the DFT calculations. Exchange bias and the magnetisation depth profile of the polar interface of the antiferromagnet NiO(111) with EuO are investigated using PNR, and the results are compared with those of an uncoupled EuO grown on a MgO(001) substrate. A small double shifted hysteresis loop with enhanced coercivity, which arise as a result of the competition of the random NiO(111) $\\textit{S}$-domains, is measured by the SQUID magnetometer for the polar interface. However, a larger spin-split in the PNR is observed for the EuO(001)/MgO(001) sample in contrast to the EuO/NiO(111). The small spin-split in the latter is attributed to the pinning of the EuO magnetisation by the randomised NiO(111) S-domains which restrict it from aligning fully with the applied field. This postulation is verified by further PNR measurements on a field-cooled EuO/NiO(111) sample, which showed equal probability for the presence of compensated and uncompensated NiO(111) spins at the interface. A magnetic moment in graphene can be induced in the presence of a ferromagnetic layer as a result of the proximity effect. PNR measurements show that a magnetic moment of $\\sim$0.57 $\\mu_{B}$ is induced in the graphene when it is grown on Ni(111) and on Co(111) films, which is about 5$\\times$ higher than that reported in the literature. The origin of the induced magnetic moment is found to be due to the opening of the graphene’s Dirac cones as a result of the strong C $_{p}-3d$ hybridisation which is confirmed by additional measurements using a non-magnetic Ni$_9$Mo$_1$(111) substrate. The results were also validated by the Bayesian uncertainty analysis, and proved by the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurements."]},{"key":"dc:format.checksum.md5","label":"Dc Format Checksum Md5","values":["e060ca7300cba80bd3ace3cbaf28f442","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Spintronics Physics of Thin-film Interfaces"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Barnes, Crispin H. W."],"dc:contributor.sponsor":["The government of Saudi Arabia"],"dc:creator":["Aboljadayel, Razan Omar M"],"dc:creator.authoridentifier":["0000000245129858"],"dc:date.issued":["2019-03-06"],"dc:description.abstract":["Magnetic heterostructures may exhibit new features at the interface while leaving the bulk properties of the films unaltered, which make them ideal for technological applications. Here, I explore the interfaces of EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001), EuO/NiO(111) and graphene/metal heterostructures. Published DFT calculations postulated the formation of a spin polarised two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in the EuO film at $\\sim$1.5 nm away from the EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001) interface, due to the polar catastrophe which would also enhance the $T_{C}$ of the EuO. Magnetisation depth profiles of the interface with the LaO$^+$- and mixed- terminated LaAlO$_3$(001) substrate are investigated using low energy muon spin relaxation ($\\mu$SR) and polarised neutron reflectivity (PNR). The behaviour of our EuO(001) film is unlike that reported in the literature for stoichiometric EuO and EuO$_{1-x}$ films, and no increase in the $T_{C}$ was detected by the $\\mu$SR. Instead, a reduction of $\\sim$2.6 K in the $T_{C}$ is measured by the SQUID which is attributed to the lattice mismatch between the EuO(001) and the LaAlO$_3$(001) substrate. However, contradictory results were obtained by the PNR for the LaO$^+$-terminated sample, where a magnetic moment of 3.59 $\\mu_{B}$Eu atom, which is consistent with the value reported by Barbagallo $\\textit{et al.}$ for a 9\\% oxygen-deficient EuO, was detected at 20 nm from the EuO(001)/LaAlO$_3$(001) interface. Therefore, I question the accuracy of the DFT calculations. Exchange bias and the magnetisation depth profile of the polar interface of the antiferromagnet NiO(111) with EuO are investigated using PNR, and the results are compared with those of an uncoupled EuO grown on a MgO(001) substrate. A small double shifted hysteresis loop with enhanced coercivity, which arise as a result of the competition of the random NiO(111) $\\textit{S}$-domains, is measured by the SQUID magnetometer for the polar interface. However, a larger spin-split in the PNR is observed for the EuO(001)/MgO(001) sample in contrast to the EuO/NiO(111). The small spin-split in the latter is attributed to the pinning of the EuO magnetisation by the randomised NiO(111) S-domains which restrict it from aligning fully with the applied field. This postulation is verified by further PNR measurements on a field-cooled EuO/NiO(111) sample, which showed equal probability for the presence of compensated and uncompensated NiO(111) spins at the interface. A magnetic moment in graphene can be induced in the presence of a ferromagnetic layer as a result of the proximity effect. PNR measurements show that a magnetic moment of $\\sim$0.57 $\\mu_{B}$ is induced in the graphene when it is grown on Ni(111) and on Co(111) films, which is about 5$\\times$ higher than that reported in the literature. The origin of the induced magnetic moment is found to be due to the opening of the graphene’s Dirac cones as a result of the strong C $_{p}-3d$ hybridisation which is confirmed by additional measurements using a non-magnetic Ni$_9$Mo$_1$(111) substrate. The results were also validated by the Bayesian uncertainty analysis, and proved by the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurements."],"dc:format.checksum.md5":["e060ca7300cba80bd3ace3cbaf28f442","87eda9de84448d1f82354d60eee3eb5f"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.17863/CAM.37908"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/b99b602c-1b4e-48da-b149-21025dd27aac/download"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Cambridge"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/290708"],"dc:rights":["https://apollo8-f-pro.lib.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/7c464080-4ee1-4a4f-8c53-ad83b6531977/download","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"],"dc:subject":["Spintronics","Thin film","Magnetism","nanotechnology"],"dc:title":["Spintronics Physics of Thin-film Interfaces"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:25Z"}